remote sensing | Journament

Journal Ranking

#242 / 33,940
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

remote sensing

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name remote sens (basel)
Abbreviated Name remote sensing
ISSN 2072-4292
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (170 total)

2021
Investigating the Relationship between Tree Species Diversity and Landsat-8 Spectral Heterogeneity across Multiple Phenological Stages
Sabelo Madonsela;Moses A. Cho;Abel Ramoelo;Onisimo Mutanga;Madonsela, Sabelo;Cho, Moses A.;Ramoelo, Abel;Mutanga, Onisimo;
Vol. 13 , No. 13 , pp. 2467-
465 views DOI Abstract
2018
Guidelines for Underwater Image Enhancement Based on Benchmarking of Different Methods
Mangeruga, Marino;Bruno, Fabio;Cozza, Marco;Agrafiotis, Panagiotis;Skarlatos, Dimitrios;
Vol. 10 , No. 10 , pp. 1652-
450 views Abstract
2019
Differential Inter-System Biases Estimation and Initial Assessment of Instantaneous Tightly Combined RTK with BDS-3, GPS, and Galileo
Wu, Mingkui;Liu, Wanke;Wang, Wang;Zhang, Xiaohong;
Vol. 11 , No. 12 , pp. 1430-
426 views Abstract
2016
Modeling and mapping agroforestry aboveground biomass in the Brazilian Amazon using airborne lidar data
Chen, Q.
Vol. 8 , pp. 0-0
423 views DOI
2018
A Novel Integrated Approach of Relevance Vector Machine Optimized by Imperialist Competitive Algorithm for Spatial Modeling of Shallow Landslides
Dieu Tien Bui;Himan Shahabi;Ataollah Shirzadi;Kamran Chapi;Nhat-Duc Hoang;Binh Thai Pham;Quang-Thanh Bui;Chuyen-Trung Tran;Mahdi Panahi;Baharin Bin Ahmad;Lee Saro;Tien Bui, Dieu;Shahabi, Himan;Shirzadi, Ataollah;Chapi, Kamran;Hoang, Nhat-Duc;Pham, Binh Thai;Bui, Quang-Thanh;Tran, Chuyen-Trung;Panahi, Mahdi;Bin Ahmad, Baharin;Saro, Lee;
Vol. 10 , No. 10 , pp. 1538-
415 views DOI Abstract
2018
Very Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Complex Land Cover Mapping Using Multispectral Remote Sensing Imagery
Mahdianpari, Masoud;Salehi, Bahram;Rezaee, Mohammad;Mohammadimanesh, Fariba;Zhang, Yun;
Vol. 10 , No. 7 , pp. 1119-
403 views Abstract
2017
Using worldview satellite imagery to map yield in avocado (Persea americana): A case study in Bundaberg, Australia
Robson A.
Vol. 9 , pp. 0-0
394 views DOI
2017
Assessment of Land Use-Cover Changes and Successional Stages of Vegetation in the Natural Protected Area Altas Cumbres, Northeastern Mexico, Using Landsat Satellite Imagery
Sánchez-Reyes, Uriel Jeshua;Niño-Maldonado, Santiago;Barrientos-Lozano, Ludivina;Treviño-Carreón, Jacinto;
Vol. 9 , No. 7 , pp. 712-
391 views Abstract
2018
Prior Season Crop Type Masks for Winter Wheat Yield Forecasting: A US Case Study
Becker-Reshef, Inbal;Franch, Belen;Barker, Brian;Murphy, Emilie;Santamaria-Artigas, Andres;Humber, Michael;Skakun, Sergii;Vermote, Eric;
Vol. 10 , No. 10 , pp. 1659-
385 views Abstract
2019
Unrest at Domuyo Volcano, Argentina, Detected by Geophysical and Geodetic Data and Morphometric Analysis
Astort, Ana;Walter, Thomas R.;Ruiz, Francisco;Sagripanti, Lucía;Nacif, Andrés;Acosta, Gemma;Folguera, Andrés;
Vol. 11 , No. 18 , pp. 2175-
379 views Abstract
View All 170 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.