Indexed in Journament

remote sensing

ISSN 2072-4292· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,606 of 29,312 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
170 Articles
Scores higher than 87.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name remote sens (basel)
Abbreviated Name remote sensing
ISSN 2072-4292
URL http://www.mdpi.com/journal/remotesensing

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 55.6 25.9
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 6.4 7.8
Content Distribution 77.2 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (170)

2021
Investigating the Relationship between Tree Species Diversity and Landsat-8 Spectral Heterogeneity across Multiple Phenological Stages
Sabelo Madonsela;Moses A. Cho;Abel Ramoelo;Onisimo Mutanga;Madonsela, Sabelo;Cho, Moses A.;Ramoelo, Abel;Mutanga, Onisimo;
Vol. 13 , No. 13 , pp. 2467-
521 views DOI Abstract
2018
Guidelines for Underwater Image Enhancement Based on Benchmarking of Different Methods
Mangeruga, Marino;Bruno, Fabio;Cozza, Marco;Agrafiotis, Panagiotis;Skarlatos, Dimitrios;
Vol. 10 , No. 10 , pp. 1652-
499 views Abstract
2019
Differential Inter-System Biases Estimation and Initial Assessment of Instantaneous Tightly Combined RTK with BDS-3, GPS, and Galileo
Wu, Mingkui;Liu, Wanke;Wang, Wang;Zhang, Xiaohong;
Vol. 11 , No. 12 , pp. 1430-
477 views Abstract
2018
A Novel Integrated Approach of Relevance Vector Machine Optimized by Imperialist Competitive Algorithm for Spatial Modeling of Shallow Landslides
Dieu Tien Bui;Himan Shahabi;Ataollah Shirzadi;Kamran Chapi;Nhat-Duc Hoang;Binh Thai Pham;Quang-Thanh Bui;Chuyen-Trung Tran;Mahdi Panahi;Baharin Bin Ahmad;Lee Saro;Tien Bui, Dieu;Shahabi, Himan;Shirzadi, Ataollah;Chapi, Kamran;Hoang, Nhat-Duc;Pham, Binh Thai;Bui, Quang-Thanh;Tran, Chuyen-Trung;Panahi, Mahdi;Bin Ahmad, Baharin;Saro, Lee;
Vol. 10 , No. 10 , pp. 1538-
460 views DOI Abstract
2016
Modeling and mapping agroforestry aboveground biomass in the Brazilian Amazon using airborne lidar data
Chen, Q.
Vol. 8 , pp. 0-0
455 views DOI
2018
Very Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Complex Land Cover Mapping Using Multispectral Remote Sensing Imagery
Mahdianpari, Masoud;Salehi, Bahram;Rezaee, Mohammad;Mohammadimanesh, Fariba;Zhang, Yun;
Vol. 10 , No. 7 , pp. 1119-
442 views Abstract
2017
Using worldview satellite imagery to map yield in avocado (Persea americana): A case study in Bundaberg, Australia
Robson A.
Vol. 9 , pp. 0-0
438 views DOI
2017
Assessment of Land Use-Cover Changes and Successional Stages of Vegetation in the Natural Protected Area Altas Cumbres, Northeastern Mexico, Using Landsat Satellite Imagery
Sánchez-Reyes, Uriel Jeshua;Niño-Maldonado, Santiago;Barrientos-Lozano, Ludivina;Treviño-Carreón, Jacinto;
Vol. 9 , No. 7 , pp. 712-
433 views Abstract
2018
Prior Season Crop Type Masks for Winter Wheat Yield Forecasting: A US Case Study
Becker-Reshef, Inbal;Franch, Belen;Barker, Brian;Murphy, Emilie;Santamaria-Artigas, Andres;Humber, Michael;Skakun, Sergii;Vermote, Eric;
Vol. 10 , No. 10 , pp. 1659-
431 views Abstract
2019
Unrest at Domuyo Volcano, Argentina, Detected by Geophysical and Geodetic Data and Morphometric Analysis
