Indexed in Journament

archives of internal medicine

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #7,997 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
44 Articles
Scores higher than 72.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name archives of internal medicine
Abbreviated Name archives of internal medicine

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 7.9
Content Distribution 65.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for archives of internal medicine
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 7.9 7.8
Content Distribution 65.4 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (44)

1999
Enteric infections and diarrhea in human immunodeficiency virus-infected persons: prospective community-based cohort study. Swiss HIV Cohort Study
Vol. 159 , No. 13 , pp. -
590 views Abstract
2011
Incidence and transmission patterns of acute hepatitis C in the United States, 1982-2006
Vol. 171 , No. 3 , pp. -
577 views Abstract
2004
Comparison of Short-Course (5 Days) and Standard (10 Days) Treatment for Uncomplicated Cellulitis
Vol. 164 , No. 15 , pp. 1669-1674
541 views Abstract
2009
Effects of Web- and Computer-Based Smoking Cessation Programs: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Vol. 169 , No. 10 , pp. 929-937
511 views Abstract
1996
Prevalence and pathogenicity of Clostridium difficile in hospitalized patients. A French multicenter study
Vol. 156 , No. 13 , pp. -
500 views Abstract
1996
A 1-year trial of nasal mupirocin in the prevention of recurrent staphylococcal nasal colonization and skin infection
Vol. 156 , No. 10 , pp. -
473 views Abstract
1986
Microbiologic evaluation of cutaneous cellulitis in adults
Vol. 146 , No. 2 , pp. -
471 views Abstract
1999
Health and economic outcomes of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Vol. 159 , No. 10 , pp. -
469 views Abstract
1970
Comparison of short-course (5 days) and standard (10 days) treatment for uncomplicated cellulitis
Vol. 164 , No. 15 , pp. -
466 views Abstract
1989
Quantitative cultures of biopsy specimens from cutaneous cellulitis
Vol. 149 , No. 2 , pp. -
438 views Abstract
2011
Incidence and Transmission Patterns of Acute Hepatitis C in the United States, 1982-2006
Vol. 171 , No. 3 , pp. 242-248
289 views Abstract
2011
Incidence and transmission patterns of acute hepatitis C in the United States, 1982-2006
Vol. 171 , No. 3 , pp. -
577 views Abstract
2010
Low Back Pain and Best Practice Care: A Survey of General Practice Physicians
Vol. 170 , No. 3 , pp. 271-277
137 views Abstract
2009
Effects of Web- and computer-based smoking cessation programs: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Vol. 169 , No. 10 , pp. -
351 views Abstract
2009
Effects of Web- and Computer-Based Smoking Cessation Programs: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Vol. 169 , No. 10 , pp. 929-937
511 views Abstract
2008
Use of corticosteroids in treating infectious diseases
Vol. 168 , No. 10 , pp. -
428 views Abstract
2008
Use of Corticosteroids in Treating Infectious Diseases
Vol. 168 , No. 10 , pp. 1034-1046
273 views Abstract
2007
A predictive model of recurrent lower extremity cellulitis in a population-based cohort
Vol. 167 , No. 7 , pp. -
346 views Abstract
2006
A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The GAD-7
Vol. 166 , No. 10 , pp. 1092-1097
169 views Abstract
Journament Score
36.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #7,997 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

65.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.