Indexed in Journament

annals of internal medicine

ISSN 1539-3704· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
31.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,580 of 29,298 scored journals (34,014 indexed)
62 Articles
Scores higher than 53.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name ann intern med
Abbreviated Name annals of internal medicine
ISSN 1539-3704
URL http://www.annals.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.3 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 60.2 22.3
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 9.3 4.1
Content Distribution 17.1 88.9
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (62)

2018
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
Andrea C. Tricco; Erin Lillie; Wasifa Zarin; Kelly K. O’Brien; Heather Colquhoun; Danielle Levac; David Moher; Micah D.J. Peters; Tanya Horsley; Laura Weeks
40,114 views DOI
1997
Transdermal nicotine for mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Sandborn WJ;Tremaine WJ;Offord KP;Lawson GM;Petersen BT;Batts KP;Croghan IT;Dale LC;Schroeder DR;Hurt RD;;
Vol. 126 , No. 5 , pp. -
582 views Abstract
1995
Sporadic meningococcal disease in adults: results of a 5-year population-based study
Stephens DS;Hajjeh RA;Baughman WS;Harvey RC;Wenger JD;Farley MM;;
Vol. 123 , No. 12 , pp. -
535 views Abstract
1996
Doxycycline compared with azithromycin for treating women with genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections: an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis
Magid D;Douglas JM;Schwartz JS;;
Vol. 124 , No. 4 , pp. -
522 views Abstract
1998
Famciclovir for the suppression of symptomatic and asymptomatic herpes simplex virus reactivation in HIV-infected persons. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Schacker T;Hu HL;Koelle DM;Zeh J;Saltzman R;Boon R;Shaughnessy M;Barnum G;Corey L;;
Vol. 128 , No. 1 , pp. -
514 views Abstract
1985
Chemotherapy and chemoprophylaxis of travelers' diarrhea
DuPont HL;Ericsson CD;Johnson PC;;
Vol. 102 , No. 2 , pp. -
498 views Abstract
2006
The prevalence of hepatitis C virus infection in the United States, 1999 through 2002
Armstrong GL;Wasley A;Simard EP;McQuillan GM;Kuhnert WL;Alter MJ;;
Vol. 144 , No. 10 , pp. -
496 views Abstract
1977
Cutaneous abscesses. Anaerobic and aerobic bacteriology and outpatient management
Meislin HW;Lerner SA;Graves MH;McGehee MD;Kocka FE;Morello JA;Rosen P;;
Vol. 87 , No. 2 , pp. -
496 views Abstract
2019
The Cost-Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Second-Generation Antidepressants for Initial Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in the United States: A Decision Analytic Model.
Ross, Eric L;Vijan, Sandeep;Miller, Erin M;Valenstein, Marcia;Zivin, Kara;
491 views DOI Abstract
2016
Elbasvir-Grazoprevir to Treat Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Persons Receiving Opioid Agonist Therapy: A Randomized Trial
Dore GJ;Altice F;Litwin AH;Dalgard O;Gane EJ;Shibolet O;Luetkemeyer A;Nahass R;Peng CY;Conway B;Grebely J;Howe AY;Gendrano IN;Chen E;Huang HC;Dutko FJ;Nickle DC;Nguyen BY;Wahl J;Barr E;Robertson MN;Platt HL; ;;
Vol. 165 , No. 9 , pp. -
482 views Abstract
2020
Variation in False-Negative Rate of Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based SARS-CoV-2 Tests by Time Since Exposure
Kucirka LM;Lauer SA;Laeyendecker O;Boon D;Lessler J;;
Vol. 173 , No. 4 , pp. -
325 views Abstract
2020
Psychological Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Health Care Workers in Singapore
Tan BYQ;Chew NWS;Lee GKH;Jing M;Goh Y;Yeo LLL;Zhang K;Chin HK;Ahmad A;Khan FA;Shanmugam GN;Chan BPL;Sunny S;Chandra B;Ong JJY;Paliwal PR;Wong LYH;Sagayanathan R;Chen JT;Ng AYY;Teoh HL;Ho CS;Ho RC;Sharma VK;;
Vol. 173 , No. 4 , pp. -
273 views Abstract
2020
Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine for Treatment or Prophylaxis of COVID-19: A Living Systematic Review.
Hernandez, Adrian V;Roman, Yuani M;Pasupuleti, Vinay;Barboza, Joshuan J;White, C Michael;
425 views DOI Abstract
2020
COVID-19: The Worst Days of Our Careers.
Cunningham, Chinazo O;Diaz, Chanelle;Slawek, Deepika E;
381 views DOI
2020
Annals Graphic Medicine - Morning Thoughts on Day 7 of COVID-19 Social Isolation.
Siegel, Jennifer;
339 views DOI
2019
Should Health Care Demand Interpretable Artificial Intelligence or Accept "Black Box" Medicine?
Wang, Fei;Kaushal, Rainu;Khullar, Dhruv;
263 views DOI
2019
The Cost-Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Second-Generation Antidepressants for Initial Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in the United States: A Decision Analytic Model.
Ross, Eric L;Vijan, Sandeep;Miller, Erin M;Valenstein, Marcia;Zivin, Kara;
491 views DOI Abstract
2019
Disclosure of interests and management of conflicts of interest in clinical guidelines and guidance statements: Methods from the clinical guidelines committee of the American college of physicians
Qaseem, A.
Vol. 171 , pp. 354-361
269 views DOI
2019
Fool Me Twice? The Reemergence of Rofecoxib and the Orphan Drug Act.
Lee, Theodore T;Solomon, Daniel H;Kesselheim, Aaron S;
292 views DOI
2019
Web Exclusive. Annals Consult Guys - New Left Bundle Branch Block: Should This Block Surgery?
Merli, G.
Vol. 171 , pp. CG1
220 views DOI
Journament Score
31.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,580 of 29,298 scored
(34,014 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

31.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

60.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

17.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.