international journal of engineering and applied sciences | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3393 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

international journal of engineering and applied sciences

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name international journal of engineering and applied sciences
Abbreviated Name international journal of engineering and applied sciences
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (64 total)

2019
Modal Analysis of Lenses Used in Automotive Lighting Industry and Obtaining MAC Matrix
Erhan Ay;Barış Ediz;Birhat Sönmezay;Sevda Telli Çetin;
Vol. 11 , pp. 401--413
336 views DOI Abstract
2019
Modal Analysis of Lenses Used in Automotive Lighting Industry and Obtaining MAC Matrix
Erhan Ay;Barış Ediz;Birhat Sönmezay;Sevda Telli Çetin and
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 401-413
323 views DOI Abstract
2019
Finite Element Model of Functionally Graded Nanobeam for Free Vibration Analysis
Büşra Uzun;Mustafa Özgür Yaylı;
Vol. 11 , pp. 387--400
312 views DOI Abstract
2017
memorias sociales y familiares de la dictadura cívico-militar: narrativas biográficas de integrantes de la asociación abuelas de plaza de mayo
;Miriam Elizabeth Kriger;Luciana Cecilia Guglielmo
Vol. 40 , No. 1Supl , pp. 45-63
310 views DOI Abstract
2019
Finite Element Model of Functionally Graded Nanobeam for Free Vibration Analysis
Büşra Uzun;Mustafa Özgür Yaylı and
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 387-400
299 views DOI Abstract
2019
Vibro-Electrical Behavior of a Viscoelastic Piezo-Nanowire in an Elastic Substrate Considering Stress Nonlocality and Microstructural Size-Dependent Effects
Mohammad Malikan;
Vol. 11 , pp. 369--386
263 views DOI Abstract
2019
Vibro-Electrical Behavior of a Viscoelastic Piezo-Nanowire in an Elastic Substrate Considering Stress Nonlocality and Microstructural Size-Dependent Effects
Mohammad Malikan and
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 369-386
261 views DOI Abstract
2016
sociomaterial conditions in knowledge production and the reconfiguration of skills in three laboratories at universidad del atlántico
;Kelly Escobar Jiménez;Angélica Polo Lozano;Geraldine Carreño Laguado;Roque Manuel Jiménez Sumalave
Vol. 39 , No. 2 , pp. 135-162
240 views DOI Abstract
2015
control of the population growth and women in mexico: international organizations, civil society and public policies
;María Ileana García Gossio
Vol. 38 , No. 2 , pp. 93-111
238 views DOI Abstract
2005
la violencia simbólica en la revuelta estudiantil. el movimiento estudiantil de antropología y sociología en la universidad de caldas
;Paulo César León Palacios
, No. 24 , pp. 185-213
237 views Abstract
View All 64 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.