Indexed in Journament

ingenierías usbmed

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,820 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
32 Articles
Scores higher than 49.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name ingenierías usbmed
Abbreviated Name ingenierías usbmed

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 9.3
Content Distribution 62.1
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.1
Accessibility — 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity — 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 9.3 13.4
Content Distribution 62.1 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (32)

2016
focus on you: cancer clinical trials perspectives
;Brandi N. Robinson;Antoinette F. Newman;Sherrie F. Wallington;Sandra M. Swain
Vol. 4 , No. C , pp. 170-178
587 views DOI Abstract
2018
the “interval walking in colorectal cancer” (i-walk-crc) study: design, methods and recruitment results of a randomized controlled feasibility trial
;Anna Banck-Petersen;Cecilie K. Olsen;Sissal S. Djurhuus;Anita Herrstedt;Sarah Thorsen-Streit;Mathias Ried-Larsen;Kell Østerlind;Jens Osterkamp;Peter-Martin Krarup;Kirsten Vistisen;Camilla S. Mosgaard;Bente K. Pedersen;Pernille Højman;Jesper F. Christensen
Vol. 9 , No. C , pp. 143-150
583 views DOI Abstract
2017
potential role of a pharmacist to enhance medication-related aspects of clinical trials conducted in a dedicated clinical research unit
;Kimberly A. Redic, PharmD;Amy Skyles, PharmD;John Zaccardelli, PharmD
Vol. 6 , No. C , pp. 55-57
577 views DOI Abstract
2017
comparative effectiveness of pediatric integrative medicine as an adjunct to usual care for pediatric inpatients of a north american tertiary care centre: a study protocol for a pragmatic cluster controlled trial
;Sunita Vohra;Michael Schlegelmilch;Hsing Jou;Dawn Hartfield;Maria Mayan;Arto Ohinmaa;Bev Wilson;Maria Spavor;Paul Grundy
Vol. 5 , No. C , pp. 12-18
447 views DOI Abstract
2016
design of a lifestyle intervention to slow menopause-related progression of intra-abdominal adipose tissue in women: the women in the southside health and fitness (wishfit) study
;Sheila A. Dugan;Brittney Lange-Maia;Kelly Karavolos;Rasa Kazlauskaite;Chiquia S. Hollings;Elizabeth Avery;Lisa Nackers;Elizabeth Lynch;Jennifer Ventrelle;Patricia Normand;Tricia Johnson;Francis Fullam;Karla Shipp-Johnson;JoEllen Wilbur;Lynda H. Powell
Vol. 4 , No. C , pp. 74-83
433 views DOI Abstract
2016
self-reported physician practices in pulmonary arterial hypertension: diagnosis, assessment, and referral
;Susan Polanco-Briceno;Daniel Glass;Alexis Caze
Vol. 2 , No. C , pp. 54-60
391 views DOI Abstract
2017
age-related macular degeneration in a randomized controlled trial of low-dose aspirin: rationale and study design of the aspree-amd study
;Liubov Robman;Robyn Guymer;Robyn Woods;Stephanie Ward;Rory Wolfe;James Phung;Lauren Hodgson;Galina Makeyeva;Khin Zaw Aung;Tom Gilbert;Jessica Lockery;Y-Anh Le-Pham;Suzanne Orchard;Elsdon Storey;Walter Abhayaratna;Daniel Reid;Michael E. Ernst;Mark Nelson;Christopher Reid;John McNeil
Vol. 6 , No. C , pp. 105-114
385 views DOI Abstract
2017
a cross-cutting approach to enhancing clinical trial site success: the department of veterans affairs' network of dedicated enrollment sites (nodes) model
;Debra L. Condon, MSN, RN, CCRP;Danielle Beck, MPH, CCRC;Tawni Kenworthy-Heinige, BS, EMT-I, CPT, CCRP;Karen Bratcher, MSN, RN, CNL, CCRC;Meghan O'Leary, MA;Aliya Asghar, MPH, CCRC;Cyenthia Willis, RN, BSN, CCRP;Marcus R. Johnson, MPH, MBA, MHA;Grant D. Huang, MPH, PhD
Vol. 6 , No. C , pp. 78-84
382 views DOI Abstract
2016
