Indexed in Journament

clinical medicine insights: blood disorders

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,154 of 33,995 indexed journals
26 Articles
Accessibility 15
Engagement 30
The Journament Score combines content quality, publication ethics and transparency, editorial standards, publication regularity, accessibility and reader engagement into a single 0–100 figure. It is recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed.

About This Journal

Short Name clinical medicine insights: blood disorders
Abbreviated Name clinical medicine insights: blood disorders

Publications Per Year

Articles (26)

2017
Thromboprophylaxis With Apixaban in Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery: Meta-Analysis and Trial-Sequential Analysis
Vol. 10 , pp. -
311 views Abstract
2012
2010
rhombencephalitis caused by listeria monocytogenes in humans and ruminants: a zoonosis on the rise?
Vol. 2010 , pp. -
297 views DOI
2016
using maldi-tof mass spectrometry to identify drug resistant staphylococcal isolates from nonhospital environments in brunei darussalam
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
290 views DOI Abstract
2015
breeding sites of aedes aegypti: potential dengue vectors in dire dawa, east ethiopia
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
287 views DOI Abstract
2009
biogeography of tick-borne bhanja virus (bunyaviridae) in europe
Vol. 2009 , pp. -
277 views DOI Abstract
2011
influenza and bacterial pathogen coinfections in the 20th century
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
263 views DOI Abstract
2011
immune modulation as adjunctive therapy for pneumocystis pneumonia
Vol. 2011 , pp. -
247 views DOI Abstract
2010
global distribution, public health and clinical impact of the protozoan pathogen cryptosporidium
Vol. 2010 , pp. -
237 views DOI Abstract
2017
epidemiological and clinical parameters features of patients with clonorchiasis in the geum river basin, republic of korea
Vol. 2017 , pp. -
129 views DOI Abstract
2017
Thromboprophylaxis With Apixaban in Patients Undergoing Major Orthopedic Surgery: Meta-Analysis and Trial-Sequential Analysis
Vol. 10 , pp. -
311 views Abstract
2016
the optimal management of acute febrile encephalopathy in the aged patient: a systematic review
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
142 views DOI Abstract
2016
clinical significance of molecular diagnostic tools for bacterial bloodstream infections: a systematic review
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
151 views DOI Abstract
2016
using maldi-tof mass spectrometry to identify drug resistant staphylococcal isolates from nonhospital environments in brunei darussalam
Vol. 2016 , pp. -
290 views DOI Abstract
2015
breeding sites of aedes aegypti: potential dengue vectors in dire dawa, east ethiopia
Vol. 2015 , pp. -
287 views DOI Abstract
2012
emergence and spread of antimicrobial-resistant pathogens in an era of globalization
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
12 views DOI
2012
antibiotic resistance of escherichia coli serotypes from cochin estuary
Vol. 2012 , pp. -
103 views DOI Abstract
2012
Journament Score
38.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,154 of 33,995

Overall Quality Score

38.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.