American Journal of Clinical Pathology | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1776 / 33,955
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
65
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

American Journal of Clinical Pathology

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name American Journal of Clinical Pathology
Abbreviated Name am j clin pathol
ISSN 1943-7722
Aim and Scope
URL https://academic.oup.com/ajcp
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (68 total)

1998
Ambiguity in the identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Optochin, bile solubility, quellung, and the AccuProbe DNA probe tests
Mundy LS;Janoff EN;Schwebke KE;Shanholtzer CJ;Willard KE;;
Vol. 109 , No. 1 , pp. -
417 views Abstract
2020
Safety Considerations in the Laboratory Testing of Specimens Suspected or Known to Contain the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2).
Iwen, Peter C;Stiles, Karen L;Pentella, Michael A;
358 views DOI
2018
Malpractice Concerns, Defensive Medicine, and the Histopathology Diagnosis of Melanocytic Skin Lesions.
Titus, Linda J;Reisch, Lisa M;Tosteson, Anna N A;Nelson, Heidi D;Frederick, Paul D;Carney, Patricia A;Barnhill, Raymond L;Elder, David E;Weinstock, Martin A;Piepkorn, Michael W;Elmore, Joann G;
Vol. 150 , No. 4 , pp. 338-345
312 views DOI Abstract
2019
Assessment of The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology.
Sauter, Jennifer L;Lehrke, Heidi;Zhang, Xiaotun;Al Badri, Osamah T;Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Rene;Delivanis, Danae A;Singh Ospina, Naykky;Donegan, Diane;Hamidi, Oksana;Iñiguez-Ariza, Nicole;Sharma, Anu;Kittah, Nana Esi N;Tamhane, Shrikant U;Hurtado Andrade, Maria D;Kotwal, Anupam;Jenkins, Sarah M;Spears, Grant;Rivera, Michael;Dean, Diana S;Henry, Michael R;
298 views DOI Abstract
1998
Ambiguity in the Identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae Optochin, Bile Solubility, Quellung, and the AccuProbe DNA Probe Tests
Mundy, Lesley S.;Janoff, Edward N.;Schwebke, Kay E.;Shanholtzer, Carol J.;Willard, Keith E.;
Vol. 109 , No. 1 , pp. 55-61
291 views Abstract
2020
Rapid Diagnosis of Tuberculosis Meningitis by Detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis Cell-Free DNA in Cerebrospinal Fluid
Li, X.
Vol. 153 , pp. 126-130
286 views DOI
2020
Concordance Between Rapid On-Site Evaluation and Final Cytologic Diagnosis in Patients Undergoing Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspiration for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Staging
Caupena, C.
Vol. 153 , pp. 190-197
286 views DOI
2020
The American Society for Clinical Pathology's Job Satisfaction, Well-Being, and Burnout Survey of Pathologists.
Garcia, Edna;Kundu, Iman;Kelly, Melissa;Soles, Ryan;Mulder, Lotte;Talmon, Geoffrey A;
Vol. 153 , pp. 435-448
273 views DOI Abstract
2012
spanish researchers’ perceived difficulty writing research articles for english-medium journals: the impact of proficiency in english versus publication experience
;Ana I. Moreno;Jesús Rey-Rocha;Sally Burgess;Irene López-Navarro;Itesh Sachdev
Vol. 24 , pp. 157-184
259 views Abstract
2019
Toward Improving Practices for Submission of Diagnostic Tissue Blocks for National Cancer Institute Clinical Trials.
Mccall, Shannon J;
254 views DOI
View All 68 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
35
65
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

65.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.