jmir dermatology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2191 / 33,951
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

jmir dermatology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name jmir dermatology
Abbreviated Name jmir dermatology
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://derma.jmir.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (53 total)

2018
Impact of an Intrainstitutional Teledermatology Service: Mixed-Methods Case Study
Trevor Champagne;Trevor Champagne;Peter G Rossos;Veronica Kirk;Emily Seto;
Vol. 1 , pp. e11923--
616 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluating Web-Based Platforms and Traditional Methods for Recruiting Tattoo Artists: Descriptive Survey Research Study
Jessica LC Sapp;Jessica LC Sapp;Robert L Vogel;Joseph Telfair;Julie K Reagan;
Vol. 2 , pp. e14151--
615 views DOI Abstract
2018
College Students’ Attitudes and Behaviors Related to Sun Safety and Appearance in Relation to Health Information-Seeking Behavior and Social Media Use: Cross-Sectional Study
Corey H Basch;Corey H Basch;Grace C Hillyer;Rachelle-Ann Romero;Sarah A MacLean;Danna Ethan;
Vol. 1 , pp. e10984--
578 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evaluation of the Level of Evidence Supporting the Recommendations Constituting the American Academy of Dermatology Clinical Practice Guidelines: Cross-Sectional Analysis
Matt Vassar;
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. e17370-
577 views DOI Abstract
2018
Skin and Wound Map From 23,453 Nursing Home Resident Records: Relative Prevalence Study
Yunghan Au;Yunghan Au;Marcon Laforet;Kirsten Talbot;Sheila C Wang;
Vol. 1 , pp. e11875--
558 views DOI Abstract
2019
Determinants of the Intention to Use Teledermatology: Evidence From Dermatologists and Primary Care Physicians
Mercedes Sendín-Martín;Mercedes Sendín-Martín;Ana Jiménez-Zarco;Francesc Saigí-Rubió;Julian Conejo-Mir;Jose Juan Pereyra-Rodriguez;
Vol. 2 , pp. e14459--
541 views DOI Abstract
2018
Facebook Intervention for Young-Onset Melanoma Patients and Their Family Members: Pilot and Feasibility Study
Elliot J Coups;Elliot J Coups;Sharon L Manne;Sherry L Pagoto;Kevin R Criswell;James S Goydos and
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. e3-
540 views DOI Abstract
2020
Understanding Social Media Use and Engagement Among Dermatology Patients to Inform Dermatological Prevention and Care in Vietnam: Cross-sectional Study
Roger C M Ho;
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. e13424-
536 views DOI Abstract
2020
Skin Lesion Classification With Deep Convolutional Neural Network: Process Development and Validation
Amutha Al;
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. e18438-
519 views DOI Abstract
2020
Development of an Innovative Real-World Evidence Registry for the Herpes Simplex Virus: Case Study
Edward Meinert;
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. e16933-
519 views DOI Abstract
View All 53 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
50
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.