Indexed in Journament

archives of gerontology and geriatrics

ISSN 1872-6976· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.9 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #6,033 of 33,995 indexed journals
21 Articles
Accessibility 35
Engagement 31
The Journament Score combines content quality, publication ethics and transparency, editorial standards, publication regularity, accessibility and reader engagement into a single 0–100 figure. It is recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed.

About This Journal

Short Name arch gerontol geriatr
Abbreviated Name archives of gerontology and geriatrics
ISSN 1872-6976
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/archives-of-gerontology-and-geriatrics

Publications Per Year

Articles (21)

2019
Modifiable factors associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms in nursing homes: The impact of unmet needs and psychotropic drugs.
Ferreira, Ana Rita;Simões, Mário R;Moreira, Emília;Guedes, Joana;Fernandes, Lia;
Vol. 86 , pp. 103919
476 views DOI Abstract
2019
Corrigendum to “Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis” [Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 81 (March–April)(2019)209–214](S0167494318302450)(10.1016/j.archger.2018.12.013)
Caldeira, D.
Vol. 83 , pp. 338
452 views DOI
2019
Mediating effect of social support on the relationship between resilience and burden in caregivers of people with dementia.
Ruisoto, Pablo;Contador, Israel;Fernández-Calvo, Bernardino;Serra, Lídia;Jenaro, Cristina;Flores, Noelia;Ramos, Francisco;Rivera-Navarro, Jesús;
Vol. 86 , pp. 103952
442 views DOI Abstract
Psychometric evaluation of the patient perspective on care and rehabilitation scale in geriatric patients.
Erci, Behice;Yildirim, Hilal;Isik, Kevser;
Vol. 81 , pp. 84-90
411 views DOI Abstract
2019
Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
Caldeira, D.
Vol. 81 , pp. 209-214
403 views DOI
Survival strategies of elderly women in Ngangelizwe Township, Mthatha, South Africa: Livelihoods, social networks and income.
Sidloyi, Sinethemba S;Bomela, Nolunkcwe J;
Vol. 62 , pp. 43-52
391 views DOI Abstract
1970
Influential factors affecting age-related self-overestimation of step-over ability: focusing on frequency of going outdoors and executive function
Sakurai R;Fujiwara Y;Sakuma N;Suzuki H;Ishihara M;Higuchi T;Imanaka K;;
Vol. 59 , No. 3 , pp. -
381 views Abstract
2020
Challenges and needs of informal caregivers in elderly care: Qualitative research in four European countries, the TRACE project
Akgun-Citak, E.
Vol. 87 , pp. 0-0
361 views DOI
2020
Association between simple evaluation of eating and swallowing function and mortality among patients with advanced dementia in nursing homes: 1-year prospective cohort study
Hoshino, D.
Vol. 87 , pp. 0-0
344 views DOI
2008
Environmental and social determinants of aging perception in metropolitan and rural areas of Southern Italy
Lucchetti, M.
Vol. 46 , pp. 349-357
344 views DOI
2020
The mediating role of low-grade inflammation on the prospective association between sleep and cognitive function in older men and women: 8-year follow-up from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing
Jackowska, M.
Vol. 87 , pp. 0-0
152 views DOI
2020
Challenges and needs of informal caregivers in elderly care: Qualitative research in four European countries, the TRACE project
Akgun-Citak, E.
Vol. 87 , pp. 0-0
361 views DOI
2020
Improving gesture-based interaction between an assistive bathing robot and older adults via user training on the gestural commands
Werner, C.
Vol. 87 , pp. 0-0
208 views DOI
2020
Association between simple evaluation of eating and swallowing function and mortality among patients with advanced dementia in nursing homes: 1-year prospective cohort study
Hoshino, D.
Vol. 87 , pp. 0-0
344 views DOI
2020
Progress in advance care planning among nursing home residents dying with advanced dementia—Does it make any difference in end-of-life care?
Konttila, T.
Vol. 86 , pp. 0-0
238 views DOI
2020
Modifiable factors associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms in nursing homes: The impact of unmet needs and psychotropic drugs
Ferreira, A.
Vol. 86 , pp. 0-0
302 views DOI
2019
Progress in advance care planning among nursing home residents dying with advanced dementia-Does it make any difference in end-of-life care?
Konttila, Tarja;Finne-Soveri, Ulla Harriet;Leskinen, Riitta;Niemelä, Katriina;Antikainen, Riitta;
Vol. 86 , pp. 103955
329 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mediating effect of social support on the relationship between resilience and burden in caregivers of people with dementia.
Ruisoto, Pablo;Contador, Israel;Fernández-Calvo, Bernardino;Serra, Lídia;Jenaro, Cristina;Flores, Noelia;Ramos, Francisco;Rivera-Navarro, Jesús;
Vol. 86 , pp. 103952
442 views DOI Abstract
2019
Modifiable factors associated with neuropsychiatric symptoms in nursing homes: The impact of unmet needs and psychotropic drugs.
Ferreira, Ana Rita;Simões, Mário R;Moreira, Emília;Guedes, Joana;Fernandes, Lia;
Vol. 86 , pp. 103919
476 views DOI Abstract
2019
Balance and functional fitness benefits of a Thai boxing dance program among community-dwelling older adults at risk of falling: A randomized controlled study
Areeudomwong, P.
Vol. 83 , pp. 231-238
252 views DOI
Journament Score
41.9/100 · Below Average
Ranked #6,033 of 33,995
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.