applied nanoscience | Journament

Journal Ranking

#922 / 33,953
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

applied nanoscience

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim
Short Name appl nanosci
Abbreviated Name appl nanosci
ISSN 2190-5509
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/13204
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (37 total)

2019
Lightweight magnesium nanocomposites: electrical conductivity of liquid magnesium doped by CoPd nanoparticles.
Yakymovych, Andriy;Slabon, Adam;Plevachuk, Yuriy;Sklyarchuk, Vasyl;Sokoliuk, Bohdan;
Vol. 9 , No. 5 , pp. 1119-1125
344 views DOI Abstract
2010
biologia reprodutiva e uso de habitat por cantorchilus leucotis (lafresnaye, 1845) (aves, troglodytidae) no pantanal, mato grosso, brasil
;Paula Fernanda Albonette de Nóbrega;João Batista de Pinho
Vol. 50 , No. 31 , pp. 511-516
287 views DOI Abstract
2012
seasonal fluctuation in the population of harmonia axyridis (pallas, 1773) (coleoptera: coccinellidae) and co-occurrence with other coccinellids in the federal district of brazil
;Érica Sevilha Harterreiten-Souza;Pedro Henrique Brum Togni;Paloma Virgínia Gambarra Nitão Milane;Kelly Ramalho Cavalcante;Maria Alice de Medeiros;Carmen Silvia Soares Pires;Edison Ryoiti Sujii
Vol. 52 , No. 11 , pp. 134-140
237 views DOI Abstract
pupal case description of systropus (systropus) fumipennis westwood, 1842 (diptera: bombyliidae: toxophorinae: systropodini)
;Leandro Silva Barbosa;Barbara Proença;André Mallemont Cunha
Vol. 56 , No. 13 , pp. 159-162
231 views DOI Abstract
2009
ucai, novo gênero de anacolini (coleoptera, cerambycidae, prioninae) do brasil ucai, a new genus of anacolini (coleoptera, cerambycidae, prioninae) from brazil
;Maria Helena M. Galileo;Ubirajara R. Martins
Vol. 49 , No. 7 , pp. 93-95
230 views DOI Abstract
2006
revision of prophorostoma townsend, 1927 (diptera, tachinidae, dexiinae), with the description of a new species
;Silvio Shigueo Nihei;Marcelo Petratti Pansonato
Vol. 46 , No. 21 , pp. 239-244
226 views DOI Abstract
2007
variação do colorido elitral, nova espécie e novos registros em cometes audinet-serville, 1828 (coleoptera, cerambycidae, disteniinae)
;Frank T. Hovore;Antonio Santos-Silva
Vol. 47 , No. 8 , pp. 113-125
216 views DOI Abstract
2004
a comparative study of the ovaries in some brazilian bees (hymenoptera; apoidea)
;Gustavo Ferreira Martins;José Eduardo Serrão
Vol. 44 , No. 3 , pp. 45-53
208 views DOI Abstract
2010
o conhecimento sobre morcegos (chiroptera: mammalia) do estado do espírito santo, sudeste do brasil
;Poliana Mendes;Thiago Bernardi Vieira;Monik Oprea;Sílvia Ramira Lopes;Albert David Ditchfield;Marlon Zortéa
Vol. 50 , No. 22 , pp. 363-373
202 views DOI Abstract
2010
gênero drycothaea (coleoptera, cerambycidae, lamiinae): chave para espécies, nova combinação, espécies novas
;Maria Helena M. Galileo;Ubirajara R. Martins
Vol. 50 , No. 5 , pp. 69-75
201 views DOI Abstract
View All 37 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.