revista iberoamericana de micologia | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1131 / 33,944
📉 Poor
Overall Score
40.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
29
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

revista iberoamericana de micologia

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name revista iberoamericana de micologia
Abbreviated Name revista iberoamericana de micologia
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.reviberoammicol.com
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (10 total)

2017
patterns of admission and factors associated with neonatal mortality among neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of university of gondar hospital, northwest ethiopia
;Demisse AG;Alemu F;Gizaw MA;Tigabu Z
Vol. Volume 8 , pp. 57-64
259 views Abstract
2020
community acceptance and utilization of maternal and community-based neonatal care services provided by health extension workers in rural sidama zone: barriers and enablers: a qualitative study
;Gebretsadik A;Melaku N;Haji Y
Vol. Volume 11 , pp. 203-217
258 views Abstract
2019
Clinical problems in medical mycology: problem number 53
Messina, F.
Vol. 36 , pp. 93-95
252 views DOI
2014
antiretroviral treatment in hiv-1 infected pediatric patients: focus on efavirenz
;Larru B;Eby J;Lowenthal ED
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 29-42
213 views Abstract
2016
management options for pediatric patients who stutter: current challenges and future directions
;Donaghy MA;Smith KA
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 71-77
182 views Abstract
2014
profile of imatinib in pediatric leukemia
;Burke MJ
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 1-7
142 views Abstract
2016
efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in adolescents
;Kellen R;Silverberg NB;Lebwohl M
Vol. Volume 7 , pp. 109-120
130 views Abstract
2015
methods to improve joint attention in young children with autism: a review
;Paparella T;Freeman SF
Vol. 2015 , No. default , pp. 65-78
95 views Abstract
2013
pediatric clinical trials: current scenario in the asia pacific region
;Saldanha LM;Nayak S;Sng A;Long ML;Schrader E;Rahman A;Lansang EZ;Wai K;Lee K
Vol. 2013 , No. default , pp. 47-54
63 views Abstract
2014
overview of the use of recombinant factor viia in children
;Puetz J
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 141-148
62 views Abstract
40
Overall
Poor
29
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

28.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.