Indexed in Journament

international journal of engineering and applied sciences

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
25.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #26,544 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
64 Articles
Scores higher than 9.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name international journal of engineering and applied sciences
Abbreviated Name international journal of engineering and applied sciences

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 31.5
Innovation 39.0
Community Impact 9.3
Content Distribution 35.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for international journal of engineering and applied sciences
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 31.5 24.4
Innovation 39.0 25.7
Community Impact 9.3 5.8
Content Distribution 35.7 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (64)

2019
Modal Analysis of Lenses Used in Automotive Lighting Industry and Obtaining MAC Matrix
Vol. 11 , pp. 401--413
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
Finite Element Model of Functionally Graded Nanobeam for Free Vibration Analysis
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 387-400
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
Modal Analysis of Lenses Used in Automotive Lighting Industry and Obtaining MAC Matrix
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 401-413
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
Finite Element Model of Functionally Graded Nanobeam for Free Vibration Analysis
Vol. 11 , pp. 387--400
363 views DOI Abstract
2017
memorias sociales y familiares de la dictadura cívico-militar: narrativas biográficas de integrantes de la asociación abuelas de plaza de mayo
Vol. 40 , No. 1Supl , pp. 45-63
359 views DOI Abstract
2016
sociomaterial conditions in knowledge production and the reconfiguration of skills in three laboratories at universidad del atlántico
Vol. 39 , No. 2 , pp. 135-162
298 views DOI Abstract
2015
control of the population growth and women in mexico: international organizations, civil society and public policies
Vol. 38 , No. 2 , pp. 93-111
272 views DOI Abstract
2019
Modal Analysis of Lenses Used in Automotive Lighting Industry and Obtaining MAC Matrix
Vol. 11 , pp. 401--413
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
Finite Element Model of Functionally Graded Nanobeam for Free Vibration Analysis
Vol. 11 , pp. 387--400
363 views DOI Abstract
2019
Modal Analysis of Lenses Used in Automotive Lighting Industry and Obtaining MAC Matrix
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 401-413
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
Finite Element Model of Functionally Graded Nanobeam for Free Vibration Analysis
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 387-400
371 views DOI Abstract
2018
notas editoriales
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. 11-28
25 views Abstract
2018
de la investigación acción a la democracia del conocimiento. cartagena, 1977-2017
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. 227-236
151 views DOI Abstract
2017
memorias sociales y familiares de la dictadura cívico-militar: narrativas biográficas de integrantes de la asociación abuelas de plaza de mayo
Vol. 40 , No. 1Supl , pp. 45-63
359 views DOI Abstract
2017
lugar de dudas. sobre la práctica del análisis histórico. breviario de inseguridades, de r. silva
Vol. 40 , No. 1 , pp. 297-301
110 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
25.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #26,544 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

25.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

31.5/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

39.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

35.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.