Indexed in Journament

medecine/sciences

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
25.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #26,823 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
24 Articles
Scores higher than 8.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name medecine/sciences
Abbreviated Name medecine/sciences
URL https://www.medecinesciences.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for medecine/sciences
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 5.6 25.8
Innovation 48.0 27.4
Community Impact 5.7 7.8
Content Distribution 63.2 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (24)

2009
producción de un biofertilizante a partir de un aislamiento de azotobacter nigricans obtenido en un cultivo de stevia rebaudiana bert
Vol. 14 , No. 1 , pp. 71-78
350 views Abstract
2013
tolerancia al aluminio en especies vegetales: mecanismos y genes
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 283-310
306 views DOI Abstract
2005
compartimentaciÓn intracelular del acetato en astrocitos durante la prelactancia
Vol. 10 , No. Edición Especial II , pp. 39-50
288 views Abstract
2007
estandarizaciÓn de condiciones para la prueba cuantitativa del nmp con bacterias nitrificantes y denitrificantes usando como matriz compost
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 69-82
286 views Abstract
2004
producciÓn de la proteÍna recombinante humana hsc70 y su aplicaciÓn en el desarrollo de un sistema de detecciÓn por elisa
Vol. 9 , No. Edición Especial I , pp. 69-80
280 views Abstract
2007
evaluaciÓn de lactuca sativa y selenastrum capricornutum como indicadores de toxicidad en aguas
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 83-98
270 views Abstract
2004
study of the stability in real time of cryopreserved strain banks
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 35-42
269 views Abstract
2011
evaluación de actividades enzimáticas de fusarium spp., aislados de lesiones en humanos, animales y plantas
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 147-159
239 views Abstract
2019
2007
evaluaciÓn de algunos factores de riesgo de contraer hepatitis c en pacientes hemodializados
Vol. 12 , No. Edición Especial III , pp. 47-56
231 views Abstract
2019
2019
The valproate model of autism
Vol. 35 , pp. 236-243
104 views DOI
2018
between open sets and semi-open sets
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 9-20
40 views DOI Abstract
2018
2018
Why are new drugs so expensive?
Vol. 34 , pp. 354-361
208 views DOI
2017
environmental and zooplankton parameter changes during the drying of a saline shallow temporary lake in central argentina
Vol. 22 , No. 3 , pp. 177-200
150 views DOI Abstract
2017
asymptotic approximations to the isothermal pyrolysis of deodara leaves using gamma distribution
Vol. 22 , No. 3 , pp. 263-284
146 views DOI Abstract
2016
Asporin: The protective wall against triple-negative breast cancer
Vol. 32 , pp. 1019-1022
230 views DOI
2013
temperatura de almacenamiento y cantidad de arn extraído de plasma materno
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 181-187
192 views DOI Abstract
2013
tolerancia al aluminio en especies vegetales: mecanismos y genes
Vol. 18 , No. 3 , pp. 283-310
306 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
25.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #26,823 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

25.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

48.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

63.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.