Indexed in Journament

journal of solid state chemistry

ISSN 0022-4596· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,972 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
61 Articles
Scores higher than 11.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal of solid state chemistry
Abbreviated Name journal of solid state chemistry
ISSN 0022-4596
URL http://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-solid-state-chemistry

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for journal of solid state chemistry
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 4.3 13.4
Content Distribution 65.1 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (61)

2015
nosocomial infections and risk factors in intensive care unit of a university hospital
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 233-239
472 views DOI Abstract
2013
the relationship between microvascular complications and depression in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who use insulin
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 34-39
468 views Abstract
2012
growth pattern in children with beta-thalassemia major and its relation with serum ferritin, igf1 and igfbp3
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 157-163
461 views Abstract
2015
investigation of slc6a4 gene expression in autism spectrum disorders
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. 165-169
425 views DOI Abstract
2016
prognostic value of mean platelet volume and platelet to lymphocyte ratio in laryngeal carcinoma
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 134-138
420 views DOI Abstract
2012
relationship between the severity of mitral regurgitation, left ventricular dysfunction and plasma brain natriuretic peptide level: an observational strain imaging study
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 451-456
363 views Abstract
2013
the effect of intravascular ultrasound usage for the implantation of drug-eluting stent on the rate of acute thrombosis and restenosis
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 84-89
354 views Abstract
2012
does oxygen use during general anesthesia cause an artifact in magnetic resonance images?
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 477-482
352 views Abstract
2019
Starch functionalized magnetite nanoparticles: New insight into the structural and magnetic properties
Vol. 277 , pp. 587-593
297 views DOI
2019
A multi-technique approach for studying Na triclinic and hexagonal birnessites
Vol. 272 , pp. 234-243
326 views DOI
2018
Interaction of ammonium with birnessite: Evidence of a chemical and structural transformation in alkaline aqueous medium
Vol. 258 , pp. 543-550
197 views DOI
Journament Score
28.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,972 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

28.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

65.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.