archives of gerontology and geriatrics | Journament

Journal Ranking

#894 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

archives of gerontology and geriatrics

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name arch gerontol geriatr
Abbreviated Name archives of gerontology and geriatrics
ISSN 1872-6976
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/archives-of-gerontology-and-geriatrics
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

2019
Modifiable factors associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms in nursing homes: The impact of unmet needs and psychotropic drugs.
Ferreira, Ana Rita;Simões, Mário R;Moreira, Emília;Guedes, Joana;Fernandes, Lia;
Vol. 86 , pp. 103919
438 views DOI Abstract
2019
Corrigendum to “Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis” [Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 81 (March–April)(2019)209–214](S0167494318302450)(10.1016/j.archger.2018.12.013)
Caldeira, D.
Vol. 83 , pp. 338
421 views DOI
2019
Mediating effect of social support on the relationship between resilience and burden in caregivers of people with dementia.
Ruisoto, Pablo;Contador, Israel;Fernández-Calvo, Bernardino;Serra, Lídia;Jenaro, Cristina;Flores, Noelia;Ramos, Francisco;Rivera-Navarro, Jesús;
Vol. 86 , pp. 103952
384 views DOI Abstract
Psychometric evaluation of the patient perspective on care and rehabilitation scale in geriatric patients.
Erci, Behice;Yildirim, Hilal;Isik, Kevser;
Vol. 81 , pp. 84-90
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
Caldeira, D.
Vol. 81 , pp. 209-214
368 views DOI
Survival strategies of elderly women in Ngangelizwe Township, Mthatha, South Africa: Livelihoods, social networks and income.
Sidloyi, Sinethemba S;Bomela, Nolunkcwe J;
Vol. 62 , pp. 43-52
330 views DOI Abstract
2020
Challenges and needs of informal caregivers in elderly care: Qualitative research in four European countries, the TRACE project
Akgun-Citak, E.
Vol. 87 , pp. 0-0
327 views DOI
1970
Influential factors affecting age-related self-overestimation of step-over ability: focusing on frequency of going outdoors and executive function
Sakurai R;Fujiwara Y;Sakuma N;Suzuki H;Ishihara M;Higuchi T;Imanaka K;;
Vol. 59 , No. 3 , pp. -
327 views Abstract
2008
Environmental and social determinants of aging perception in metropolitan and rural areas of Southern Italy
Lucchetti, M.
Vol. 46 , pp. 349-357
317 views DOI
2020
Association between simple evaluation of eating and swallowing function and mortality among patients with advanced dementia in nursing homes: 1-year prospective cohort study
Hoshino, D.
Vol. 87 , pp. 0-0
310 views DOI
View All 21 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.