Indexed in Journament

Thrombosis research

ISSN 1879-2472· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #19,616 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
61 Articles
Scores higher than 33.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Thromb Res
Abbreviated Name thrombosis research
ISSN 1879-2472
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/thrombosis-research

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Thrombosis research
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 20.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 8.6 13.4
Content Distribution 66.1 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (61)

2019
Management of elderly patients with immune thrombocytopenia: Real-world evidence from 451 patients older than 60 years.
Vol. 185 , pp. 88-95
416 views DOI Abstract
2019
Rivaroxaban versus warfarin treatment among morbidly obese patients with venous thromboembolism: Comparative effectiveness, safety, and costs.
Vol. 182 , pp. 159-166
374 views DOI Abstract
2017
primary lung carcinoid metastatic to the breast
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 223-228
359 views DOI Abstract
2020
ADAMTS13 activity, von Willebrand factor, factor VIII and D-dimers in COVID-19 inpatients.
Vol. 192 , pp. 174-175
342 views DOI
2018
pancreatocolonic fistulization secondary to pancreatic adenocarcinoma presenting as unexplained halitosis
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 72-75
335 views DOI Abstract
2017
stroke-like migraine attacks after radiation therapy syndrome: a case report and literature review
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. 610-614
330 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prothrombotic fibrin clot properties are associated with post-discharge venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients.
Vol. 182 , pp. 141-149
324 views DOI Abstract
2019
wassel type iii polydactyly
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 287-290
320 views Abstract
2018
massive mitral annular calcification mimicking intracardiac mass: multimodality approach to diagnosis
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 376-379
314 views Abstract
2024
WY-14643, a novel antiplatelet and antithrombotic agent targeting the GPIbα receptor.
Vol. 238 , pp. 41-51
105 views DOI Abstract
2020
ADAMTS13 activity, von Willebrand factor, factor VIII and D-dimers in COVID-19 inpatients.
Vol. 192 , pp. 174-175
342 views DOI
2020
A case of COVID-19 pneumonia with cerebral hemorrhage.
Vol. 193 , pp. 22-24
137 views DOI
2020
Venous and arterial thromboembolic complications in COVID-19 patients admitted to an academic hospital in Milan, Italy.
Vol. 191 , pp. 9-14
309 views DOI Abstract
2019
wassel type iii polydactyly
Vol. 14 , No. 2 , pp. 287-290
320 views Abstract
2019
Management of elderly patients with immune thrombocytopenia: Real-world evidence from 451 patients older than 60 years.
Vol. 185 , pp. 88-95
416 views DOI Abstract
2019
Testosterone treatment and association with thrombin generation and coagulation inhibition in Klinefelter syndrome: A cross-sectional study.
Vol. 182 , pp. 175-181
225 views DOI Abstract
2019
Providers' utilization and perceptions of warfarin dosing algorithms.
Vol. 183 , pp. 4-12
287 views DOI Abstract
2019
Rivaroxaban versus warfarin treatment among morbidly obese patients with venous thromboembolism: Comparative effectiveness, safety, and costs.
Vol. 182 , pp. 159-166
374 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #19,616 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

32.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

66.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.