zeitschrift fur evidenz, fortbildung und qualitat im gesundheitswesen | Journament

Journal Ranking

#436 / 33,939
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

zeitschrift fur evidenz, fortbildung und qualitat im gesundheitswesen

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name z evid fortbild qual gesundhwes
Abbreviated Name z evid fortbild qual gesundhwes
ISSN 2212-0289
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/zeitschrift-fur-evidenz-fortbildung-und-qualitat-im-gesundheitswesen
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2019
[Development of guideline-based quality indicators: a qualitative study on barriers and facilitating factors from the perspective of S3-guideline authors].
Arnold, Katrin;Breuing, Jessica;Becker, Monika;Nothacker, Monika;Neugebauer, Edmund;Schmitt, Jochen;Deckert, Stefanie;
Vol. 147-148 , pp. 34-44
355 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Improving psychosocial health of nursing home residents: a systematic review of interventions for prevention and health promotion].
Nordhausen, Thomas;Langner, Henriette;Fleischer, Steffen;Meyer, Gabriele;Berg, Almuth;
Vol. 147-148 , pp. 7-19
350 views DOI Abstract
2019
Efficacy of decision support systems to improve medication safety – results of the evaluation of the “Arzneimittelkonto NRW”
Witte, J.
Vol. 147-148 , pp. 80-89
332 views DOI
2015
[Nursing and industry relations: literature review and conflicts of interest survey].
Nordhausen, Thomas;Lins, Sabine;Panfil, Eva-Maria;Köpke, Sascha;Leino-Kilpi, Helena;Langer, Gero;Meyer, Gabriele;
Vol. 109 , No. 8 , pp. 621-31
322 views DOI Abstract
2013
[Students in Training to Become Biology Teachers - a controlled phase II trial (NCT01567267)].
Matic-Strametz, Mirjana;Strametz, Reinhard;Bohrt, Kevin;Ochsendorf, Falk;Weberschock, Tobias;
Vol. 107 , No. 1 , pp. 53-61
303 views DOI Abstract
2020
[Improving cognitive resources of nursing home residents: a systematic review of prevention and health promotion interventions].
Langner, Henriette;Nordhausen, Thomas;Fleischer, Steffen;Meyer, Gabriele;Berg, Almuth;
302 views DOI Abstract
2019
[For discussion: What potential does digitization hold for patient safety?]
Weigand, Marcel;Köster-Steinebach, Ilona;
288 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Experiences with health technologies to support physical activity in people over the age of 65: A qualitative survey of the requirements for the development of preventive technologies for a heterogeneous target group].
Pauls, Alexander;Gacek, Stefanie;Lipprandt, Myriam;Koppelin, Frauke;
Vol. 144-145 , pp. 62-71
275 views DOI Abstract
2019
[What can structured doctoral programs contribute to ensure quality of medical dissertations and scientific careers/junior promotion? An evaluation using the "Experimental Medicine" program initiative of Ulm University as an example].
Claudia, Grab-Kroll;Achim, Schneider;Oliver, Keis;Benjamin, Mayer;Thomas, Wirth;Thomas, Barth;Wolfgang, Oechsner;Markus, Huber-Lang;
271 views DOI Abstract
2010
violÊncia e meio ambiente: pode a educaÇÃo ambiental contribuir para a paz e a sustentabilidade?
;Gustavo Ferreira da Costa Lima
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 231-247
270 views Abstract
View All 15 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.