Indexed in Journament

turkish journal of family medicine and primary care

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
43.7 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #551 of 33,995 indexed journals
35 Articles
Accessibility 50
Engagement 31
The Journament Score combines content quality, publication ethics and transparency, editorial standards, publication regularity, accessibility and reader engagement into a single 0–100 figure. It is recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed.

About This Journal

Short Name turkish journal of family medicine and primary care
Abbreviated Name turkish journal of family medicine and primary care
URL https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tjfmpc

Publications Per Year

Articles (35)

2019
Prenatal Breastfeeding Training in Turkish Women: How are the effects?
Vol. 13 , pp. 183--190
728 views DOI Abstract
2019
DETERMINING THE PREVALENCE OF OBESITY AND THE EFFECTIVE RISK FACTORS IN ADOLESCENTS IN THE AGE GROUP OF 15-18 YEARS AT A SECONDARY SCHOOL
Vol. 13 , pp. 203--211
651 views DOI Abstract
2019
DETERMINING THE PREVALENCE OF OBESITY AND THE EFFECTIVE RISK FACTORS IN ADOLESCENTS IN THE AGE GROUP OF 15-18 YEARS AT A SECONDARY SCHOOL
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 203-211
586 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of Follow-Up Visit Frequencies on Weight Lost: A Historical Cohort Study
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 191-195
558 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prenatal Breastfeeding Training in Turkish Women: How are the effects?
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 183-190
521 views DOI Abstract
2019
Attitudes of Physicians and Nurses Towards the Disabled and Awareness of Applications for the Disabled in a University Hospital
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 129-141
487 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Different Dimension in Promoting Breastfeeding: Paternal Support
Vol. 13 , pp. 227--231
477 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of Follow-Up Visit Frequencies on Weight Lost: A Historical Cohort Study
Vol. 13 , pp. 191--195
475 views DOI Abstract
2019
Is routine detailed screening tests in healthy children necessary?
Vol. 13 , pp. 177--182
469 views DOI Abstract
2019
Meta-Analysis Steps and Reporting
Vol. 13 , pp. 232--240
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Different Dimension in Promoting Breastfeeding: Paternal Support
Vol. 13 , pp. 227--231
477 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Frequency of Tobacco and Tobacco Product Use in Medical Faculty Students
Vol. 13 , pp. 219--226
391 views DOI Abstract
2019
Factors Affecting the Presence of Fever in Children Brought to the Emergency Department with Fever Complaint
Vol. 13 , pp. 212--218
432 views DOI Abstract
2019
DETERMINING THE PREVALENCE OF OBESITY AND THE EFFECTIVE RISK FACTORS IN ADOLESCENTS IN THE AGE GROUP OF 15-18 YEARS AT A SECONDARY SCHOOL
Vol. 13 , pp. 203--211
651 views DOI Abstract
2019
Examination of Factors Affecting to Secondary Traumatic Stress, Cynicism and Burnout in Healthcare Professionals
Vol. 13 , pp. 196--202
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of Follow-Up Visit Frequencies on Weight Lost: A Historical Cohort Study
Vol. 13 , pp. 191--195
475 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prenatal Breastfeeding Training in Turkish Women: How are the effects?
Vol. 13 , pp. 183--190
728 views DOI Abstract
2019
Is routine detailed screening tests in healthy children necessary?
Vol. 13 , pp. 177--182
469 views DOI Abstract
2019
What Do the Adults Know About the Cancer Screening Programs?
Vol. 13 , pp. 167--176
426 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
43.7/100 · Below Average
Ranked #551 of 33,995

Overall Quality Score

43.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

39.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.