clinical medicine insights: blood disorders | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3425 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

clinical medicine insights: blood disorders

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name clinical medicine insights: blood disorders
Abbreviated Name clinical medicine insights: blood disorders
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (26 total)

2017
Thromboprophylaxis With Apixaban in Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery: Meta-Analysis and Trial-Sequential Analysis
Caldeira, Daniel;Rodrigues, Filipe B;Pinto, Fausto J;Ferreira, Joaquim J;Costa, João;
Vol. 10 , pp. -
284 views Abstract
2012
inhibited production of inos by murine j774 macrophages occurs via a phop-regulated differential expression of nfκb and ap-1
;Scott D. Hulme;Paul A. Barrow;Neil Foster
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
279 views DOI Abstract
2010
rhombencephalitis caused by listeria monocytogenes in humans and ruminants: a zoonosis on the rise?
;Anna Oevermann;Andreas Zurbriggen;Marc Vandevelde
Vol. 2010 , pp. -
275 views DOI
2016
using maldi-tof mass spectrometry to identify drug resistant staphylococcal isolates from nonhospital environments in brunei darussalam
;Ko S. Chong;Siti A. Shazali;Zhen Xu;Ronald R. Cutler;Adi Idris
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
269 views DOI Abstract
2015
breeding sites of aedes aegypti: potential dengue vectors in dire dawa, east ethiopia
;Dejene Getachew;Habte Tekie;Teshome Gebre-Michael;Meshesha Balkew;Akalu Mesfin
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
259 views DOI Abstract
2009
biogeography of tick-borne bhanja virus (bunyaviridae) in europe
;Zdenek Hubálek
Vol. 2009 , pp. -
252 views DOI Abstract
2011
influenza and bacterial pathogen coinfections in the 20th century
;Xuan-Yi Wang;Paul E. Kilgore;Kyung Ah Lim;Song-Mei Wang;Jeongseok Lee;Wei Deng;Mei-Qi Mo;Batmunkh Nyambat;Jing-Chen Ma;Michael O. Favorov;John D. Clemens
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
237 views DOI Abstract
2014
the impact of cooperative social organization on reducing the prevalence of malaria and intestinal parasite infections in awramba, a rural community in south gondar, ethiopia
;Gebeyehu Yihenew;Haileeyesus Adamu;Beyene Petros
Vol. 2014 , pp. -
234 views DOI Abstract
2011
immune modulation as adjunctive therapy for pneumocystis pneumonia
;Jing Wang;Terry W. Wright;Francis Gigliotti
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
222 views DOI Abstract
2010
global distribution, public health and clinical impact of the protozoan pathogen cryptosporidium
;Lorenza Putignani;Donato Menichella
Vol. 2010 , pp. -
214 views DOI Abstract
View All 26 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.