Astort, Ana;Walter, Thomas R.;Ruiz, Francisco;Sagripanti, Lucía;Nacif, Andrés;Acosta, Gemma;Folguera, Andrés;
Vol. 11 , No. 18 , pp. 2175-
424 views Abstract
2021
Reconstruction of Complex Roof Semantic Structures from 3D Point Clouds Using Local Convexity and Consistency
Pingbo Hu;Yiming Miao;Miaole Hou;Hu, Pingbo;Miao, Yiming;Hou, Miaole;
Vol. 13 , No. 10 , pp. 1946-
196 views DOI Abstract
2021
Estimation of hail damage using crop models and remote sensing
Gobbo, S.
Vol. 13 , pp. 0-0
46 views DOI
2021
Investigating the Relationship between Tree Species Diversity and Landsat-8 Spectral Heterogeneity across Multiple Phenological Stages
Sabelo Madonsela;Moses A. Cho;Abel Ramoelo;Onisimo Mutanga;Madonsela, Sabelo;Cho, Moses A.;Ramoelo, Abel;Mutanga, Onisimo;
Vol. 13 , No. 13 , pp. 2467-
521 views DOI Abstract
2021
Accuracy Assessment in Convolutional Neural Network-Based Deep Learning Remote Sensing Studies—Part 1: Literature Review
Aaron E. Maxwell;Timothy A. Warner;Luis Andrés Guillén;Maxwell, Aaron E.;Warner, Timothy A.;Guillén, Luis Andrés;
Vol. 13 , No. 13 , pp. 2450-
307 views DOI Abstract
2021
Arctic-Boreal Lake Phenology Shows a Relationship between Earlier Lake Ice-Out and Later Green-Up
Catherine Kuhn;Aji John;Janneke Hille Ris Lambers;David Butman;Amanda Tan;Kuhn, Catherine;John, Aji;Hille Ris Lambers, Janneke;Butman, David;Tan, Amanda;
Vol. 13 , No. 13 , pp. 2533-
293 views DOI Abstract
2021
Multi-Scale Spatiotemporal Change Characteristics Analysis of High-Frequency Disturbance Forest Ecosystem Based on Improved Spatiotemporal Cube Model
Yangcen Zhang;Xiangnan Liu;Meiling Liu;Xinyu Zou;Qian Zhang;Tao Peng;Zhang, Yangcen;Liu, Xiangnan;Liu, Meiling;Zou, Xinyu;Zhang, Qian;Peng, Tao;
Vol. 13 , No. 13 , pp. 2537-
175 views DOI Abstract
2021
Multi-Scale Fused SAR Image Registration Based on Deep Forest
Shasha Mao;Jinyuan Yang;Shuiping Gou;Licheng Jiao;Tao Xiong;Lin Xiong;Mao, Shasha;Yang, Jinyuan;Gou, Shuiping;Jiao, Licheng;Xiong, Tao;Xiong, Lin;
Vol. 13 , No. 11 , pp. 2227-
221 views DOI Abstract
2021
Creating a Field-Wide Forage Canopy Model Using UAVs and Photogrammetry Processing
Cameron Minch;Joseph Dvorak;Josh Jackson;Stuart Tucker Sheffield;Minch, Cameron;Dvorak, Joseph;Jackson, Josh;Sheffield, Stuart Tucker;
Vol. 13 , No. 13 , pp. 2487-
257 views DOI Abstract
2021
Comparison and Evaluation of Different Pit-Filling Methods for Generating High Resolution Canopy Height Model Using UAV Laser Scanning Data
Ying Quan;Mingze Li;Yuanshuo Hao;Bin Wang;Quan, Ying;Li, Mingze;Hao, Yuanshuo;Wang, Bin;
Vol. 13 , No. 12 , pp. 2239-
209 views DOI Abstract
2021
Self-Attention in Reconstruction Bias U-Net for Semantic Segmentation of Building Rooftops in Optical Remote Sensing Images
Ziyi Chen;Dilong Li;Wentao Fan;Haiyan Guan;Cheng Wang;Jonathan Li;Chen, Ziyi;Li, Dilong;Fan, Wentao;Guan, Haiyan;Wang, Cheng;Li, Jonathan;
Vol. 13 , No. 13 , pp. 2524-
234 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,606 of 29,312 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

6.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

77.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.