Indexed in Journament

european heart journal - quality of care and clinical outcomes

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.1 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #1,541 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
77 Articles
Scores higher than 94.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name european heart journal - quality of care and clinical outcomes
Abbreviated Name european heart journal - quality of care and clinical outcomes

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 90.0
Diversity 61.1
Innovation 25.5
Community Impact 2.1
Content Distribution 25.0
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for european heart journal - quality of care and clinical outcomes
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 22.5
Timeliness 90.0 3.0
Diversity 61.1 22.7
Innovation 25.5 24.1
Community Impact 2.1 4.2
Content Distribution 25.0 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (77)

2013
as profissionais do sexo e a justiça do trabalho
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 113-140
684 views Abstract
2015
twenty years wandering (but not in the desert): brazil’s 1967-1989 absence from un peacekeeping
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 6-31
271 views Abstract
2016
um “choque de ordens”: uma análise sobre o controle do espaço público na orla carioca
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 163-190
263 views Abstract
2016
the misadventures of a narrator and his servant: machado de assis and the characters of “a semana”.
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 606-628
246 views Abstract
2013
the forgotten voices of the militares cassados in brazil
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 313-344
246 views Abstract
2015
da favela para o mundo: articulações entre o local e o global no funk brasileiro2
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 55-81
244 views Abstract
2026
Risk-Score Guided Estimation of Absolute Benefit From Beta-blockers after Myocardial Infarction in Patients Without Heart Failure
DOI Abstract
2026
Pericoronary inflammation beyond stenosis: does sex modify its prognostic significance?
DOI Abstract
2026
Reading Between the Waves: What Does AI-ECG Capture When Estimating NT-proBNP?
2 views DOI
2026
COVID-19 Vaccination and Risk of Post–COVID-19 Cardiovascular Disease: A Population-Based Cohort and Target Trial Emulation Study
10 views DOI Abstract
2026
The effect of integrated lifestyle modification on quality of life and cost-effectiveness in atrial fibrillation ablation – results from the POP-AF RCT
14 views DOI Abstract
2026
Recording of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy and Subsequent Cardiovascular Risk Among New Zealand Women
29 views DOI Abstract
2026
Noninferiority as a Moving Target in LAAC Trials
15 views DOI
2026
2026
Comparative Outcomes of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Aspirin After Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation
13 views DOI Abstract
2026
Deterministic Economic Modelling Study of Tafamidis in Transthyretin Amyloid Cardiomyopathy Across Four European Healthcare Systems
18 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
40.1/100 · Below Average
Ranked #1,541 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

40.1/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

61.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

25.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

25.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.