Indexed in Journament

zhong yao cai = zhongyaocai = journal of chinese medicinal materials

ISSN 1001-4454· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,540 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
33 Articles
Scores higher than 60.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name zhong yao cai
Abbreviated Name zhong yao cai
ISSN 1001-4454

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 8.6
Content Distribution 67.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.1
Accessibility — 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity — 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 8.6 13.4
Content Distribution 67.4 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (33)

2017
a multi-parametric mathematical approach on the selection of optimum insulation thicknesses in buildings
;John Gelegenis;Petros Axaopoulos
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 15-
362 views DOI Abstract
2015
a production model for construction: a theoretical framework
;Ricardo Antunes;Vicente Gonzalez
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 209-228
323 views DOI Abstract
2018
gender differences in environmental perspectives among urban design professionals
;Marita Wallhagen;Ola Eriksson;Patrik Sörqvist
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 59-
310 views DOI Abstract
2014
gis modeling of solar neighborhood potential at a fine spatiotemporal resolution
;Annie Chow;Alan S. Fung;Songnian Li
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 195-206
305 views DOI Abstract
2016
optimized load shedding approach for grid-connected dc microgrid systems under realistic constraints
;Leonardo Trigueiro dos Santos;Manuela Sechilariu;Fabrice Locment
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 50-
302 views DOI Abstract
2016
thin films for advanced glazing applications
;Ann-Louise Anderson;Shuqun Chen;Luz Romero;Işıl Top;Russell Binions
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 37-
299 views DOI Abstract
2015
heater choice, dampness and mould growth in 26 new zealand homes: a study of propensity for mould growth using encapsulated fungal spores
;Mikael Boulic;Robyn Anne Phipps;Malcolm Cunningham;Don John Cleland;Pär Fjällström;Keiko Abe;Philippa Howden-Chapman
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 149-162
294 views DOI Abstract
2016
optimization of natural ventilation of “yinzi” dwellings in western hunan based on orthogonal experiment and cfd
;Sheng Liu;Chunhua Huang
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 25-
277 views DOI Abstract
2018
from ‘rigid’ to ‘resilient’: a proposed self-build relocatable sip construction mechanism for sustainable social housing models in uae
;Khaled Galal Ahmed
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 58-
274 views DOI Abstract
2015
assessment of the potential to achieve very low energy use in public buildings in china with advanced window and shading systems
;Eleanor S. Lee;Xiufeng Pang;Andrew McNeil;Sabine Hoffmann;Anothai Thanachareonkit;Zhengrong Li;Yong Ding
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 668-699
270 views DOI Abstract
2020
key decision-makers and persuaders in the selection of energy-efficient technologies in eu residential buildings
;Clara Camarasa;Raphael Heiberger;Lena Hennes;Martin Jakob;York Ostermeyer;Leonardo Rosado
Vol. 10 , No. 70 , pp. 70-
175 views DOI Abstract
2020
modeling of an aerogel-based “thermal break” for super-insulated window frames
;Alessandro Cannavale;Francesco Martellotta;Umberto Berardi;Chiara Rubino;Stefania Liuzzi;Vincenzo De Carlo;Ubaldo Ayr
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 60-
192 views DOI Abstract
2018
gender differences in environmental perspectives among urban design professionals
;Marita Wallhagen;Ola Eriksson;Patrik Sörqvist
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 59-
310 views DOI Abstract
2018
reducing the loss of built heritage in seismic areas
;Giuliana Cardani;Paola Belluco
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 19-
210 views DOI Abstract
2018
from ‘rigid’ to ‘resilient’: a proposed self-build relocatable sip construction mechanism for sustainable social housing models in uae
;Khaled Galal Ahmed
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 58-
274 views DOI Abstract
2018
sustainable bio-aggregate-based composites containing hemp hurds and alternative binder
;Nadezda Stevulova;Julia Cigasova;Ivana Schwarzova;Alena Sicakova;Jozef Junak
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 25-
178 views DOI Abstract
2018
acknowledgement to reviewers of buildings in 2017
;Buildings Editorial Office
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 8-
86 views DOI Abstract
2017
the effectiveness of thermal insulation in lightweight steel-framed walls with respect to its position
;Eduardo Roque;Paulo Santos
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 13-
192 views DOI Abstract
2017
the acoustics of the double elliptical vault of the royal palace of caserta (italy)
;Umberto Berardi;Gino Iannace;Amelia Trematerra
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 18-
132 views DOI Abstract
2017
performance evaluation of well-insulated versions of contemporary wall systems—a case study of london for a warmer climate
;Seyed Masoud Sajjadian
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 6-
162 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,540 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

67.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.