journal of istanbul veterinary sciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#7508 / 33,982
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

journal of istanbul veterinary sciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name journal of istanbul veterinary sciences
Abbreviated Name journal of istanbul veterinary sciences
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (31 total)

2014
awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension among adult population in the federation of bosnia and herzegovina over the past decade
;Aida Pilav;Vildana Doder;Suada Branković
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. -
503 views DOI Abstract
2013
intermittent attendance at breast cancer screening
;Padraic Fleming;Sinead O'Neill;Miriam Owens;Therese Mooney;Patricia Fitzpatrick
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. e14-e14
482 views DOI Abstract
2013
correlation between body mass index and waist circumference in nigerian adults: implication as indicators of health status
;Shalom Nwodo Chinedu;Olubanke O. Ogunlana;Dominic E. Azuh;Emeka E.J. Iweala;Israel S. Afolabi;Chidi C. Uhuegbu;Mercy E. Idachaba;Victor C. Osamor
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. e16-e16
429 views DOI Abstract
2019
Examination of the carcass in terms of quality and sanitation in broiler chickens fed with marine hydrobionts
Nina Dankevych and
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 17-20
409 views DOI Abstract
2019
Determination of renal blood flow with Doppler ultrasound and the hypertension prevalence and acid-base level in dogs with chronic renal failure
Lora Koenhemsi;Remzi Gönül and
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 6-12
404 views DOI Abstract
2019
Examination of the carcass in terms of quality and sanitation in broiler chickens fed with marine hydrobionts
Nina Dankevych;
Vol. 3 , pp. 17--20
383 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of dietary fat source, breed and vitamin E level on lipid oxidation of muscles from sheep
Gülcan DEMİREL;
Vol. 3 , pp. 1--5
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
Determination of renal blood flow with Doppler ultrasound and the hypertension prevalence and acid-base level in dogs with chronic renal failure
Lora Koenhemsi;Remzi Gönül;
Vol. 3 , pp. 6--12
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of dietary fat source, breed and vitamin E level on lipid oxidation of muscles from sheep
Gülcan DEMİREL and
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 1-5
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
The bite of a rat infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa in laboratory conditions: An uncommon case
Muhamed Katica;Alisa Smajović;Nasreldin Hassan Ahmed;Behija Dukić;Rusmir Baljić and
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 13-16
358 views DOI Abstract
View All 31 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.