Indexed in Journament

healthcare informatics research

ISSN 2093-3681· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,097 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
24 Articles
Scores higher than 82.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name healthc inform res
Abbreviated Name healthc inform res
ISSN 2093-3681
URL http://www.e-hir.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 50.0 24.4
Innovation 63.0 25.7
Community Impact 7.9 5.8
Content Distribution 75.5 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (24)

2016
fuzzy logic-decision-making system dedicated to evaluation of logistics project effectiveness
;Iwona Pisz;Iwona Łapuńka
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. -
560 views Abstract
2016
how to manage sustainable supply chain? the issue of maturity
;Agata Rudnicka
Vol. 12 , No. 4 , pp. -
462 views Abstract
2019
Prediction and Staging of Hepatic Fibrosis in Children with Hepatitis C Virus: A Machine Learning Approach.
Barakat, Nahla H;Barakat, Sana H;Ahmed, Nadia;
Vol. 25 , No. 3 , pp. 173-181
419 views DOI Abstract
2012
supply chains in context of knowledge of business networks
;Marek Ciesielski
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. -
411 views Abstract
2014
organization of washing and disinfection during the production process in meat industry
;Agnieszka Bilska
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. -
406 views Abstract
2019
Integrating Genetic Data into Electronic Health Records: Medical Geneticists' Perspectives.
Ayatollahi, Haleh;Hosseini, Seyedeh Fatemeh;Hemmat, Morteza;
Vol. 25 , No. 4 , pp. 289-296
386 views DOI Abstract
2020
Association between Full Electronic Medical Record System Adoption and Drug Use: Antibiotics and Polypharmacy.
Park, Young-Taek;Kim, Donghwan;Park, Rae Woong;Atalag, Koray;Kwon, In Ho;Yoon, Dukyong;Choi, Mona;
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 68-77
380 views DOI Abstract
2019
Augmentation of Doppler Radar Data Using Generative Adversarial Network for Human Motion Analysis.
Alnujaim, Ibrahim;Kim, Youngwook;
Vol. 25 , No. 4 , pp. 344-349
378 views DOI Abstract
2011
supplier performance monitoring and improvement (spmi) through sipoc analysis and pdca model to the iso 9001 qms in sports goods manufacturing industry
;
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. -
356 views Abstract
2019
Clinical Decision Support Functions and Digitalization of Clinical Documents of Electronic Medical Record Systems.
Park, Young-Taek;Kim, Yeon Sook;Yi, Byoung-Kee;Kim, Sang Mi;
Vol. 25 , No. 2 , pp. 115-123
354 views DOI Abstract
2020
Association between Full Electronic Medical Record System Adoption and Drug Use: Antibiotics and Polypharmacy.
Park, Young-Taek;Kim, Donghwan;Park, Rae Woong;Atalag, Koray;Kwon, In Ho;Yoon, Dukyong;Choi, Mona;
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 68-77
380 views DOI Abstract
2019
Integrating Genetic Data into Electronic Health Records: Medical Geneticists' Perspectives.
Ayatollahi, Haleh;Hosseini, Seyedeh Fatemeh;Hemmat, Morteza;
Vol. 25 , No. 4 , pp. 289-296
386 views DOI Abstract
2019
Augmentation of Doppler Radar Data Using Generative Adversarial Network for Human Motion Analysis.
Alnujaim, Ibrahim;Kim, Youngwook;
Vol. 25 , No. 4 , pp. 344-349
378 views DOI Abstract
2019
Clinical Decision Support Functions and Digitalization of Clinical Documents of Electronic Medical Record Systems.
Park, Young-Taek;Kim, Yeon Sook;Yi, Byoung-Kee;Kim, Sang Mi;
Vol. 25 , No. 2 , pp. 115-123
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
Analyzing and visualizing knowledge structures of health informatics from 1974 to 2018: A bibliometric and social network analysis
Saheb, T.
Vol. 25 , pp. 61-72
340 views DOI
2019
Health Referral Enterprise Architecture Design in Indonesia.
Handayani, Putu Wuri;Pinem, Ave Adriana;Munajat, Qorib;Azzahro, Fatimah;Hidayanto, Achmad Nizar;Ayuningtyas, Dumilah;Sartono, Arief;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 3-11
193 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nature of Complex Network of Dengue Epidemic as a Scale-Free Network.
Malik, Hafiz Abid Mahmood;Abid, Faiza;Mahmood, Nadeem;Wahiddin, Mohamed Ridza;Malik, Asif;
Vol. 25 , No. 3 , pp. 182-192
233 views DOI Abstract
2019
Prediction and Staging of Hepatic Fibrosis in Children with Hepatitis C Virus: A Machine Learning Approach.
Barakat, Nahla H;Barakat, Sana H;Ahmed, Nadia;
Vol. 25 , No. 3 , pp. 173-181
419 views DOI Abstract
2018
How to sustain smart connected hospital services: An experience from a pilot project on IoT-based healthcare services
Park, A.
Vol. 24 , pp. 387-393
229 views DOI
2017
the impact of coi-based storage on order-picking times
;Grzegorz Tarczyński
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. -
194 views Abstract
Journament Score
36.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,097 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

50.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

63.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

75.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.