Indexed in Journament

revista panamericana de salud publica = pan american journal of public health

ISSN 1680-5348· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,898 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
34 Articles
Scores higher than 11.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name rev panam salud publica
Abbreviated Name rev panam salud publica
ISSN 1680-5348
URL http://www.paho.org/journal

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for revista panamericana de salud publica = pan american journal of public health
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 13.6 13.4
Content Distribution 58.6 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (34)

[Spending and financing in health care: situation and trends].
Vol. 8 , No. 1-2 , pp. 71-83
476 views Abstract
2018
[Fiscal space for sustainable financing of health systems and universal healthEspaço fiscal para o financiamento sustentável dos sistemas de saúde e saúde universal].
Vol. 42 , pp. e197
461 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Primary health care in disaster situations: systematic reviewAtención primaria de salud en situaciones de desastre: revisión sistemática].
Vol. 43 , pp. e76
431 views DOI Abstract
2018
Involving the public in health research in Latin America: making the case for mental health.
Vol. 42 , pp. e45
427 views DOI Abstract
2016
Mapping of nutrition and sectoral policies addressing malnutrition in Latin America.
Vol. 40 , No. 2 , pp. 114-123
423 views DOI Abstract
2018
A critical appraisal of the harm reduction argument for heat-not-burn tobacco products.
Vol. 42 , pp. e161
418 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Prevalence of comorbidity tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus in Paraguay, 2016 and 2017Prevalência de comorbidade tuberculose-diabetes mellitus no Paraguai, 2016 e 2017].
Vol. 43 , pp. e105
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Loss to follow-up in patients treated for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in EcuadorA Perda de seguimento de pacientes tratados para tuberculose multirresistente a medicamentos no Equador].
Vol. 43 , pp. e91
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Factors associated with tuberculosis mortality in Paraguay, 2015-2016Fatores associados à mortalidade por tuberculose no Paraguai, 2015-2016].
Vol. 43 , pp. e102
360 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Prevalence of comorbidity tuberculosis and diabetes mellitus in Paraguay, 2016 and 2017Prevalência de comorbidade tuberculose-diabetes mellitus no Paraguai, 2016 e 2017].
Vol. 43 , pp. e105
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
Fiscal space for Health in the Americas: is economic growth sufficient?
Vol. 43 , pp. e321
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Primary health care in disaster situations: systematic reviewAtención primaria de salud en situaciones de desastre: revisión sistemática].
Vol. 43 , pp. e76
431 views DOI Abstract
2019
[Control and management strategies in multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: literature reviewEstrategias de control y atención de la tuberculosis multirresistente: una revisión de la literatura].
Vol. 43 , pp. e20
261 views DOI Abstract
2018
Involving the public in health research in Latin America: making the case for mental health.
Vol. 42 , pp. e45
427 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
28.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,898 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

28.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

13.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

58.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.