Cancer management and research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#986 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

Cancer management and research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim
Short Name Cancer Manag Res
Abbreviated Name cancer management and research
ISSN 1179-1322
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.dovepress.com/cancer-management-and-research-journal
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (31 total)

2015
Afatinib for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer
Monika Joshi;Syed M Rizvi;Chandra P Belani and
Vol. 7 , pp. 75-82
471 views DOI Abstract
2018
Gene expression of hENT1, dCK, CDA, dCMPD and topoisomerase IIα as an indicator of chemotherapy response in AML treated with cytarabine and daunorubicin
B, Kulsoom;TS, Shamsi;NA, Afsar;
Vol. Volume 10 , pp. 5573-5589
458 views Abstract
2015
Afatinib for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer
Monika Joshi;Syed M Rizvi;Chandra P Belani;
Vol. 7 , pp. 75--82
426 views DOI Abstract
2015
Afatinib for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer
Vol. 7 , pp. 75--82
426 views DOI Abstract
2016
Treatment patterns, health state, and health care resource utilization of patients with radioactive iodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer
Vol. 8 , pp. 67--76
408 views DOI Abstract
2016
Treatment patterns, health state, and health care resource utilization of patients with radioactive iodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer
Andrew G Gianoukakis;Natalia M Flores;Corey L Pelletier;Anna Forsythe;Gregory R Wolfe;Matthew H Taylor;
Vol. 8 , pp. 67--76
396 views DOI Abstract
2016
Treatment patterns, health state, and health care resource utilization of patients with radioactive iodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer
Andrew G Gianoukakis;Natalia M Flores;Corey L Pelletier;Anna Forsythe;Gregory R Wolfe;Matthew H Taylor and
Vol. 8 , pp. 67-76
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
A prospective study on urine alkalization with an oral regimen consisting of sodium bicarbonate and acetazolamide in patients receiving high-dose methotrexate.
Reed, Daniel R;Pierce, Eric J;Sen, Jeremy M;Keng, Michael K;
Vol. 11 , pp. 8065-8072
357 views DOI Abstract
2018
Gene expression of , , , and topoisomerase IIα as an indicator of chemotherapy response in AML treated with cytarabine and daunorubicin.
Kulsoom, Bibi;Shamsi, Tahir Sultan;Afsar, Nasir Ali;
Vol. 10 , pp. 5573-5589
355 views DOI Abstract
2010
Frequency of heterozygous TET2 deletions in myeloproliferative neoplasms
Tripodi, Joseph;Hoffman, Ronald;Najfeld, Vesna;al, et;
Vol. 2010 , No. default , pp. 219-223
354 views Abstract
View All 31 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
50
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.