Indexed in Journament

ieee transactions on image processing : a publication of the ieee signal processing society

ISSN 1941-0042· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
50.5 / 100
Journament Score
Average
Ranked #51 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
51 Articles
Scores higher than 99.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name ieee trans image process
Abbreviated Name ieee trans image process
ISSN 1941-0042
URL http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/servlet/opac?punumber=83

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for ieee transactions on image processing : a publication of the ieee signal processing society
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 60.0 9.2
Diversity 77.8 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 12.1 7.8
Content Distribution 75.1 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (51)

2020
KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessment.
433 views DOI Abstract
2013
A novel fractal image compression scheme with block classification and sorting based on Pearson's correlation coefficient.
Vol. 22 , No. 9 , pp. 3690-702
429 views DOI Abstract
2019
Attention-Based Pedestrian Attribute Analysis.
Vol. 28 , No. 12 , pp. 6126-6140
428 views DOI Abstract
2020
Personality-assisted Multi-task Learning for Generic and Personalized Image Aesthetics Assessment.
425 views DOI Abstract
2019
Magic-Wall: Visualizing Room Decoration by Enhanced Wall Segmentation.
Vol. 28 , No. 9 , pp. 4219-4232
422 views DOI Abstract
2020
Modality Compensation Network: Cross-Modal Adaptation for Action Recognition.
412 views DOI Abstract
2009
Noniterative MAP reconstruction using sparse matrix representations.
Vol. 18 , No. 9 , pp. 2085-99
391 views DOI Abstract
2019
Edge-Sensitive Human Cutout with Hierarchical Granularity and Loopy Matting Guidance.
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
EleAtt-RNN: Adding Attentiveness to Neurons in Recurrent Neural Networks.
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
SiGAN: Siamese Generative Adversarial Network for Identity-Preserving Face Hallucination.
367 views DOI Abstract
2020
Semantic Segmentation with Context Encoding and Multi-Path Decoding.
260 views DOI Abstract
2020
Image Captioning with End-to-end Attribute Detection and Subsequent Attributes Prediction.
299 views DOI Abstract
2020
Modality Compensation Network: Cross-Modal Adaptation for Action Recognition.
412 views DOI Abstract
2020
Deep Video Super-Resolution using HR Optical Flow Estimation.
325 views DOI Abstract
2020
KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessment.
433 views DOI Abstract
2020
Personality-assisted Multi-task Learning for Generic and Personalized Image Aesthetics Assessment.
425 views DOI Abstract
2020
Connecting Image Denoising and High-Level Vision Tasks via Deep Learning.
312 views DOI Abstract
2019
Magic-Wall: Visualizing Room Decoration by Enhanced Wall Segmentation.
Vol. 28 , No. 9 , pp. 4219-4232
422 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
50.5/100 · Average
Ranked #51 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

50.5/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

77.8/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

75.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.