Indexed in Journament

remote sensing

ISSN 2072-4292· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.8 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #1,005 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
170 Articles
Scores higher than 96.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name remote sens (basel)
Abbreviated Name remote sensing
ISSN 2072-4292
URL http://www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for remote sensing
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.2 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 80.1 26.3
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 7.1 4.3
Content Distribution 77.8 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (170)

2021
Investigating the Relationship between Tree Species Diversity and Landsat-8 Spectral Heterogeneity across Multiple Phenological Stages
Vol. 13 , No. 13 , pp. 2467-
541 views DOI Abstract
2018
Guidelines for Underwater Image Enhancement Based on Benchmarking of Different Methods
Vol. 10 , No. 10 , pp. 1652-
511 views Abstract
2019
Differential Inter-System Biases Estimation and Initial Assessment of Instantaneous Tightly Combined RTK with BDS-3, GPS, and Galileo
Vol. 11 , No. 12 , pp. 1430-
500 views Abstract
2018
A Novel Integrated Approach of Relevance Vector Machine Optimized by Imperialist Competitive Algorithm for Spatial Modeling of Shallow Landslides
Vol. 10 , No. 10 , pp. 1538-
477 views DOI Abstract
2018
Very Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Complex Land Cover Mapping Using Multispectral Remote Sensing Imagery
Vol. 10 , No. 7 , pp. 1119-
456 views Abstract
2017
Assessment of Land Use-Cover Changes and Successional Stages of Vegetation in the Natural Protected Area Altas Cumbres, Northeastern Mexico, Using Landsat Satellite Imagery
Vol. 9 , No. 7 , pp. 712-
443 views Abstract
2018
Prior Season Crop Type Masks for Winter Wheat Yield Forecasting: A US Case Study
Vol. 10 , No. 10 , pp. 1659-
442 views Abstract
2019
Unrest at Domuyo Volcano, Argentina, Detected by Geophysical and Geodetic Data and Morphometric Analysis
Vol. 11 , No. 18 , pp. 2175-
434 views Abstract
2021
Reconstruction of Complex Roof Semantic Structures from 3D Point Clouds Using Local Convexity and Consistency
Vol. 13 , No. 10 , pp. 1946-
214 views DOI Abstract
2021
2021
Investigating the Relationship between Tree Species Diversity and Landsat-8 Spectral Heterogeneity across Multiple Phenological Stages
Vol. 13 , No. 13 , pp. 2467-
541 views DOI Abstract
2021
Accuracy Assessment in Convolutional Neural Network-Based Deep Learning Remote Sensing Studies—Part 1: Literature Review
Vol. 13 , No. 13 , pp. 2450-
325 views DOI Abstract
2021
Arctic-Boreal Lake Phenology Shows a Relationship between Earlier Lake Ice-Out and Later Green-Up
Vol. 13 , No. 13 , pp. 2533-
314 views DOI Abstract
2021
Multi-Scale Spatiotemporal Change Characteristics Analysis of High-Frequency Disturbance Forest Ecosystem Based on Improved Spatiotemporal Cube Model
Vol. 13 , No. 13 , pp. 2537-
186 views DOI Abstract
2021
Multi-Scale Fused SAR Image Registration Based on Deep Forest
Vol. 13 , No. 11 , pp. 2227-
249 views DOI Abstract
2021
Creating a Field-Wide Forage Canopy Model Using UAVs and Photogrammetry Processing
Vol. 13 , No. 13 , pp. 2487-
280 views DOI Abstract
2021
Comparison and Evaluation of Different Pit-Filling Methods for Generating High Resolution Canopy Height Model Using UAV Laser Scanning Data
Vol. 13 , No. 12 , pp. 2239-
232 views DOI Abstract
2021
Self-Attention in Reconstruction Bias U-Net for Semantic Segmentation of Building Rooftops in Optical Remote Sensing Images
Vol. 13 , No. 13 , pp. 2524-
252 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
42.8/100 · Below Average
Ranked #1,005 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

42.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

80.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

77.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.