Indexed in Journament

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America

ISSN 1537-6591· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
47.7 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #311 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
578 Articles
Scores higher than 98.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Clin Infect Dis
Abbreviated Name clin infect dis
ISSN 1537-6591
URL https://academic.oup.com/cid
Author Instructions https://academic.oup.com/cid/pages/General_Instructions

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 30.0 23.1
Timeliness 100.0 3.0
Diversity 72.2 25.8
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 7.9 4.2
Content Distribution 19.7 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (578)

2016
Impact and Effectiveness of Monovalent Rotavirus Vaccine Against Severe Rotavirus Diarrhea in Ghana
Vol. 62 Suppl 2 , pp. -
873 views Abstract
2007
Antibiotic prophylaxis and the risk of surgical site infections following total hip arthroplasty: timely administration is the most important factor
Vol. 44 , No. 7 , pp. -
729 views Abstract
1997
1997 guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with unexplained fever. Infectious Diseases Society of America
Vol. 25 , No. 3 , pp. -
719 views Abstract
2011
Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america
Vol. 52 , No. 4 , pp. -
673 views Abstract
2003
Evaluation of the immunochromatographic Binax NOW assay for detection of Streptococcus pneumoniae urinary antigen in a prospective study of community-acquired pneumonia in Spain
Vol. 36 , No. 3 , pp. -
673 views Abstract
2004
Community-based surveillance in the united states of macrolide-resistant pediatric pharyngeal group A streptococci during 3 respiratory disease seasons
Vol. 39 , No. 12 , pp. -
634 views Abstract
2009
A cluster of ecthyma outbreaks caused by a single clone of invasive and highly infective Streptococcus pyogenes
Vol. 48 , No. 9 , pp. -
615 views Abstract
2003
Hospital transmission of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among postpartum women
Vol. 37 , No. 10 , pp. -
615 views Abstract
2016
Use of Patients With Diarrhea Who Test Negative for Rotavirus as Controls to Estimate Rotavirus Vaccine Effectiveness Through Case-Control Studies
Vol. 62 Suppl 2 , pp. -
606 views Abstract
2026
Effectiveness of timely hepatitis B birth dose vaccination to prevent mother-to-child transmission in Ethiopia
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
Gender Differences in Hepatitis C Care Outcomes in the New York City Jail System, 2019–2023: A Retrospective Cohort Study
8 views DOI Abstract
2026
Safety of tuberculosis preventive treatment among people receiving or about to initiate immunosuppressive medications: a systematic review and meta-analysis
6 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
47.7/100 · Below Average
Ranked #311 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

47.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

30.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

72.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

19.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.