bilimsel tamamlayıcı tıp regülasyon ve nöral terapi dergisi | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3736 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

bilimsel tamamlayıcı tıp regülasyon ve nöral terapi dergisi

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name bilimsel tamamlayıcı tıp regülasyon ve nöral terapi dergisi
Abbreviated Name bilimsel tamamlayıcı tıp regülasyon ve nöral terapi dergisi
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (61 total)

2016
a case of uveal colobomas showing marked left-right difference in diabetic retinopathy
;Takeshi Moriya;Ryosuke Ochi;Yukihiro Imagawa;Bumpei Sato;Seita Morishita;Masahiro Tonari;Masanori Fukumoto;Hiroyuki Suzuki;Takatoshi Kobayashi;Teruyo Kida;Tsunehiko Ikeda
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 167-173
447 views DOI Abstract
2010
tonic pupil and corneal anesthesia after vitrectomy and encircling band for retinal detachment in an ex-premature child
;Xavier Valldeperas;Alexandra Arango;Ana Blazquez;Mario Rosario Romano
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 66-70
329 views DOI Abstract
2016
heads-up macular surgery with a 27-gauge microincision vitrectomy system and minimal illumination
;Hiroshi Kunikata;Toshiaki Abe;Toru Nakazawa
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 265-269
291 views DOI Abstract
2012
subretinal fibrosis in stargardt’s disease with fundus flavimaculatus and abca4 gene mutation
;Settimio Rossi;Francesco Testa;Marcella Attanasio;Ada Orrico;Antonella de Benedictis;Michele Della Corte;Francesca Simonelli
Vol. 3 , No. 3 , pp. 410-417
289 views DOI Abstract
2014
trimanual anterior vitrectomy: a novel technique to manage vitreous loss during phacoemulsification
;Michael G. Taggart;R. Grant Morshedi;Balamurali K. Ambati
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 373-379
284 views DOI Abstract
2014
choroidal excavation in vogt-koyanagi-harada disease
;Noriyasu Hashida;Andrew Fok;Kohji Nishida
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 222-225
280 views DOI Abstract
2017
a case of childhood-onset giant cell tumor that caused optic nerve atrophy in both eyes
;Masahiro Tonari;Junko Matsuo;Hidehiro Oku;Jun Sugasawa;Tsunehiko Ikeda;Kazunori Tatsuzawa;Tomoaki Fujita
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 301-307
231 views DOI Abstract
2017
corneal collagen cross-linking combined with an artiflex iris-fixated anterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation in a patient with progressive keratoconus
;Sharif Hashmani;Nauman Hashmani;Roha Saeed Memon
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 482-488
231 views DOI Abstract
2016
non-descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for bullous keratopathy in buphthalmic eye
;Koji Hirano;Shu Kachi;Masako Matsuura;Kazuhide Kawase;Won Sun Park
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 279-284
230 views DOI Abstract
2016
blockade of tumor necrosis factor-alpha: a role for adalimumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration refractory to anti-angiogenesis therapy
;Beatriz Fernández-Vega;Álvaro Fernández-Vega;Carlos Mario Rangel;Javier Nicieza;Eva Villota-Deleu;José A. Vega;Ronald M. Sanchez-Avila
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 154-162
222 views DOI Abstract
View All 61 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.