zhong yao cai = zhongyaocai = journal of chinese medicinal materials | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2882 / 33,953
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

zhong yao cai = zhongyaocai = journal of chinese medicinal materials

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name zhong yao cai
Abbreviated Name zhong yao cai
ISSN 1001-4454
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (33 total)

2017
a multi-parametric mathematical approach on the selection of optimum insulation thicknesses in buildings
;John Gelegenis;Petros Axaopoulos
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 15-
297 views DOI Abstract
2018
gender differences in environmental perspectives among urban design professionals
;Marita Wallhagen;Ola Eriksson;Patrik Sörqvist
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 59-
267 views DOI Abstract
2016
optimized load shedding approach for grid-connected dc microgrid systems under realistic constraints
;Leonardo Trigueiro dos Santos;Manuela Sechilariu;Fabrice Locment
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 50-
263 views DOI Abstract
2015
heater choice, dampness and mould growth in 26 new zealand homes: a study of propensity for mould growth using encapsulated fungal spores
;Mikael Boulic;Robyn Anne Phipps;Malcolm Cunningham;Don John Cleland;Pär Fjällström;Keiko Abe;Philippa Howden-Chapman
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 149-162
262 views DOI Abstract
2014
gis modeling of solar neighborhood potential at a fine spatiotemporal resolution
;Annie Chow;Alan S. Fung;Songnian Li
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 195-206
260 views DOI Abstract
2015
a production model for construction: a theoretical framework
;Ricardo Antunes;Vicente Gonzalez
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 209-228
259 views DOI Abstract
2016
thin films for advanced glazing applications
;Ann-Louise Anderson;Shuqun Chen;Luz Romero;Işıl Top;Russell Binions
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 37-
250 views DOI Abstract
2016
optimization of natural ventilation of “yinzi” dwellings in western hunan based on orthogonal experiment and cfd
;Sheng Liu;Chunhua Huang
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 25-
237 views DOI Abstract
2018
from ‘rigid’ to ‘resilient’: a proposed self-build relocatable sip construction mechanism for sustainable social housing models in uae
;Khaled Galal Ahmed
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 58-
225 views DOI Abstract
2015
the effect of agile workspace and remote working on experiences of privacy, crowding and satisfaction
;Trevor Keeling;Derek Clements-Croome;Etienne Roesch
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 880-898
223 views DOI Abstract
View All 33 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.