Chemical research in toxicology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1735 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

Chemical research in toxicology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Chem Res Toxicol
Abbreviated Name chem res toxicol
ISSN 1520-5010
Aim and Scope
URL http://pubs.acs.org/journal/crtoec
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (37 total)

2012
A Perspective on the Toxicology of Marine Toxins
Luis M. Botana;Luis M. Botana;
Vol. 25 , No. 9 , pp. 1800-1804
432 views DOI
2020
Synergy between Experiments and Computations: A Green Channel for Revealing Metabolic Mechanism of Xenobiotics in Chemical Toxicology.
Ji, Li;
415 views DOI Abstract
2016
Toxicological Perspective on Climate Change: Aquatic Toxins
Luis M. Botana;Luis M. Botana;
Vol. 29 , No. 4 , pp. 619-625
376 views DOI
2017
A Rapid Throughput Method To Extract DNA from Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Tissues for Biomonitoring Carcinogenic DNA Adducts.
Yun, Byeong Hwa;Xiao, Shun;Yao, Lihua;Krishnamachari, Sesha;Rosenquist, Thomas A;Dickman, Kathleen G;Grollman, Arthur P;Murugan, Paari;Weight, Christopher J;Turesky, Robert J;
Vol. 30 , No. 12 , pp. 2130-2139
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
Multifunctional mono-triazole derivatives inhibit Aβ42 aggregation, Cu2+ mediated Aβ42 aggregation and protect against Aβ42 induced cytotoxicity.
Kaur, Amandeep;Narang, Simranjeet Singh;Kaur, Anupamjeet;Mann, Sukhmani;Priyadarshi, Nitesh;Goyal, Bhupesh;Singhal, Nitin Kumar;Goyal, Deepti;
355 views DOI Abstract
2019
Metabolic Impairments Caused by a "Chemical Cocktail" of DDE and Selenium in Mice Using Direct Infusion Triple Quadrupole Time-of-Flight and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.
Rodríguez-Moro, Gema;Abril, Nieves;Jara-Biedma, Rocío;Ramírez-Acosta, Sara;Gómez-Ariza, José Luis;García-Barrera, Tamara;
355 views DOI Abstract
2020
Bioisosteric Replacement of Amide Group with 1,2,3-Triazoles in Acetaminophen Addresses Reactive Oxygen Species-Mediated Hepatotoxic Insult in Wistar Albino Rats.
Sahu, Adarsh;Das, Debashree;Sahu, Preeti;Mishra, Shweta;Sakthivel, Ayyamperumal;Gajbhiye, Asmita;Agrawal, Ramkishore;
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
MOVING BEYOND BINARY PREDICTIONS OF HUMAN DRUG-INDUCED LIVER INJURY (DILI) TOWARDS CONTRASTING RELATIVE RISK POTENTIAL.
Aleo, Michael D;Shah, Falgun;Allen, Scott;Barton, Hugh A;Costales, Chester;Lazzaro, Sarah;Leung, Louis;Nilson, Andrea;Obach, R Scott;Rodrigues, A David;Will, Yvonne;
325 views DOI Abstract
2020
Therapeutic potential of carnosine and its derivatives in the treatment of human diseases.
Chmielewska, Klaudia;Dzierzbicka, Krystyna;Inkielewicz-Stępniak, Iwona;Przybyłowska, Maja;
318 views DOI Abstract
2008
Azaspiracid substituent at C1 is relevant to in vitro toxicity
Vilariño N;Nicolaou KC;Frederick MO;Cagide E;Alfonso C;Alonso E;Vieytes MR;Botana LM;;
Vol. 21 , No. 9 , pp. -
304 views Abstract
View All 37 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.