ophthalmologica journal international d'ophtalmologie international journal of ophthalmology zeitschrift fur augenheilkunde | Journament

Journal Ranking

#432 / 33,939
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 23 hours ago

ophthalmologica journal international d'ophtalmologie international journal of ophthalmology zeitschrift fur augenheilkunde

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name ophthalmologica
Abbreviated Name ophthalmologica
ISSN 1423-0267
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.karger.com/oph
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2019
Strategies to Tackle the Global Burden of Diabetic Retinopathy: From Epidemiology to Artificial Intelligence.
Wong, Tien Yin;Sabanayagam, Charumathi;
, pp. 1-12
337 views DOI Abstract
1995
Contrast sensitivity evaluation in eyes predisposed to age-related macular degeneration and presenting normal visual acuity
Stangos N;Voutas S;Topouzis F;Karampatakis V;;
Vol. 209 , No. 4 , pp. -
330 views Abstract
2020
Large idiopathic macular hole surgery: remodeling of outer retinal layers after traditional internal limiting membrane peeling or inverted flap technique.
Bottoni, Ferdinando;Parrulli, Salvatore;Mete, Maurizio;D'Agostino, Isabella;Cereda, Matteo;Cigada, Mario;Maggio, Emilia;Maraone, Giorgia;Iacovello, Daniela;Bottega, Elisa;Staurenghi, Giovanni;Pertile, Grazia;
309 views DOI Abstract
1995
Contrast Sensitivity Evaluation in Eyes Predisposed to Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Presenting Normal Visual Acuity
N. Stangos;S. Voutas;F. Topouzis;V. Karampatakis;
Vol. 209 , No. 4 , pp. 194-198
285 views Abstract
2017
right heart catheterization procedures in patients with suspicion of pulmonary hypertension – experiences of a tertiary center
;Maciej Grymuza;Katarzyna Małaczyńska-Rajpold;Stanisław Jankiewicz;Andrzej Siniawski;Marek Grygier;Przemysław Mitkowski;Marta Kałużna-Oleksy;Maciej Lesiak;Tatiana Mularek-Kubzdela;Aleksander Araszkiewicz
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. 295-301
265 views DOI Abstract
2016
the relation of platelet–lymphocyte ratio and coronary collateral circulation in patients with non-st segment elevation myocardial infarction
;Serkan Akdag;Aytac Akyol;Muntecep Asker;Fatih Ozturk;Hasan Ali Gumrukcuoglu
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. 224-230
250 views DOI Abstract
2017
intravascular ultrasonography guided 60-mm long drug-eluting tapered stent implantation in a long calcified lesion in a patient with stable coronary artery disease
;Jakub Podolec;Jakub Baran;Łukasz Niewiara;Piotr Odrowąż-Pieniążek;Krzysztof Żmudka
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 88-89
238 views DOI
2016
triple anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention – real life assessment
;Paweł Bogacki;Anna Kabłak-Ziembicka;Krzysztof Bryniarski;Leszek Wrotniak;Elżbieta Ostrowska-Kaim;Krzysztof Żmudka;Tadeusz Przewłocki
Vol. 12 , No. 4 , pp. 303-313
216 views DOI Abstract
2016
successful percutaneous coronary intervention after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with corevalve bioprosthesis
;Zenon Huczek;Kajetan Grodecki;Bartosz Rymuza;Janusz Kochman;Krzysztof J. Filipiak;Grzegorz Opolski
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 175-176
216 views DOI
2016
first report of percutaneous closure of anterior mitral leaflet perforation using a paravalvular leak device (pld)
;Sebastian Raczkiewicz;Marzena Matejszczak-Woś;Piotr Pysz;Ewa Zaremba-Flis;Grzegorz Smolka;Andrzej Kleinrok
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. 274-275
199 views DOI
View All 13 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.