Indexed in Journament

saudi journal of anaesthesia

ISSN 1658-354X· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,789 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
56 Articles
Scores higher than 12.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name saudi j anaesth
Abbreviated Name saudi j anaesth
ISSN 1658-354X
URL http://saudija.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 10.7 13.4
Content Distribution 62.2 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (56)

2012
The evaluation of efficacy and safety of paravertebral block for perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Agarwal, Anil;Batra, Ravinder K;Chhabra, Anjolie;Subramaniam, Rajeshwari;Misra, Mahesh C;
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 344-349
619 views Abstract
2016
Enhancing needle visualization during parasagittal approach in paravertebral block for patients undergoing simple mastectomy using in-plane, multiangle ultrasound needle guidance system
Mansour, M A;Sonbaty, ME;
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 33-37
524 views Abstract
2018
USG-guided continuous erector spinae block as a primary mode of perioperative analgesia in open posterolateral thoracotomy: A report of two cases
Nath, Sayan;Bhoi, Debesh;Mohan, Virender Kumar;Talawar, Praveen;
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. 471-474
485 views Abstract
2015
risk of obstructive sleep apnea among saudis with chronic renal failure on hemodialysis
;Siraj Omar Wali;Abeer Alkhouli;Mohannad Howladar;Ibrahim Ahmad;Saad Alshohaib;Saeed Al-Ghamdi;Ayman Krayem
Vol. 10 , No. 4 , pp. 263-268
465 views DOI Abstract
2016
bacterial colonization and associated factors in patients with bronchiectasis
;Sermin Borekci;Ayse Nigar Halis;Gokhan Aygun;Benan Musellim
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 55-59
459 views DOI Abstract
Cost drain of anesthesia emergency drugs in a quaternary care hospital.
Majeed, Amer;Firdous, Attyia;AlBabtain, Hesham;Iqbal, Tahir;
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. 203-207
420 views DOI Abstract
2015
the effect of sand storms on acute asthma in riyadh, saudi arabia
;Abdullah A Alangari;Muhammad Riaz;Mohamed Osman Mahjoub;Nidal Malhis;Saleh Al-Tamimi;Abdullah Al-Modaihsh
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 29-33
409 views DOI Abstract
2017
factors determining altered perfusion after acute pulmonary embolism assessed by quantified single-photon emission computed tomography-perfusion scan
;Marc Meysman;Hendrik Everaert;Walter Vincken
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 30-35
398 views DOI Abstract
Initial experience of erector spinae plane block in patients undergoing breast surgery: A case series.
Talawar, Praveen;Kumar, Ajeet;Bhoi, Debesh;Singh, Akhil;
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 72-74
386 views DOI Abstract
2018
Comparative evaluation of analgesic sparing efficacy between dexmedetomidine and clonidine used as adjuvant to ropivacaine in thoracic paravertebral block for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study
Mukherjee, A.
Vol. 12 , pp. 548-554
372 views DOI
2019
Retraction: Digital assistance of nasogastric tube insertion in intubated patients under general anesthesia: A single-blinded prospective randomized study (Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia (2017) 11 (283-286) DOI: 10.4103/sja.SJA_524_16)
not, found
Vol. 13 , pp. 174
203 views DOI
2019
Writing the title and abstract for a research paper: Being concise, precise, and meticulous is the key
Tullu, M.
Vol. 13 , pp. S12-S17
295 views DOI
2018
author reply
;Grigoris K Stratakos;Abdelfattah A Touman
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 123-123
193 views DOI
2018
admission predictability of children with acute asthma
;Maan Alherbish;Khalid F Mobaireek;Abdullah A Alangari
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 36-41
243 views DOI Abstract
2018
USG-guided continuous erector spinae block as a primary mode of perioperative analgesia in open posterolateral thoracotomy: A report of two cases
Nath, Sayan;Bhoi, Debesh;Mohan, Virender Kumar;Talawar, Praveen;
Vol. 12 , No. 3 , pp. 471-474
485 views Abstract
2018
Comparative evaluation of analgesic sparing efficacy between dexmedetomidine and clonidine used as adjuvant to ropivacaine in thoracic paravertebral block for patients undergoing breast cancer surgery: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study
Mukherjee, A.
Vol. 12 , pp. 548-554
372 views DOI
2018
Appearance of Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome as research question in the title of articles of three different anesthesia journals: A pilot study
Eldawlatly, A.
Vol. 12 , pp. 283-286
361 views DOI
2017
anomalous systemic arterial supply of pulmonary sequestration in adult patients
;Xiaomeng Hou;Ji Li;Jing Li;Baiqiang Cai
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 46-50
122 views DOI Abstract
2017
factors determining altered perfusion after acute pulmonary embolism assessed by quantified single-photon emission computed tomography-perfusion scan
;Marc Meysman;Hendrik Everaert;Walter Vincken
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 30-35
398 views DOI Abstract
2016
are there radiographic, metabolic, and prognostic differences between cavitary and noncavitary nonsmall cell lung carcinoma? a retrospective fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography study
;Nghi C Nguyen;Kumar Abhishek;Samuel Nyon;Hussein Rabie S Farghaly;Medhat M Osman;Hans-Joachim Reimers
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 49-54
262 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
28.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,789 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

28.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

62.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.