translational behavioral medicine | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1528 / 33,939
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

translational behavioral medicine

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name transl behav med
Abbreviated Name transl behav med
ISSN 1613-9860
Aim and Scope
URL https://academic.oup.com/tbm
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (52 total)

2018
porphyria cutanea tarda (pct) experience in victoria, australia: a case series and literature review
;Quynh Le;Robert Fullinfaw ;Myra McGuinnes ;Gayle Ross
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 54-63
582 views DOI Abstract
2019
Implementation of a Meaning-Centered Psychotherapy training (MCPT) program for oncology clinicians: a qualitative analysis of facilitators and barriers.
Polacek, Laura C;Reisch, Sally;Saracino, Rebecca M;Pessin, Hayley;Breitbart, William;
456 views DOI Abstract
2019
The impact of mobile applications on medication adherence: a systematic review.
Ng, Ricki;Carter, Stephen R;El-Den, Sarira;
450 views DOI Abstract
2019
The SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework: demonstrating the impact of a national framework for obesity prevention in low-income populations.
Naja-Riese, Andy;Keller, Kimberly J M;Bruno, Pamela;Foerster, Susan B;Puma, Jini;Whetstone, Lauren;MkNelly, Barbara;Cullinen, Kathleen;Jacobs, Laurel;Sugerman, Sharon;
Vol. 9 , No. 5 , pp. 970-979
425 views DOI Abstract
2017
socio-economic and socio-demographic determinants of bnp values in children with pneumonia in benin city
;Wilson Osa Osarogiagbon;Wilson Ehi Sadoh
Vol. 10 , No. 5 , pp. 432-438
414 views DOI Abstract
2013
Healthy eating for life: rationale and development of an English as a second language (ESL) curriculum for promoting healthy nutrition.
Martinez, Josefa L;Rivers, Susan E;Duncan, Lindsay R;Bertoli, Michelle;Domingo, Samantha;Latimer-Cheung, Amy E;Salovey, Peter;
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 426-33
405 views DOI Abstract
2019
Development and evaluation of the SPeeding Research-tested INTerventions (SPRINT) training program.
Gaysynsky, Anna;Vinson, Cynthia A;Oh, April;
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
Is there a trial bias impacting user engagement with unguided e-mental health interventions? A systematic comparison of published reports and real-world usage of the same programs.
Baumel, Amit;Edan, Stav;Kane, John M;
Vol. 9 , No. 6 , pp. 1020-1033
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
Community eligibility and other provisions for universal free meals at school: impact on student breakfast and lunch participation in California public schools.
Turner, Lindsey;Guthrie, Joanne F;Ralston, Katherine;
Vol. 9 , No. 5 , pp. 931-941
373 views DOI Abstract
2019
The role of food gateways at increasing access to alternative retail food outlets.
Paré, Elizabeth R;Body, Katherine;Gilstorf, Sarah;Lucarelli, Jennifer;
Vol. 9 , No. 5 , pp. 884-887
360 views DOI Abstract
View All 52 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.