journal of industrial and engineering chemistry | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1626 / 33,968
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

journal of industrial and engineering chemistry

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ulakbim sci
Short Name journal of industrial and engineering chemistry
Abbreviated Name journal of industrial and engineering chemistry
ISSN 1226-086X
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-industrial-and-engineering-chemistry
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (42 total)

2019
Rare earth metal functionalized electrospun nanofiber catalyst for effective photo-decontamination of profenofos toxin
Lakshmi, K.
Vol. 80 , pp. 182-189
320 views DOI
2017
the impact of socioeconomic status and multimorbidity on mortality: a population-based cohort study
;Lund Jensen N;Pedersen HS;Vestergaard M;Mercer SW;Glümer C;Prior A
Vol. Volume 9 , pp. 279-289
309 views Abstract
2019
Greener processes in the preparation of thin film nanocomposite membranes with diverse metal-organic frameworks for organic solvent nanofiltration
Paseta, L.
Vol. 77 , pp. 344-354
303 views DOI
2016
the danish lung cancer registry
;Jakobsen E;Rasmussen TR
Vol. Volume 8 , pp. 537-541
294 views Abstract
2019
Plasmonic and charging effects in dye-sensitized solar cells with Au nanoparticles incorporated into the channels of freestanding TiO<inf>2</inf> nanotube arrays by an electrodeposition method
Yang, H.
Vol. 80 , pp. 311-317
276 views DOI
2017
liver-related morbidity and mortality in patients with chronic hepatitis c and cirrhosis with and without sustained virologic response
;Hallager S;Ladelund S;Christensen PB;Kjær M;Thorup Roege B;Grønbæk KE;Belard E;Barfod TS;Madsen LG;Gerstoft J;Tarp B;Krarup HB;Weis N
Vol. Volume 9 , pp. 501-516
272 views Abstract
2017
prevalence of hypercalcemia of malignancy among pediatric cancer patients in the uk clinical practice research datalink database
;Jick S;Li L;Gastanaga VM;Liede A;Hernandez RK
Vol. Volume 9 , pp. 339-343
266 views Abstract
2016
development of an algorithm to identify urgent referrals for suspected cancer from the danish primary care referral database
;Toftegaard BS;Guldbrandt LM;Flarup KR;Beyer H;Bro F;Vedsted P
Vol. Volume 8 , pp. 751-759
264 views Abstract
2016
the danish inguinal hernia database
;Friis-Andersen H;Bisgaard T
Vol. Volume 8 , pp. 521-524
261 views Abstract
2018
pheochromocytoma in denmark during 1977&ndash;2016: validating diagnosis codes and creating a national cohort using patterns of health registrations
;Ebbehoj A;Jacobsen SF;Trolle C;Robaczyk MG;Rasmussen ÅK;Feldt-Rasmussen U;Thomsen RW;Poulsen PL;Stochholm K;Søndergaard E
Vol. Volume 10 , pp. 683-695
246 views Abstract
View All 42 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.