Indexed in Journament

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA

ISSN 1433-2965· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
46.9 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #231 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
17 Articles
Scores higher than 99.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Osteoporos Int
Abbreviated Name osteoporos int
ISSN 1433-2965

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 77.8
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 12.1
Content Distribution 80.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 77.8 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 12.1 7.8
Content Distribution 80.6 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (17)

2016
2018
effect of salinity stress on some morpho-physiological traits and quantity and quality of essential oils in peppermint (mentha piperita l.)
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 413-420
425 views DOI Abstract
2019
The association between type 2 diabetes mellitus, hip fracture, and post-hip fracture mortality: a multi-state cohort analysis.
420 views DOI Abstract
2019
Determinants, consequences and potential solutions to poor adherence to anti-osteoporosis treatment: results of an expert group meeting organized by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) and the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF).
382 views DOI Abstract
2020
No longer a historical ailment: two cases of childhood scurvy with recommendations for bone health providers.
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
Secondary prevention of fragility fractures in Asia Pacific: an educational initiative.
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
Rapid suppression of bone formation marker in response to sleep restriction and circadian disruption in men.
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of calcium supplementation on circulating osteocalcin and glycated haemoglobin in older women.
344 views DOI Abstract
2012
گزارش علمی کوتاه: بررسی صفات تعیین کننده عملکرد ذرت شیرین(zea mayes var saccharata) در شرایط آبیاری معمولی و تنش کم آبی با استفاده از روش‌های چند متغیره آماری
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 95-98
343 views DOI Abstract
2020
Long-term cost-effectiveness of screening for fracture risk in a UK primary care setting: the SCOOP study.
Vol. 31 , No. 8 , pp. 1499-1506
279 views DOI Abstract
2020
Algorithm for the management of patients at low, high and very high risk of osteoporotic fractures.
Vol. 31 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
313 views DOI Abstract
2020
No longer a historical ailment: two cases of childhood scurvy with recommendations for bone health providers.
368 views DOI Abstract
2019
Secondary prevention of fragility fractures in Asia Pacific: an educational initiative.
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
How well do the FRAX (Australia) and Garvan calculators predict incident fractures? Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.
291 views DOI Abstract
2019
Determinants, consequences and potential solutions to poor adherence to anti-osteoporosis treatment: results of an expert group meeting organized by the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases (ESCEO) and the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF).
382 views DOI Abstract
2019
Study of twice-weekly injections of Teriparatide by comparing efficacy with once-weekly injections in osteoporosis patients: the TWICE study.
235 views DOI Abstract
2019
Test systems for the biomechanical evaluation of hip protectors: a systematic review.
258 views DOI Abstract
2019
The association between type 2 diabetes mellitus, hip fracture, and post-hip fracture mortality: a multi-state cohort analysis.
420 views DOI Abstract
2019
Rapid suppression of bone formation marker in response to sleep restriction and circadian disruption in men.
354 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
46.9/100 · Below Average
Ranked #231 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

46.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

77.8/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

80.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.