Indexed in Journament

journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy

ISSN 2376-1032· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #8,592 of 29,297 scored journals (34,014 indexed)
40 Articles
Scores higher than 70.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j manag care spec pharm
Abbreviated Name j manag care spec pharm
ISSN 2376-1032
URL http://www.jmcp.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 37.0 22.3
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 7.1 4.1
Content Distribution 73.3 88.9
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (40)

2019
Quantification of Economic Impact of Drug Wastage in Oral Oncology Medications: Comparison of 3 Methods Using Palbociclib and Ribociclib in Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Biskupiak, Joseph;Oderda, Gary;Brixner, Diana;Tang, Derek;Zacker, Christopher;Dalal, Anand A;
Vol. 25 , No. 8 , pp. 859-866
461 views DOI Abstract
2019
Implications of Removing Rosiglitazone's Black Box Warning and Restricted Access Program on the Uptake of Thiazolidinediones and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
Hickson, Ryan P;Cole, Ashley L;Dusetzina, Stacie B;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 72-79
440 views DOI Abstract
2020
Assessing Health Care Burden in Glaucoma Patients with and Without Physical or Mental Comorbidities.
Serbin, Michael;Devine, Beth;Campbell, Joanna;Basu, Anirban;
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 325-331
432 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Influence of Allowable Refill Gaps on Detecting Long-Term Opioid Therapy: An Analysis of Population-Based Administrative Dispensing Data Among Patients with Knee Arthritis Awaiting Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Goplen, C Michael;Randall, Jason R;Kang, Sung Hyun;Vakilian, Fatemeh;Jones, C Allyson;Voaklander, Donald C;Beaupre, Lauren A;
Vol. 25 , No. 10 , pp. 1064-1072
430 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing the Effect of a Telepharmacist's Recommendations During an Integrated, Interprofessional Telehealth Appointment and Their Alignment with Quality Measures.
Tetuan, Christa;Axon, David Rhys;Bingham, Jennifer;Boesen, Kevin;Lipsy, Robert;Scovis, Nicole;Taylor, Ann M;Warholak, Terri;Lott, Breanne E;Leal, Sandra;
Vol. 25 , No. 12 , pp. 1334-1339
410 views DOI Abstract
2020
Changes in Concurrent Opioid and Benzodiazepine Use Following a Low-Touch Prescriber Fax Intervention.
Yang, Rochelle;Carruth, Sara E;Qiu, Wenyi Amanda;Leslie, R Scott;
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 160-167
394 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor on Pulmonary Exacerbation Rates in Members with Cystic Fibrosis in a Medicaid Population.
Tesell, Mark A;Alper, Caroline J;Bacon, Rachel;Greenwood, Bonnie C;Lenz, Kimberly;Jeffrey, Paul L;Stevens, Karen;
Vol. 25 , No. 9 , pp. 1021-1025
393 views DOI Abstract
2020
Financial Sustainability of an Oregon Rural Health, Primary Care, and Pharmacist-Run Comprehensive Medication Management Program Through Direct Medical Billing.
Hoover, Nathan D;Turner, R Brigg;Sampson, Jaime;Pye, Tiffanie;Hotan, Tanie;
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 30-34
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
Accuracy of Prescription Claims Data in Identifying Truly Nonadherent Patients.
Glassberg, Mrudula B;Trygstad, Troy;Wei, David;Robinson, Tamika;Farley, Joel F;
Vol. 25 , No. 12 , pp. 1349-1356
375 views DOI Abstract
2020
Examining Misaligned Incentives for Payers and Manufacturers in Value-Based Pharmaceutical Contracts.
Kannarkat, Joseph T;Good, Chester B;Kelly, Erin;Parekh, Natasha;
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 63-66
368 views DOI Abstract
2020
Assessing Health Care Burden in Glaucoma Patients with and Without Physical or Mental Comorbidities.
Serbin, Michael;Devine, Beth;Campbell, Joanna;Basu, Anirban;
Vol. 26 , No. 3 , pp. 325-331
432 views DOI Abstract
2020
Changes in Concurrent Opioid and Benzodiazepine Use Following a Low-Touch Prescriber Fax Intervention.
Yang, Rochelle;Carruth, Sara E;Qiu, Wenyi Amanda;Leslie, R Scott;
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 160-167
394 views DOI Abstract
2020
Examining Misaligned Incentives for Payers and Manufacturers in Value-Based Pharmaceutical Contracts.
Kannarkat, Joseph T;Good, Chester B;Kelly, Erin;Parekh, Natasha;
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 63-66
368 views DOI Abstract
2020
Financial Sustainability of an Oregon Rural Health, Primary Care, and Pharmacist-Run Comprehensive Medication Management Program Through Direct Medical Billing.
Hoover, Nathan D;Turner, R Brigg;Sampson, Jaime;Pye, Tiffanie;Hotan, Tanie;
Vol. 26 , No. 1 , pp. 30-34
392 views DOI Abstract
2019
Accuracy of Prescription Claims Data in Identifying Truly Nonadherent Patients.
Glassberg, Mrudula B;Trygstad, Troy;Wei, David;Robinson, Tamika;Farley, Joel F;
Vol. 25 , No. 12 , pp. 1349-1356
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessing the Effect of a Telepharmacist's Recommendations During an Integrated, Interprofessional Telehealth Appointment and Their Alignment with Quality Measures.
Tetuan, Christa;Axon, David Rhys;Bingham, Jennifer;Boesen, Kevin;Lipsy, Robert;Scovis, Nicole;Taylor, Ann M;Warholak, Terri;Lott, Breanne E;Leal, Sandra;
Vol. 25 , No. 12 , pp. 1334-1339
410 views DOI Abstract
2019
Predictors of Annual Base Salary for Health Economics, Outcomes Research, and Market Access Professionals in the Biopharmaceutical Industry.
Ghosh, Somraj;Rascati, Karen L;Shah, Ankit;Peeples, Patti;
Vol. 25 , No. 12 , pp. 1328-1333
324 views DOI Abstract
2019
Implications of Removing Rosiglitazone's Black Box Warning and Restricted Access Program on the Uptake of Thiazolidinediones and Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
Hickson, Ryan P;Cole, Ashley L;Dusetzina, Stacie B;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 72-79
440 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of V-Go Versus Multiple Daily Injections on Glycemic Control, Insulin Use, and Diabetes Medication Costs Among Individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
Raval, Amit D;Nguyen, Matthew H;Zhou, Siting;Grabner, Michael;Barron, John;Quimbo, Ralph;
Vol. 25 , No. 10 , pp. 1111-1123
290 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Comprehensive Review of Methods to Measure Oral Oncolytic Dose Intensity Using Retrospective Data.
Slejko, Julia F;Rueda, Juan-David;Trovato, James A;Gorman, Emily F;Betz, Gail;Arcona, Stephen;Zacker, Christopher;Stuart, Bruce;
Vol. 25 , No. 10 , pp. 1125-1132
244 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
35.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #8,592 of 29,297 scored
(34,014 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

37.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.