Indexed in Journament

european journal of cardiovascular nursing : journal of the working group on cardiovascular nursing of the european society of cardiology

ISSN 1873-1953· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,928 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
45 Articles
Scores higher than 38.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name eur j cardiovasc nurs
Abbreviated Name eur j cardiovasc nurs
ISSN 1873-1953

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.0
Timeliness 90.0
Innovation 15.0
Community Impact 4.3
Content Distribution 24.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.1
Accessibility — 17.9
Timeliness 90.0 19.2
Diversity — 28.8
Innovation 15.0 31.2
Community Impact 4.3 13.4
Content Distribution 24.8 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (45)

2019
Effect of a nurse-led individualized self-management program for Chinese patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
Jiang, Wenhui;Feng, Mei;Gao, Chunyan;Li, Juanli;Gao, Rui;Wang, Wenru;
, pp. 1474515119889197
359 views DOI Abstract
2011
Person-Centered Care — Ready for Prime Time
Inger Ekman, Karl Swedberg, Charles Taft, Anders Lindseth, Astrid Norberg, Eva Brink, Jane Carlsson, Synneve Dahlin‐Ivanoff, Inga‐Lill Johansson, Karin Kjellgren, Eva Lidén, Joakim Öhlén, Lars‐Eric Olsson, Henrik Rosén, Martin Rydmark, Katharina S. Sunnerhagen
154 views DOI Abstract
2025
Collaborative Couple-Based Management Using King's Theory Improves Health Behaviors After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Coronary Artery Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Yang, Qiaohong; Ma, Hualong; Huang, Jingjuan; Liu, Xianliang; Wang, Yanfeng; Li, Zihan; Cheng, Yingying; Wu, Qinyang; Hu, Ke; Liu, Jiayu; Qiu, Weiyu; Chao, Yingyu; Lyu, Qiyuan
108 views DOI Abstract
2003
Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action
Sabina De Geest, E Sabaté
94 views DOI
2026
Implementing caregiver-reported outcomes in cardiovascular diseases: Challenges with documentation and provision of services to support caregivers
Julie T. Bidwell, Martha Abshire Saylor
74 views DOI
2026
The Impact of Online-Offline Integrated Out-of-hospital Education on Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Zhaoying Zhu, Ruonan Yang, S Li, Siying Ji, Xinyue Shi, Menghan Zhu, Yangfan Nie, Anan Li, Yunying Hou
56 views DOI Abstract
2026
Missing Data Essentials Part 2: Statistical Approaches to Missing Data in Cardiovascular Studies
Christopher S. Lee, Shirin O. Hiatt, N F Dieckmann, Jill Doyle, Quin E. Denfeld
49 views DOI Abstract
2026
Recognizing peer reviewers: developing the reciprocation model at EJCN
Faye Forsyth, Liz Perrotta, Philip Moons
48 views DOI
2026
The effect of serious games on cardiopulmonary resuscitation training in nursing students: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abdullah Avcı, Emine Kaplan Serin, Selma Kahraman
46 views DOI Abstract
2026
Early Outcomes of Nurse-Led Outreach for Lost to Follow-Up Patients after Pediatric Heart Surgery
Arielle Scarpati, Alyssia Venna, Mitchell Haverty, Alix Fetch, Kristine Mehrtens, Annette Ansong, Yves d’Udekem, Jennifer Klein
37 views DOI Abstract
2026
Reduced readmission persists for two years after completion of a multidisciplinary heart failure management programme
Min‐Hui Liu, Chao‐Hung Wang, Wan-Tseng Hsu
7 views DOI
2026
Early nurse-detected delirium is a marker of 6-month mortality risk after acute coronary syndrome: A Multicentre Prospective Cohort Study
Ioanna Dimitriadou, Εvangelos C. Fradelos, John Skoularigis, Ioanna V Papathanasiou, Petros Galanis, Aikaterini Toska, Pavlos Sarafis, Dimitrios Papagiannis, Maria Saridi
9 views DOI
2026
Measurement matters: Introducing the ‘Psychometric Spotlight’ in the <i>European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing</i>
Philip Moons, Catriona Jennings, Jeroen Hendriks
9 views DOI
2026
Distinct Profiles of Heart-Focused Anxiety and Their Association with Kinesiophobia Among Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study
Jingwen Qin, Jiamin Li, Yan Zhou, Ping Yu, Xin Wang, Xin Pan, Kaizheng Gong
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
Policy Priorities to Strengthen Specialist Heart Failure Nursing in Europe: Findings from a Delphi Study
Adriano Friganović, C L Farrell, Céline Spoormans, Josep Comin-Colet, Antoni Bayés‐Genís, Taylor Morris, Karolay Lorenty, Lucy Morgan
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
Patients Find Ultrasound-Guided, Fluoroless Pacemaker Implantation Acceptable: A Cross-Sectional Survey of the RADICAl USe Study
Trinity Papamandjaris, Shahed Alemmari, Habib Khan
10 views DOI
2026
Latent profiles of social isolation and loneliness and their associations with inflammation and clinical outcomes in older patients with heart failure: A prospective longitudinal study
Mei Yang, Jinliang Li, Yilin Zhang, Wenjie Sun, Ziwei Geng, Xiuzhen Fan
12 views DOI Abstract
2026
Structured nurse-administered DOSS screening detects probable hypoactive delirium missed by clinical intervention criteria in cardiac surgery ICU patients
Paweł Kozak, Maciej Brzeziński, Maciej Michał Kowalik
14 views DOI
2026
Impact of a University Extension Program on Basic Life Support Training for Laypersons: A Quasi-Experimental Study
Nichollas Costa Rosa, Jeniffer Zettermann da Costa, Jorge Pasa, Diana S. Russo, Márcio Manozzo Boniatti
29 views DOI
2026
Correction to: Effectiveness of nurse-led clinics for patients with coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
33 views DOI
Journament Score
33.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,928 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

33.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

15.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

24.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.