trial participant representativeness compared to ordinary service users in a work rehabilitation setting
;Simon Øverland;Astrid Grasdal;Silje Endresen Reme
Vol. 2 , No. C , pp. 12-15
382 views DOI Abstract
2017
design of phase ii non-inferiority trials
;Sin-Ho Jung
Vol. 7 , pp. 23-27
368 views Abstract
2020
clinical evaluation of emblica officinalis gatertn (amla) in healthy human subjects: health benefits and safety results from a randomized, double-blind, crossover placebo-controlled study
;Mahendra Parkash Kapoor;Koji Suzuki;Timm Derek;Makoto Ozeki;Tsutomu Okubo
Vol. 17 , pp. -
258 views Abstract
2018
the “interval walking in colorectal cancer” (i-walk-crc) study: design, methods and recruitment results of a randomized controlled feasibility trial
;Anna Banck-Petersen;Cecilie K. Olsen;Sissal S. Djurhuus;Anita Herrstedt;Sarah Thorsen-Streit;Mathias Ried-Larsen;Kell Østerlind;Jens Osterkamp;Peter-Martin Krarup;Kirsten Vistisen;Camilla S. Mosgaard;Bente K. Pedersen;Pernille Højman;Jesper F. Christensen
Vol. 9 , No. C , pp. 143-150
583 views DOI Abstract
2018
patient profiling for success after weight loss surgery (go bypass study): an interdisciplinary study protocol
;Bodil Just Christensen;Julie Berg Schmidt;Mette Søndergaard Nielsen;Louise Tækker;Lotte Holm;Susanne Lunn;Wender L.P. Bredie;Christian Ritz;Jens Juul Holst;Torben Hansen;Anja Hilbert;Carel W. le Roux;Oliver J. Hulme;Hartwig Siebner;Tobias Morville;Lars Naver;Andrea Karen Floyd;Anders Sjödin
Vol. 10 , pp. 121-130
171 views Abstract
2017
parenting program versus telephone support for mexican parents of children with acquired brain injury: a blind randomized controlled trial
;Clara Chávez;Cathy Catroppa;Stephen J.C. Hearps;Guillermina Yáñez-Téllez;Belén Prieto-Corona;Miguel A. de León;Antonio García;Lucero Sandoval-Lira;Vicki Anderson
Vol. 7 , pp. 109-115
150 views Abstract
2017
a randomized efficacy trial of a cognitive-behavioral group intervention to prevent internet use disorder onset in adolescents: the protect study protocol
;Katajun Lindenberg;Katharina Halasy;Sophie Schoenmaekers
Vol. 6 , No. C , pp. 64-71
186 views DOI Abstract
2017
statistical analysis plan for stage 1 embarc (establishing moderators and biosignatures of antidepressant response for clinical care) study
;Eva Petkova;R. Todd Ogden;Thaddeus Tarpey;Adam Ciarleglio;Bei Jiang;Zhe Su;Thomas Carmody;Philip Adams;Helena C. Kraemer;Bruce D. Grannemann;Maria A. Oquendo;Ramin Parsey;Myrna Weissman;Patrick J. McGrath;Maurizio Fava;Madhukar H. Trivedi
Vol. 6 , No. C , pp. 22-30
231 views DOI Abstract
2017
estimation of treatment effects in weighted log-rank tests
;Ray S. Lin;Larry F. León
Vol. 8 , No. C , pp. 147-155
110 views DOI Abstract
2017
design of phase ii non-inferiority trials
;Sin-Ho Jung
Vol. 7 , pp. 23-27
368 views Abstract
2017
potential role of a pharmacist to enhance medication-related aspects of clinical trials conducted in a dedicated clinical research unit
;Kimberly A. Redic, PharmD;Amy Skyles, PharmD;John Zaccardelli, PharmD
Vol. 6 , No. C , pp. 55-57
577 views DOI Abstract
2017
study protocol for the fitr heart study: feasibility, safety, adherence, and efficacy of high intensity interval training in a hospital-initiated rehabilitation program for coronary heart disease
;Jenna Taylor;Shelley E. Keating, PhD;Michael D. Leveritt, PhD;David J. Holland, MBBS, PhD;Sjaan R. Gomersall, PhD;Jeff S. Coombes, PhD
Vol. 8 , No. C , pp. 181-191
332 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
35.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,820 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

62.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.