Indexed in Journament

British Journal of Cancer

ISSN 1532-1827· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.9 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #2,323 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
21 Articles
Scores higher than 92% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name British Journal of Cancer
Abbreviated Name br j cancer
ISSN 1532-1827
URL https://www.nature.com/bjc

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for British Journal of Cancer
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 20.0 5.8
Diversity 66.7 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 9.3 5.8
Content Distribution 60.0 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (21)

2020
Does multiparametric imaging with F-FDG-PET/MRI capture spatial variation in immunohistochemical cancer biomarkers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma?
387 views DOI Abstract
2020
Physical activity and breast cancer risk: results from the UK Biobank prospective cohort.
Vol. 122 , No. 5 , pp. 726-732
372 views DOI Abstract
2020
Tumour-derived extracellular vesicles in blood of metastatic cancer patients associate with overall survival.
372 views DOI Abstract
2020
Type 1 IGF receptor associates with adverse outcome and cellular radioresistance in paediatric high-grade glioma.
Vol. 122 , No. 5 , pp. 624-629
342 views DOI Abstract
2009
The opposing roles of Wnt-5a in cancer
Vol. 101 , No. 2 , pp. -
325 views Abstract
2019
Diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer using a combined protein biomarker panel.
306 views DOI Abstract
2011
The health and well-being of cancer survivors in the UK: findings from a population-based survey - British Journal of Cancer
Vol. 105 , No. 1 , pp. S11-S20
292 views DOI Abstract
2011
Recovery and self-management support following primary cancer treatment
Vol. 105 Suppl 1 , No. Suppl 1 , pp. -
287 views Abstract
2009
The opposing roles of Wnt-5a in cancer - British Journal of Cancer
Vol. 101 , No. 2 , pp. 209-214
286 views DOI Abstract
2024
Oesophageal cancer awareness and anticipated time to help-seeking: results from a population-based survey
Vol. 130 , No. 1 , pp. 1795-1802
41 views DOI
2020
Does multiparametric imaging with F-FDG-PET/MRI capture spatial variation in immunohistochemical cancer biomarkers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma?
387 views DOI Abstract
2020
Type 1 IGF receptor associates with adverse outcome and cellular radioresistance in paediatric high-grade glioma.
Vol. 122 , No. 5 , pp. 624-629
342 views DOI Abstract
2020
Physical activity and breast cancer risk: results from the UK Biobank prospective cohort.
Vol. 122 , No. 5 , pp. 726-732
372 views DOI Abstract
2020
Tumour-derived extracellular vesicles in blood of metastatic cancer patients associate with overall survival.
372 views DOI Abstract
2019
Diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer using a combined protein biomarker panel.
306 views DOI Abstract
2011
The health and well-being of cancer survivors in the UK: findings from a population-based survey - British Journal of Cancer
Vol. 105 , No. 1 , pp. S11-S20
292 views DOI Abstract
2011
Recovery and self-management support following primary cancer treatment - British Journal of Cancer
Vol. 105 , No. 1 , pp. S21-S28
224 views DOI Abstract
2011
Implementing a Cancer Fast-track Programme between primary and specialised care in Catalonia (Spain): a mixed methods study - British Journal of Cancer
Vol. 105 , No. 6 , pp. 753-759
108 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
40.9/100 · Below Average
Ranked #2,323 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

40.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

66.7/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

60.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.