Indexed in Journament

transplant infectious disease

ISSN 1398-2273· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #16,739 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
12 Articles
Scores higher than 42.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name transplant infectious disease
Abbreviated Name transplant infectious disease
ISSN 1398-2273
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/13993062

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for transplant infectious disease
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 77.8 25.8
Innovation 19.5 27.4
Community Impact 5.0 7.8
Content Distribution 52.2 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (12)

2009
towards a critique of political democracy
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 68-75
327 views Abstract
2006
2011
lacanian materialism and the question of the real
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 155-166
300 views Abstract
2006
ontology and appearing: documentary realism as a mathematical thought
Vol. 2 , No. 1-2 , pp. 241-262
218 views Abstract
2007
the relevance of hegel's logic
Vol. 3 , No. 2-3 , pp. 211-221
186 views Abstract
2006
saint paul: apostle, militant, communist
Vol. 2 , No. 1-2 , pp. 345-349
186 views Abstract
2006
the bourgeois and the islamist, or, the other subjects of politics
Vol. 2 , No. 1-2 , pp. 15-38
183 views Abstract
2006
after the surprising conversions (jacqueline rose, the question of zion)
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 367-372
85 views Abstract
2012
castoriadis on althusser and the crisis of marxism
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 100-116
22 views Abstract
2011
lacanian materialism and the question of the real
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 155-166
300 views Abstract
2009
introduction
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 1-7
18 views Abstract
2009
towards a critique of political democracy
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 68-75
327 views Abstract
2007
the relevance of hegel's logic
Vol. 3 , No. 2-3 , pp. 211-221
186 views Abstract
2006
ontology and appearing: documentary realism as a mathematical thought
Vol. 2 , No. 1-2 , pp. 241-262
218 views Abstract
2006
the bourgeois and the islamist, or, the other subjects of politics
Vol. 2 , No. 1-2 , pp. 15-38
183 views Abstract
2006
saint paul: apostle, militant, communist
Vol. 2 , No. 1-2 , pp. 345-349
186 views Abstract
Journament Score
31.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #16,739 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

31.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

77.8/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

19.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

52.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.