clinical and experimental gastroenterology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#616 / 33,952
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

clinical and experimental gastroenterology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name clinical and experimental gastroenterology
Abbreviated Name clinical and experimental gastroenterology
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.dovepress.com/clinical-and-experimental-gastroenterology-journal
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (34 total)

2019
Eosinophilic esophagitis: early diagnosis is the key
AB, Muir;T, Brown-Whitehorn;B, Godwin;A, Cianferoni;
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 391-399
388 views Abstract
2012
the written discourse of interviewing style for a magazine interview
;Jessie Barrot
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 93-103
382 views DOI Abstract
2015
retrospective data collection: can students remember?
;Paul Leeming
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 1-19
365 views DOI Abstract
2016
community of assessment practice or interests: the case of eap writing assessment
;Faisal Al-Maamari
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 272-281
321 views DOI Abstract
2016
Efficacy of the low FODMAP diet for treating irritable bowel syndrome: the evidence to date
Vol. 9 , pp. 131--142
316 views DOI Abstract
2016
Efficacy of the low FODMAP diet for treating irritable bowel syndrome: the evidence to date
Wathsala S Nanayakkara;Paula ML Skidmore;Leigh O'Brien;Tim J Wilkinson;Richard B Gearry and
Vol. 9 , pp. 131-142
308 views DOI Abstract
2016
descriptive study of honorific use in korean email discourse
;Jaegu Kim
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 99-111
298 views DOI Abstract
2016
Efficacy of the low FODMAP diet for treating irritable bowel syndrome: the evidence to date
Wathsala S Nanayakkara;Paula ML Skidmore;Leigh O'Brien;Tim J Wilkinson;Richard B Gearry;
Vol. 9 , pp. 131--142
283 views DOI Abstract
2020
Sustained Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission During Vedolizumab Maintenance Therapy in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis on Stable Concomitant Corticosteroids During Induction Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of GEMINI 1
Loftus EV;Sands BE;Colombel JF;Dotan I;Khalid JM;Tudor D;Geransar P;;
Vol. 13 , pp. -
279 views Abstract
2017
lexico-stylistic choices and media ideology in newspaper reports on niger delta conflicts
;Chuka Fred Ononye
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 167-175
263 views DOI Abstract
View All 34 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
50
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.