Indexed in Journament

clinical and experimental gastroenterology

EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
30.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #16,947 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
34 Articles
Scores higher than 42.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name clinical and experimental gastroenterology
Abbreviated Name clinical and experimental gastroenterology
URL https://www.dovepress.com/clinical-and-experimental-gastroenterology-journal

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 35.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 12.1 5.8
Content Distribution 61.5 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (34)

2019
Eosinophilic esophagitis: early diagnosis is the key
AB, Muir;T, Brown-Whitehorn;B, Godwin;A, Cianferoni;
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 391-399
427 views Abstract
2012
the written discourse of interviewing style for a magazine interview
;Jessie Barrot
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 93-103
423 views DOI Abstract
2015
retrospective data collection: can students remember?
;Paul Leeming
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 1-19
413 views DOI Abstract
2016
descriptive study of honorific use in korean email discourse
;Jaegu Kim
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 99-111
368 views DOI Abstract
2016
community of assessment practice or interests: the case of eap writing assessment
;Faisal Al-Maamari
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 272-281
366 views DOI Abstract
2016
Efficacy of the low FODMAP diet for treating irritable bowel syndrome: the evidence to date
Wathsala S Nanayakkara;Paula ML Skidmore;Leigh O'Brien;Tim J Wilkinson;Richard B Gearry and
Vol. 9 , pp. 131-142
362 views DOI Abstract
2016
Efficacy of the low FODMAP diet for treating irritable bowel syndrome: the evidence to date
Vol. 9 , pp. 131--142
359 views DOI Abstract
2020
Sustained Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission During Vedolizumab Maintenance Therapy in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis on Stable Concomitant Corticosteroids During Induction Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of GEMINI 1
Loftus EV;Sands BE;Colombel JF;Dotan I;Khalid JM;Tudor D;Geransar P;;
Vol. 13 , pp. -
329 views Abstract
2016
Efficacy of the low FODMAP diet for treating irritable bowel syndrome: the evidence to date
Wathsala S Nanayakkara;Paula ML Skidmore;Leigh O'Brien;Tim J Wilkinson;Richard B Gearry;
Vol. 9 , pp. 131--142
321 views DOI Abstract
2017
lexico-stylistic choices and media ideology in newspaper reports on niger delta conflicts
;Chuka Fred Ononye
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 167-175
318 views DOI Abstract
2020
Sustained Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission During Vedolizumab Maintenance Therapy in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis on Stable Concomitant Corticosteroids During Induction Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of GEMINI 1
Loftus EV;Sands BE;Colombel JF;Dotan I;Khalid JM;Tudor D;Geransar P;;
Vol. 13 , pp. -
329 views Abstract
2019
Eosinophilic esophagitis: early diagnosis is the key
AB, Muir;T, Brown-Whitehorn;B, Godwin;A, Cianferoni;
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 391-399
427 views Abstract
2017
lexico-stylistic choices and media ideology in newspaper reports on niger delta conflicts
;Chuka Fred Ononye
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 167-175
318 views DOI Abstract
2017
blended learning: student perception of face-to-face and online efl lessons
;Brenda M. Wright
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 64-71
239 views DOI Abstract
2017
personality type and translation performance of persian translator trainees
;Reza Shaki;Masood Khoshsaligheh
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 360-370
147 views DOI Abstract
2017
english interjections as a word class: a tri-stratal description
;Yi Jing
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 127-130
35 views DOI Abstract
2017
interpreting the readability in simplified editions of children’s literature from a thematic perspective: a case study on alice’s adventures in wonderland
;Tingjia Wang
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 201-205
212 views DOI Abstract
2017
the effects of pragmatic instruction on the pragmatic awareness and production of korean university students
;Hyekyeng Kim
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 371-380
29 views DOI Abstract
2017
negotiating social identity through questions in casual conversations: a critical discourse analysis
;Zulfa Sakhiyya
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 311-318
282 views DOI Abstract
2017
unraveling relatively unclear stories: a narrative analysis of student-teachers’ identity work
;Joseph Ernest Mambu
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 172-183
304 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
30.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #16,947 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

30.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

61.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.