Indexed in Journament

clinical and experimental gastroenterology

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.8/100
Journament Score
#4,951
Journament Rank
34
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name clinical and experimental gastroenterology
Abbreviated Name clinical and experimental gastroenterology
URL https://www.dovepress.com/clinical-and-experimental-gastroenterology-journal

Indexings

doaj

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (34)

2019
Eosinophilic esophagitis: early diagnosis is the key
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 391-399
411 views Abstract
2012
the written discourse of interviewing style for a magazine interview
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 93-103
407 views DOI Abstract
2015
retrospective data collection: can students remember?
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 1-19
398 views DOI Abstract
2016
community of assessment practice or interests: the case of eap writing assessment
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 272-281
355 views DOI Abstract
2016
descriptive study of honorific use in korean email discourse
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 99-111
354 views DOI Abstract
2016
Efficacy of the low FODMAP diet for treating irritable bowel syndrome: the evidence to date
Vol. 9 , pp. 131-142
345 views DOI Abstract
2016
Efficacy of the low FODMAP diet for treating irritable bowel syndrome: the evidence to date
Vol. 9 , pp. 131--142
308 views DOI Abstract
2017
lexico-stylistic choices and media ideology in newspaper reports on niger delta conflicts
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 167-175
304 views DOI Abstract
2019
Eosinophilic esophagitis: early diagnosis is the key
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 391-399
411 views Abstract
2017
lexico-stylistic choices and media ideology in newspaper reports on niger delta conflicts
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 167-175
304 views DOI Abstract
2017
blended learning: student perception of face-to-face and online efl lessons
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 64-71
224 views DOI Abstract
2017
personality type and translation performance of persian translator trainees
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 360-370
128 views DOI Abstract
2017
english interjections as a word class: a tri-stratal description
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 127-130
19 views DOI Abstract
2017
negotiating social identity through questions in casual conversations: a critical discourse analysis
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 311-318
270 views DOI Abstract
2017
unraveling relatively unclear stories: a narrative analysis of student-teachers’ identity work
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 172-183
289 views DOI Abstract
42
Overall
Below Average
31
50
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

41.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.