PeerJ | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1203 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
43
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 10 hours ago

PeerJ

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci
Short Name PeerJ
Abbreviated Name peerj
ISSN 2167-8359
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.peerj.com
Author Instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Jul 03, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (189 total)

2014
scikit-image: image processing in Python
Stéfan van der Walt; Johannes L. Schönberger; Juan Nunez-Iglesias; François Boulogne; Joshua Warner; Neil Yager; Emmanuelle Gouillart; Tony Yu
6,844 views DOI
2020
The immunostimulatory activity of polysaccharides from Glycyrrhiza uralensis
Aipire, Adila;Mahabati, Mahepali;Cai, Shanshan;Wei, Xianxian;Yuan, Pengfei;Aimaier, Alimu;Wang, Xinhui;Li, Jinyao;
Vol. 8 , pp. e8294-
611 views Abstract
2015
Health-related quality of life and emotional and behavioral difficulties after extreme preterm birth: developmental trajectories
Vederhus, Bente Johanne;Eide, Geir Egil;Natvig, Gerd Karin;Markestad, Trond;Graue, Marit;Halvorsen, Thomas;
Vol. 3 , pp. e738-
599 views Abstract
2017
Is there a relation between dental anxiety, fear and general psychological status?
Yildirim, Tuba Talo;Dundar, Serkan;Bozoglan, Alihan;Karaman, Tahir;Dildes, Neval;Kaya, Filiz Acun;Altintas, Eyyup;Oztekin, Faruk;Atas, Osman;Alan, Hilal;
Vol. 5 , pp. e2978-
558 views Abstract
2018
Model-based in silico analysis of the PI3K/Akt pathway: the elucidation of cross-talk between diabetes and breast cancer
Rehman, Sammia;Obaid, Ayesha;Naz, Anam;Ali, Amjad;Kanwal, Shahzina;Ahmad, Jamil;
Vol. 6 , pp. e5917-
546 views Abstract
2018
Synthesis, characterization and antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles using .
Shehzad, Adeeb;Qureshi, Munibah;Jabeen, Saima;Ahmad, Rizwan;Alabdalall, Amira H;Aljafary, Meneerah Abdulrahman;Al-Suhaimi, Ebtesam;
Vol. 6 , pp. e6086
535 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of extracellular polymeric substances extracted from waste activated sludge as a renewable corrosion inhibitor.
Go, Liew Chien;Holmes, William;Depan, Dilip;Hernandez, Rafael;
Vol. 7 , pp. e7193
495 views DOI Abstract
2019
Optimization of extraction conditions and determination of purine content in marine fish during boiling.
Li, Tingting;Ren, Likun;Wang, Dangfeng;Song, Minjie;Li, Qiuying;Li, Jianrong;
Vol. 7 , pp. e6690
484 views DOI Abstract
2018
A tuber mustard AP2/ERF transcription factor gene, , functioning in abscisic acid and abiotic stress responses, and evolutionary trajectory of the homologous genes in species.
Xiang, Liuxin;Liu, Chao;Luo, Jingzhi;He, Lin;Deng, Yushan;Yuan, Jie;Wu, Chaofeng;Cai, Yingfan;
Vol. 6 , pp. e6071
478 views DOI Abstract
2019
acute toxicity evaluation and molecular mechanism study of antiproliferative activity of a novel indole Schiff base -diiminato manganese complex in hormone-dependent and triple negative breast cancer cells.
Farghadani, Reyhaneh;Seifaddinipour, Maryam;Rajarajeswaran, Jayakumar;Abdulla, Mahmood Ameen;Mohd Hashim, Najihah Binti;Khaing, Si Lay;Salehen, Nur'ain Binti;
Vol. 7 , pp. e7686
456 views DOI Abstract
View All 189 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
43
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

42.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.