Indexed in Journament

Cancer management and research

ISSN 1179-1322· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,216 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
31 Articles
Scores higher than 82.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Cancer Manag Res
Abbreviated Name cancer management and research
ISSN 1179-1322
URL https://www.dovepress.com/cancer-management-and-research-journal

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 35.0 19.1
Timeliness 20.0 9.2
Diversity 31.1 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 8.6 7.8
Content Distribution 69.9 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (31)

2015
Afatinib for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer
Monika Joshi;Syed M Rizvi;Chandra P Belani and
Vol. 7 , pp. 75-82
543 views DOI Abstract
2018
Gene expression of hENT1, dCK, CDA, dCMPD and topoisomerase IIα as an indicator of chemotherapy response in AML treated with cytarabine and daunorubicin
B, Kulsoom;TS, Shamsi;NA, Afsar;
Vol. Volume 10 , pp. 5573-5589
503 views Abstract
2015
Afatinib for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer
Monika Joshi;Syed M Rizvi;Chandra P Belani;
Vol. 7 , pp. 75--82
493 views DOI Abstract
2016
Treatment patterns, health state, and health care resource utilization of patients with radioactive iodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer
Vol. 8 , pp. 67--76
466 views DOI Abstract
2015
Afatinib for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer
Vol. 7 , pp. 75--82
463 views DOI Abstract
2016
Treatment patterns, health state, and health care resource utilization of patients with radioactive iodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer
Andrew G Gianoukakis;Natalia M Flores;Corey L Pelletier;Anna Forsythe;Gregory R Wolfe;Matthew H Taylor;
Vol. 8 , pp. 67--76
436 views DOI Abstract
2016
Treatment patterns, health state, and health care resource utilization of patients with radioactive iodine refractory differentiated thyroid cancer
Andrew G Gianoukakis;Natalia M Flores;Corey L Pelletier;Anna Forsythe;Gregory R Wolfe;Matthew H Taylor and
Vol. 8 , pp. 67-76
433 views DOI Abstract
2018
Gene expression of , , , and topoisomerase IIα as an indicator of chemotherapy response in AML treated with cytarabine and daunorubicin.
Kulsoom, Bibi;Shamsi, Tahir Sultan;Afsar, Nasir Ali;
Vol. 10 , pp. 5573-5589
417 views DOI Abstract
2019
A prospective study on urine alkalization with an oral regimen consisting of sodium bicarbonate and acetazolamide in patients receiving high-dose methotrexate.
Reed, Daniel R;Pierce, Eric J;Sen, Jeremy M;Keng, Michael K;
Vol. 11 , pp. 8065-8072
405 views DOI Abstract
2010
Frequency of heterozygous TET2 deletions in myeloproliferative neoplasms
Tripodi, Joseph;Hoffman, Ronald;Najfeld, Vesna;al, et;
Vol. 2010 , No. default , pp. 219-223
390 views Abstract
2023
Potential of Indonesian Herbal as an Anti-Cancer Therapy: A Systemic Review of in vitro Studies.
Permatasanti, Ayu;Hidayat, Wahyu;
Vol. 15 , pp. 837-850
103 views DOI Abstract
2022
Erratum to: SDC2 and TFPI2 Methylation in Stool Samples as an Integrated Biomarker for Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer (Cancer Manag Res. (2021), 13, 3601–3617)
Zhang, W.
Vol. 14 , pp. 1845-1846
78 views DOI
2020
Effect of COVID-19 Epidemic on Delay of Diagnosis and Treatment Path for Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.
Yang, Youqi;Shen, Chunying;Hu, Chaosu;
Vol. 12 , pp. 3859-3864
257 views DOI Abstract
2020
Circular RNA Profiling Reveals That circRNA_104433 Regulates Cell Growth by Targeting miR-497-5p in Gastric Cancer.
Wei, Weiyuan;Mo, Xianwei;Yan, Linhai;Huang, Mingwei;Yang, Yang;Jin, Qinwen;Zhong, Huage;Cao, Wenlong;Wu, Kun;Wu, Liucheng;Li, Zhao;Wang, Tingan;Qin, Yuzhou;Chen, Jiansi;
Vol. 12 , pp. 15-30
353 views DOI Abstract
2020
NSD2 Promotes Renal Cancer Progression Through Stimulating Akt/Erk Signaling.
Han, Xu;Piao, Lianhua;Xu, Xiaoshuang;Luo, Fengbao;Liu, Zhiwei;He, Xiaozhou;
Vol. 12 , pp. 375-383
256 views DOI Abstract
2020
Prevention of Procedural Hypertension in the Irreversible Electroporation Ablation of Liver and Pancreatic Tumors Based on Distance from the Adrenal Gland
G, Fang;L, Niu;J, Chen;
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 71-78
371 views Abstract
2019
A prospective study on urine alkalization with an oral regimen consisting of sodium bicarbonate and acetazolamide in patients receiving high-dose methotrexate.
Reed, Daniel R;Pierce, Eric J;Sen, Jeremy M;Keng, Michael K;
Vol. 11 , pp. 8065-8072
405 views DOI Abstract
2019
Predictors of health care use in Australian cancer patients.
Rana, Rezwanul Hasan;Alam, Khorshed;Gow, Jeff;Ralph, Nicholas;
Vol. 11 , pp. 6941-6957
315 views DOI Abstract
2019
Intensity-modulated carbon-ion radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated photon-based radiation therapy in locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison
Lei Wang;Jiyi Hu;Xiaoli Liu;Weiwei Wang;Lin Kong;Jiade J Lu;
Vol. 11 , pp. 7767--7777
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
Intensity-modulated carbon-ion radiation therapy versus intensity-modulated photon-based radiation therapy in locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison
Vol. 11 , pp. 7767--7777
283 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,216 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

31.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

69.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.