Indexed in Journament

journal of industrial and engineering chemistry

ISSN 1226-086X· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,820 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
42 Articles
Scores higher than 12% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal of industrial and engineering chemistry
Abbreviated Name journal of industrial and engineering chemistry
ISSN 1226-086X
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-industrial-and-engineering-chemistry

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 5.0 13.4
Content Distribution 65.7 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (42)

2019
Rare earth metal functionalized electrospun nanofiber catalyst for effective photo-decontamination of profenofos toxin
Lakshmi, K.
Vol. 80 , pp. 182-189
371 views DOI
2017
the impact of socioeconomic status and multimorbidity on mortality: a population-based cohort study
;Lund Jensen N;Pedersen HS;Vestergaard M;Mercer SW;Glümer C;Prior A
Vol. Volume 9 , pp. 279-289
359 views Abstract
2019
Greener processes in the preparation of thin film nanocomposite membranes with diverse metal-organic frameworks for organic solvent nanofiltration
Paseta, L.
Vol. 77 , pp. 344-354
355 views DOI
2016
the danish lung cancer registry
;Jakobsen E;Rasmussen TR
Vol. Volume 8 , pp. 537-541
348 views Abstract
2017
prevalence of hypercalcemia of malignancy among pediatric cancer patients in the uk clinical practice research datalink database
;Jick S;Li L;Gastanaga VM;Liede A;Hernandez RK
Vol. Volume 9 , pp. 339-343
324 views Abstract
2019
Plasmonic and charging effects in dye-sensitized solar cells with Au nanoparticles incorporated into the channels of freestanding TiO<inf>2</inf> nanotube arrays by an electrodeposition method
Yang, H.
Vol. 80 , pp. 311-317
315 views DOI
2016
development of an algorithm to identify urgent referrals for suspected cancer from the danish primary care referral database
;Toftegaard BS;Guldbrandt LM;Flarup KR;Beyer H;Bro F;Vedsted P
Vol. Volume 8 , pp. 751-759
308 views Abstract
2017
liver-related morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic hepatitis c and cirrhosis with and without sustained virologic response
;Hallager S;Ladelund S;Christensen PB;Kjær M;Thorup Roege B;Grønbæk KE;Belard E;Barfod TS;Madsen LG;Gerstoft J;Tarp B;Krarup HB;Weis N
Vol. Volume 9 , pp. 501-516
307 views Abstract
2018
pheochromocytoma in denmark during 1977&ndash;2016: validating diagnosis codes and creating a national cohort using patterns of health registrations
;Ebbehoj A;Jacobsen SF;Trolle C;Robaczyk MG;Rasmussen ÅK;Feldt-Rasmussen U;Thomsen RW;Poulsen PL;Stochholm K;Søndergaard E
Vol. Volume 10 , pp. 683-695
302 views Abstract
2016
the danish inguinal hernia database
;Friis-Andersen H;Bisgaard T
Vol. Volume 8 , pp. 521-524
298 views Abstract
2022
Solid–Solution–Solid (SSS) phase transitions for Gram-Scale and High-Throughput synthesis of noble metal nanoparticles in deep eutectic solvents
Kim, Y.H.
Vol. 112 , pp. 182-192
138 views DOI
2020
Experimental complemented with microscopic (electronic/atomic)-level modeling explorations of Laurus nobilis extract as green inhibitor for carbon steel in acidic solution
Dehghani, A.
Vol. 84 , pp. 52-71
152 views DOI
2020
Nanoporous composites of activated carbon-metal organic frameworks for organic dye adsorption: Synthesis, adsorption mechanism and kinetics studies
Hasanzadeh, M.
Vol. 81 , pp. 405-414
200 views DOI
2020
Different 2D materials based polyetherimide mixed matrix membranes for CO<inf>2</inf>/N<inf>2</inf> separation
Kamble, A.
Vol. 81 , pp. 451-463
213 views DOI
2019
Rare earth metal functionalized electrospun nanofiber catalyst for effective photo-decontamination of profenofos toxin
Lakshmi, K.
Vol. 80 , pp. 182-189
371 views DOI
2019
Greener processes in the preparation of thin film nanocomposite membranes with diverse metal-organic frameworks for organic solvent nanofiltration
Paseta, L.
Vol. 77 , pp. 344-354
355 views DOI
2019
Plasmonic and charging effects in dye-sensitized solar cells with Au nanoparticles incorporated into the channels of freestanding TiO<inf>2</inf> nanotube arrays by an electrodeposition method
Yang, H.
Vol. 80 , pp. 311-317
315 views DOI
2019
Review on simulation of current–voltage characteristics of dye-sensitized solar cells
Rudra, S.
Vol. 80 , pp. 516-526
208 views DOI
2019
Transparent 3 nm-thick MoS<inf>2</inf> counter electrodes for bifacial dye-sensitized solar cells
Jeong, T.
Vol. 80 , pp. 106-111
240 views DOI
2019
Urtica dioica extract as a facile green reductant of graphene oxide for UV resistant and corrosion protective polyurethane coating fabrication
Mahmudzadeh, M.
Vol. 78 , pp. 125-136
218 views DOI
Journament Score
28.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,820 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

28.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

65.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.