Indexed in Journament

proceedings - 2018 prognostics and system health management conference, phm-chongqing 2018

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #13,924 of 33,995 indexed journals
20 Articles
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name proceedings - 2018 prognostics and system health management conference, phm-chongqing 2018
Abbreviated Name proceedings - 2018 prognostics and system health management conference, phm-chongqing 2018

Publications Per Year

Articles (20)

2010
bioassay using daphnia magna straus, 1820 to evaluate the sediment of caí river (rio grande do sul, brazil) bioensaios utilizando daphnia magna straus, 1820 na avaliação do sedimento do rio caí (rio grande do sul, brasil)
Vol. 22 , No. 4 , pp. 442-454
452 views DOI Abstract
2011
influence of urbanisation on water quality in the basin of the upper uruguay river in western santa catarina, brazil influência da urbanização sobre a qualidade da água na bacia do alto rio uruguai no oeste de santa catarina, brasil
Vol. 23 , No. 2 , pp. 189-199
325 views DOI Abstract
seasonal and spatial variation of the epilithic diatoms: case study of an organic pollution gradient in a subtropical region of southern brazil
Vol. 29 , pp. -
318 views DOI Abstract
2011
focusing on variation: methods and applications of the concept of beta diversity in aquatic ecosystems focando na variação: métodos e aplicações do conceito de diversidade beta em ecossistemas aquáticos
Vol. 23 , No. 3 , pp. 318-331
278 views Abstract
2015
spatial modeling of limnological parameters in a solar saltwork of northeastern brazil
Vol. 27 , No. 1 , pp. 105-117
208 views DOI Abstract
2015
effects of nutrients increase on the copepod community of a reservoir using cages
Vol. 27 , No. 3 , pp. 265-274
117 views DOI Abstract
2015
daily mass balance of phosphorus and nitrogen in effluents of production sectors of trout farming system
Vol. 27 , No. 3 , pp. 330-340
197 views DOI Abstract
2014
composition and diversity of the chironomidae in subtropical streams: effects of environmental predictors and temporal analysis
Vol. 26 , No. 2 , pp. 215-226
18 views DOI Abstract
2013
spatial and temporal patterns of macroinvertebrates in drift and on substrate of a mountain stream (cordoba, central argentina)
Vol. 25 , No. 4 , pp. 375-386
200 views DOI Abstract
2013
how many species of cladocerans (crustacea, branchiopoda) are found in brazilian federal district?
Vol. 24 , No. 4 , pp. 351-362
220 views DOI Abstract
2013
piscivory by hoplias aff. malabaricus (bloch, 1794): a question of prey availability?
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 68-78
36 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #13,924 of 33,995
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

37.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

65.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.