Indexed in Journament

British Journal of Cancer

ISSN 1532-1827· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.3/100
Journament Score
#8,462
Journament Rank
21
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name British Journal of Cancer
Abbreviated Name br j cancer
ISSN 1532-1827
URL https://www.nature.com/bjc

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (21)

2020
Does multiparametric imaging with F-FDG-PET/MRI capture spatial variation in immunohistochemical cancer biomarkers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma?
371 views DOI Abstract
2020
Physical activity and breast cancer risk: results from the UK Biobank prospective cohort.
Vol. 122 , No. 5 , pp. 726-732
356 views DOI Abstract
2020
Tumour-derived extracellular vesicles in blood of metastatic cancer patients associate with overall survival.
353 views DOI Abstract
2020
Type 1 IGF receptor associates with adverse outcome and cellular radioresistance in paediatric high-grade glioma.
Vol. 122 , No. 5 , pp. 624-629
328 views DOI Abstract
2009
The opposing roles of Wnt-5a in cancer
Vol. 101 , No. 2 , pp. -
310 views Abstract
2019
Diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer using a combined protein biomarker panel.
293 views DOI Abstract
2011
The health and well-being of cancer survivors in the UK: findings from a population-based survey - British Journal of Cancer
Vol. 105 , No. 1 , pp. S11-S20
273 views DOI Abstract
2011
Recovery and self-management support following primary cancer treatment
Vol. 105 Suppl 1 , No. Suppl 1 , pp. -
270 views Abstract
2009
The opposing roles of Wnt-5a in cancer - British Journal of Cancer
Vol. 101 , No. 2 , pp. 209-214
267 views DOI Abstract
2024
Oesophageal cancer awareness and anticipated time to help-seeking: results from a population-based survey
Vol. 130 , No. 1 , pp. 1795-1802
28 views DOI
2020
Does multiparametric imaging with F-FDG-PET/MRI capture spatial variation in immunohistochemical cancer biomarkers in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma?
371 views DOI Abstract
2020
Type 1 IGF receptor associates with adverse outcome and cellular radioresistance in paediatric high-grade glioma.
Vol. 122 , No. 5 , pp. 624-629
328 views DOI Abstract
2020
Physical activity and breast cancer risk: results from the UK Biobank prospective cohort.
Vol. 122 , No. 5 , pp. 726-732
356 views DOI Abstract
2020
Tumour-derived extracellular vesicles in blood of metastatic cancer patients associate with overall survival.
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
Diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer using a combined protein biomarker panel.
293 views DOI Abstract
2011
The health and well-being of cancer survivors in the UK: findings from a population-based survey - British Journal of Cancer
Vol. 105 , No. 1 , pp. S11-S20
273 views DOI Abstract
2011
Recovery and self-management support following primary cancer treatment - British Journal of Cancer
Vol. 105 , No. 1 , pp. S21-S28
208 views DOI Abstract
2011
Implementing a Cancer Fast-track Programme between primary and specialised care in Catalonia (Spain): a mixed methods study - British Journal of Cancer
Vol. 105 , No. 6 , pp. 753-759
85 views DOI Abstract
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.