pastoralism | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5274 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

pastoralism

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name pastoralism
Abbreviated Name pastoralism
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (25 total)

2019
Indigenous weather and climate forecasting knowledge among Afar pastoralists of north eastern Ethiopia: Role in adaptation to weather and climate variability
Balehegn, Mulubrhan;Balehey, Selam;Fu, Chao;Liang, Wu;
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 1-14
708 views Abstract
2018
Patterns of passage into protected areas: Drivers and outcomes of Fulani immigration, settlement and integration into the Kachia Grazing Reserve, northwest Nigeria
Ducrotoy, Marie J.;Majekodunmi, Ayodele O.;Shaw, Alexandra P. M.;Bagulo, Husein;Bertu, Wilson J.;Gusi, Amahyel M.;Ocholi, Reuben;Welburn, Susan C.;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 1-16
626 views Abstract
2017
Socio-economic determinants of pastoralists’ choice of camel production in Karamoja sub-region, Uganda
Salamula, Jenipher Biira;Egeru, Anthony;Asiimwe, Robert;Aleper, Daniel Knox;Namaalwa, Justine Jjumba;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
562 views Abstract
2018
Borana women’s indigenous social network-marro in building household food security: Case study from Ethiopia
Anbacha, Abiyot Eliyas;Kjosavik, Darley Jose;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 1-12
451 views Abstract
2017
Camel health management and pastoralists’ knowledge and information on zoonoses and food safety risks in Isiolo County, Kenya
Lamuka, Peter Obimbo;Njeruh, Francis M.;Gitao, George C.;Abey, Khalif A.;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 1-10
379 views Abstract
2019
Livestock depredation by snow leopard and Tibetan wolf: Implications for herders’ livelihoods in Wangchuck Centennial National Park, Bhutan
Jamtsho, Y.
Vol. 9 , pp. 0-0
332 views DOI
2018
Perceived effects of transhumant practices on natural resource management in southern Mali
Umutoni, Clarisse;Ayantunde, Augustine Abioye;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 1-14
315 views Abstract
2017
Review of ‘The Governance of Rangelands’ edited by Pedro M Herrera, Jonathan Davies and Pablo Manzano Baena
Bedelian, Claire;
Vol. 7 , No. 1 , pp. 1-3
293 views Abstract
2014
a measurement-specific quality-of-life satisfaction during premenopause, perimenopause and postmenopause in arabian qatari women
;Abdulbari Bener;Anas Falah
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 126-134
282 views DOI Abstract
2017
socioeconomic and reproductive determinants of waist-hip ratio index in menopausal women
;Zahra Rastegari;Mahnaz Noroozi;Zamzam Paknahad
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 170-173
276 views DOI Abstract
View All 25 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.