Indexed in Journament

european journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the working group on cardiovascular nursing of the european society of cardiology

ISSN 1873-1953· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
39.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #2,861 of 29,298 scored journals (34,018 indexed)
56 Articles
Scores higher than 90.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name eur j cardiovasc nurs
Abbreviated Name eur j cardiovasc nurs
ISSN 1873-1953

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Timeliness 100.0
Diversity 55.6
Innovation 15.0
Community Impact 5.7
Content Distribution 27.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.5
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 100.0 3.0
Diversity 55.6 25.9
Innovation 15.0 24.1
Community Impact 5.7 5.6
Content Distribution 27.8 89.4
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (56)

2019
Effect of a nurse-led individualized self-management program for Chinese patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Jiang, Wenhui;Feng, Mei;Gao, Chunyan;Li, Juanli;Gao, Rui;Wang, Wenru;
, pp. 1474515119889197
398 views DOI Abstract
2011
Person-Centered Care — Ready for Prime Time
Inger Ekman, Karl Swedberg, Charles Taft, Anders Lindseth, Astrid Norberg, Eva Brink, Jane Carlsson, Synneve Dahlin‐Ivanoff, Inga‐Lill Johansson, Karin Kjellgren, Eva Lidén, Joakim Öhlén, Lars‐Eric Olsson, Henrik Rosén, Martin Rydmark, Katharina S. Sunnerhagen
179 views DOI Abstract
2025
Collaborative Couple-Based Management Using King's Theory Improves Health Behaviors After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Artery Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Yang, Qiaohong; Ma, Hualong; Huang, Jingjuan; Liu, Xianliang; Wang, Yanfeng; Li, Zihan; Cheng, Yingying; Wu, Qinyang; Hu, Ke; Liu, Jiayu; Qiu, Weiyu; Chao, Yingyu; Lyu, Qiyuan
140 views DOI Abstract
2003
Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action
Sabina De Geest, E Sabaté
121 views DOI
2026
Implementing caregiver-reported outcomes in cardiovascular diseases: Challenges with documentation and provision of services to support caregivers
Julie T. Bidwell, Martha Abshire Saylor
98 views DOI
2026
Recognizing peer reviewers: developing the reciprocation model at EJCN
Faye Forsyth, Liz Perrotta, Philip Moons
86 views DOI
2026
The effect of serious games on cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abdullah Avcı, Emine Kaplan Serin, Selma Kahraman
81 views DOI Abstract
2026
The Impact of Online-Offline Integrated Out-of-hospital Education on Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Zhaoying Zhu, Ruonan Yang, S Li, Siying Ji, Xinyue Shi, Menghan Zhu, Yangfan Nie, Anan Li, Yunying Hou
75 views DOI Abstract
2026
Early Outcomes of Nurse-Led Outreach for Lost to Follow-Up Patients after Pediatric Heart Surgery
Arielle Scarpati, Alyssia Venna, Mitchell Haverty, Alix Fetch, Kristine Mehrtens, Annette Ansong, Yves d’Udekem, Jennifer Klein
68 views DOI Abstract
2026
Missing Data Essentials Part 2: Statistical Approaches to Missing Data in Cardiovascular Studies
Christopher S. Lee, Shirin O. Hiatt, N F Dieckmann, Jill Doyle, Quin E. Denfeld
68 views DOI Abstract
2026
Six-Minute Walk Distance Captures Broader Patient-Reported Health Than Peak Oxygen Uptake in Heart Failure
Ahmet Burak Altay, Hale Karapolat, Arzu Yağız On
7 views DOI
2026
Psychiatric consultations in cardiology departments – an 8-year experience
Szymon Florek, Alexander Suchodolski, Maja Butrym, Honorata Buniowska, Natalia Brozda, Mariola Szulik, Łukasz Kunert, Zbigniew F. Kalarus, Robert Pudło
18 views DOI Abstract
2026
Watching sports is associated with fewer depressive symptoms in adults with congenital heart disease
Masahiro Matsui, Keisei Kosaki, Naoto Kawamatsu, Yoshihiro Nozaki, Tomoko Machino‐Ohtsuka, Taishi Tsuji, Yoshio Nakata, Seiji Maeda, Kiyonobu Kigoshi, Tomoko Ishizu
16 views DOI Abstract
2026
Nurses identify organizational and educational requirements for technology-supported heart failure education: a qualitative study
Karolien Baldewijns, Els Vervaeke, Hilde Vandenhoudt, Heleen Deruytere, Romy Sels, Evi Lemmens, Dries Van Craen, Ruben Kimpen, Sarah Talboom, Stefaan Six
63 views DOI
2026
Greater frailty is associated with higher learning needs after cardiovascular surgery
Mine Ozturk, Şenay Karadağ Arlı
60 views DOI
2026
Nursing-sensitive quality indicators in heart transplant rehabilitation: a Nursing Role Effectiveness Model-based study
Maria Loureiro, João Duarte, Rúben Fernandes, Leandro Oliveira, Gonçalo F. Coutinho, María Manuela Martins, André Novo
27 views DOI
2026
Restricted more often than prescribed: physical activity counselling and guideline adherence in ambulatory patients with atrial fibrillation
Caroline Verdy, Soundous M’Rabet, F. Chagué, Charles Guénancia
19 views DOI Abstract
2026
Patient and parent voices in tetralogy of Fallot: A French social media analysis
Magalie Ladouceur, Marie Bergé, Gaëlle Marguin, Grégoire Albenque, Sébastien Hascoët
25 views DOI Abstract
2026
Psychological recovery after SCAD: Identifying protective and vulnerability factors using cluster analysis
Michael Le Grande, Michelle Rogerson, Alun C. Jackson, Stephanie Hesselson, Siiri E. Iismaa, Robert M. Graham, Jason C. Kovacic, Sarah Clarke, Barbara Murphy
29 views DOI Abstract
2026
The Association of Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (ACNAP) mandate 2026-2028: Advancing Equity and Excellence in Cardiovascular Care, Education and Science
Julie Sanders, Jeroen Hendriks, Leonie Klompstra
27 views DOI
Journament Score
39.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #2,861 of 29,298 scored
(34,018 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

15.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

27.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.