arthritis care & research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#572 / 33,950
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
38
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

arthritis care & research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name arthritis care res (hoboken)
Abbreviated Name arthritis care res (hoboken)
ISSN 2151-4658
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/21514658
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (23 total)

2019
First Validation of the Full PROMIS Pain Interference and Pain Behavior Item Banks in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.
Crins, Martine H P;Terwee, Caroline B;Westhovens, Rene;van Schaardenburg, Dirkjan;Smits, N;Joly, Johan;Verschueren, Patrick;Van der Elst, Kristien;Dekker, Joost;Boers, Maarten;Roorda, Leo D;
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
"I don't have to think about watching the ground": a qualitative study exploring the concept of vigilance as an important outcome for ankle reconstruction.
Pinsker, Ellie B;Sale, Joanna E M;Gignac, Monique A M;Daniels, Timothy R;Beaton, Dorcas E;
362 views DOI Abstract
2014
Impact of psychological factors on subjective disease activity assessments in patients with severe rheumatoid arthritis.
Cordingley, Lis;Prajapati, Rita;Plant, Darren;Maskell, Deborah;Morgan, Catharine;Ali, Faisal R;Morgan, Ann W;Wilson, Anthony G;Isaacs, John D;, ;Barton, Anne;
Vol. 66 , No. 6 , pp. 861-8
346 views DOI Abstract
2019
Associations among classification criteria items within systemic lupus erythematosus.
Touma, Zahi;Cervera, Ricard;Brinks, Ralph;Lorenzoni, Valentina;Tani, Chiara;Hoyer, Bimba F;Costenbader, Karen H;Sebastian, Gian Domenico;Navarra, Sandra V;Bonfa, Eloisa;Ramsey-Goldman, Rosalind;Tedeschi, Sara K;Dörner, Thomas;Johnson, Sindhu R;Aringer, Martin;Mosca, Marta;, ;
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Multi-Centre Qualitative Study Exploring the Patient Experience of Digital Ulcers in Systemic Sclerosis.
Hughes, Michael;Pauling, John D;Jones, Jennifer;Denton, Christopher P;Domsic, Robyn T;Frech, Tracy M;Herrick, Ariane L;Khanna, Dinesh;Matucci-Cerinic, Marco;McKenzie, Lorraine;Saketkoo, Lesley Ann;Gooberman-Hill, Rachael;Moore, Andrew;
320 views DOI Abstract
2020
Reply to The Letter to the Editors (ACR-19-1134) Opioid Use in Patients with Acute Gout.
Dalal, Deepan S;Mbuyi, Nadine;Reginato, Anthony;
310 views DOI Abstract
2020
Do patients with rheumatic diseases living in rural settings have poorer outcomes? Results from a systematic review of the literature.
Hollick, Rosemary J;Macfarlane, Gary J;
305 views DOI Abstract
2019
Clinical Presentation, Management and Long Term Outcome of Pars Planitis (PP), Panuveitis (PU) and Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada disease (VKH) in Children and Adolescents.
Reiff, Andreas;
299 views DOI Abstract
2020
Reply to: Did antiphospholipid antibodies limit intervention efficacy for postoperative total knee arthroplasty-related thrombotic event prevention?
Smith, Savannah R;Katz, Jeffrey N;Losina, Elena;
280 views DOI Abstract
2016
Diagnostic Criteria as Separate From Classification Criteria: A Perpetual Motion Machine? Comment on the Article by Aggarwal et al.
Yazici, Hasan;Hatemi, Gulen;Yazici, Yusuf;
Vol. 68 , No. 7 , pp. 1049
270 views DOI
View All 23 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
38
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

38.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.