annals of internal medicine | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1437 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

annals of internal medicine

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name ann intern med
Abbreviated Name annals of internal medicine
ISSN 1539-3704
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.annals.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (61 total)

1997
Transdermal nicotine for mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Sandborn WJ;Tremaine WJ;Offord KP;Lawson GM;Petersen BT;Batts KP;Croghan IT;Dale LC;Schroeder DR;Hurt RD;;
Vol. 126 , No. 5 , pp. -
499 views Abstract
1995
Sporadic meningococcal disease in adults: results of a 5-year population-based study
Stephens DS;Hajjeh RA;Baughman WS;Harvey RC;Wenger JD;Farley MM;;
Vol. 123 , No. 12 , pp. -
445 views Abstract
1996
Doxycycline compared with azithromycin for treating women with genital Chlamydia trachomatis infections: an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis
Magid D;Douglas JM;Schwartz JS;;
Vol. 124 , No. 4 , pp. -
444 views Abstract
1985
Chemotherapy and chemoprophylaxis of travelers' diarrhea
DuPont HL;Ericsson CD;Johnson PC;;
Vol. 102 , No. 2 , pp. -
432 views Abstract
1998
Famciclovir for the suppression of symptomatic and asymptomatic herpes simplex virus reactivation in HIV-infected persons. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
Schacker T;Hu HL;Koelle DM;Zeh J;Saltzman R;Boon R;Shaughnessy M;Barnum G;Corey L;;
Vol. 128 , No. 1 , pp. -
429 views Abstract
2019
The Cost-Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Versus Second-Generation Antidepressants for Initial Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in the United States: A Decision Analytic Model.
Ross, Eric L;Vijan, Sandeep;Miller, Erin M;Valenstein, Marcia;Zivin, Kara;
426 views DOI Abstract
2012
The cost-effectiveness of birth-cohort screening for hepatitis C antibody in U.S. primary care settings
Rein DB;Smith BD;Wittenborn JS;Lesesne SB;Wagner LD;Roblin DW;Patel N;Ward JW;Weinbaum CM;;
Vol. 156 , No. 4 , pp. -
416 views Abstract
2016
Elbasvir-Grazoprevir to Treat Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Persons Receiving Opioid Agonist Therapy: A Randomized Trial
Dore GJ;Altice F;Litwin AH;Dalgard O;Gane EJ;Shibolet O;Luetkemeyer A;Nahass R;Peng CY;Conway B;Grebely J;Howe AY;Gendrano IN;Chen E;Huang HC;Dutko FJ;Nickle DC;Nguyen BY;Wahl J;Barr E;Robertson MN;Platt HL; ;;
Vol. 165 , No. 9 , pp. -
415 views Abstract
2003
Standardized reporting of clinical practice guidelines: a proposal from the Conference on Guideline Standardization
Shiffman RN;Shekelle P;Overhage JM;Slutsky J;Grimshaw J;Deshpande AM;;
Vol. 139 , No. 6 , pp. -
407 views Abstract
1999
Reversal of iron deficiency anemia after Helicobacter pylori eradication in patients with asymptomatic gastritis
Annibale B;Marignani M;Monarca B;Antonelli G;Marcheggiano A;Martino G;Mandelli F;Caprilli R;Delle Fave G;;
Vol. 131 , No. 9 , pp. -
406 views Abstract
View All 61 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.