Indexed in Journament

critical care medicine

ISSN 1530-0293· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,631 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
29 Articles
Scores higher than 87.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name crit care med
Abbreviated Name critical care medicine
ISSN 1530-0293
URL http://www.ccmjournal.com

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 61.1 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 8.6 5.8
Content Distribution 68.9 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (29)

2012
Survival in neutropenic patients with severe sepsis or septic shock
Legrand M;Max A;Peigne V;Mariotte E;Canet E;Debrumetz A;Lemiale V;Seguin A;Darmon M;Schlemmer B;Azoulay E;;
Vol. 40 , No. 1 , pp. -
619 views Abstract
2006
Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock
Kumar A;Roberts D;Wood KE;Light B;Parrillo JE;Sharma S;Suppes R;Feinstein D;Zanotti S;Taiberg L;Gurka D;Kumar A;Cheang M;;
Vol. 34 , No. 6 , pp. -
585 views Abstract
2020
Simulation-Based Team Leadership Training Improves Team Leadership During Actual Trauma Resuscitations: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Fernandez, Rosemarie;Rosenman, Elizabeth D;Olenick, Jeffrey;Misisco, Anthony;Brolliar, Sarah M;Chipman, Anne K;Vrablik, Marie C;Kalynych, Colleen;Arbabi, Saman;Nichol, Graham;Grand, James;Kozlowski, Steve W J;Chao, Georgia T;
Vol. 48 , No. 1 , pp. 73-82
523 views DOI Abstract
2016
The Use of Ferritin to Identify Critically Ill Patients With Secondary Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis
Grangé S;Buchonnet G;Besnier E;Artaud-Macari E;Beduneau G;Carpentier D;Dehay J;Girault C;Marchalot A;Guerrot D;Tamion F;;
Vol. 44 , No. 11 , pp. -
495 views Abstract
2019
Airway Pressure Release Ventilation in Adult Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Lim, Jolene;Litton, Edward;
487 views DOI Abstract
1994
Aerosolized ribavirin in mechanically ventilated children with respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract disease: a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial
Meert KL;Sarnaik AP;Gelmini MJ;Lieh-Lai MW;;
Vol. 22 , No. 4 , pp. -
470 views Abstract
2019
Circuit Hemodynamics and Circuit Failure During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.
Sansom, Benjamin;Sriram, Shyamala;Presneill, Jeffrey;Bellomo, Rinaldo;
425 views DOI Abstract
2019
Perceptions of Ethical Decision-Making Climate Among Clinicians Working in European and U.S. ICUs: Differences Between Nurses and Physicians.
Jensen, Hanne Irene;Hebsgaard, Stine;Hansen, Tina Charlotte Bitsch;Johnsen, Rikke Frank Aagaard;Hartog, Christiane S;Soultati, Ioanna;Szucs, Orsolya;Wilson, Michael E;van den Bulcke, Bo;Benoit, Dominique D;Piers, Ruth;
423 views DOI Abstract
2018
Molecular Regulation of Acute Tie2 Suppression in Sepsis.
Thamm, Kristina;Schrimpf, Claudia;Retzlaff, Jennifer;Idowu, Temitayo O;van Meurs, Matijs;Zijlstra, Jan G;Ghosh, Chandra C;Zeitvogel, Jana;Werfel, Thomas A;Haller, Hermann;Parikh, Samir M;David, Sascha;
Vol. 46 , No. 9 , pp. e928-e936
401 views DOI Abstract
2001
Cardiac variability in critically ill adults: influence of sepsis
Korach M;Sharshar T;Jarrin I;Fouillot JP;Raphaël JC;Gajdos P;Annane D;;
Vol. 29 , No. 7 , pp. -
391 views Abstract
2020
Early Prediction of Sepsis From Clinical Data Using Ratio and Power-Based Features.
Nesaragi, Naimahmed;Patidar, Shivnarayan;
300 views DOI Abstract
2020
Simulation-Based Team Leadership Training Improves Team Leadership During Actual Trauma Resuscitations: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Fernandez, Rosemarie;Rosenman, Elizabeth D;Olenick, Jeffrey;Misisco, Anthony;Brolliar, Sarah M;Chipman, Anne K;Vrablik, Marie C;Kalynych, Colleen;Arbabi, Saman;Nichol, Graham;Grand, James;Kozlowski, Steve W J;Chao, Georgia T;
Vol. 48 , No. 1 , pp. 73-82
523 views DOI Abstract
2019
Targeting CD39 Toward Activated Platelets Reduces Systemic Inflammation and Improves Survival in Sepsis: A Preclinical Pilot Study
Granja, T.
Vol. 47 , pp. e420-e427
316 views DOI
2019
Perceptions of Ethical Decision-Making Climate Among Clinicians Working in European and U.S. ICUs: Differences Between Nurses and Physicians.
Jensen, Hanne Irene;Hebsgaard, Stine;Hansen, Tina Charlotte Bitsch;Johnsen, Rikke Frank Aagaard;Hartog, Christiane S;Soultati, Ioanna;Szucs, Orsolya;Wilson, Michael E;van den Bulcke, Bo;Benoit, Dominique D;Piers, Ruth;
423 views DOI Abstract
2019
Circuit Hemodynamics and Circuit Failure During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.
Sansom, Benjamin;Sriram, Shyamala;Presneill, Jeffrey;Bellomo, Rinaldo;
425 views DOI Abstract
2019
Airway Pressure Release Ventilation in Adult Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Lim, Jolene;Litton, Edward;
487 views DOI Abstract
2019
Nonpharmacologic Interventions to Prevent or Mitigate Adverse Long-Term Outcomes Among ICU Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Geense, Wytske W;van den Boogaard, Mark;van der Hoeven, Johannes G;Vermeulen, Hester;Hannink, Gerjon;Zegers, Marieke;
233 views DOI Abstract
2019
In Search of Answers and Technology to Better Identify the Bleeding and the Hypercoagulable Patient Phenotype-The Need for Improved Assessment of Deranged Coagulation Beyond Our Current Coagulation Tests
Frendl, G.
Vol. 47 , pp. 876-877
386 views DOI
2018
Predictors of Intubation in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure Treated With a Noninvasive Oxygenation Strategy
Frat JP;Ragot S;Coudroy R;Constantin JM;Girault C;Prat G;Boulain T;Demoule A;Ricard JD;Razazi K;Lascarrou JB;Devaquet J;Mira JP;Argaud L;Chakarian JC;Fartoukh M;Nseir S;Mercat A;Brochard L;Robert R;Thille AW; ;;
Vol. 46 , No. 2 , pp. -
322 views Abstract
2018
Molecular Regulation of Acute Tie2 Suppression in Sepsis.
Thamm, Kristina;Schrimpf, Claudia;Retzlaff, Jennifer;Idowu, Temitayo O;van Meurs, Matijs;Zijlstra, Jan G;Ghosh, Chandra C;Zeitvogel, Jana;Werfel, Thomas A;Haller, Hermann;Parikh, Samir M;David, Sascha;
Vol. 46 , No. 9 , pp. e928-e936
401 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,631 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

61.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

68.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.