arya atherosclerosis | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4175 / 33,957
📉 Poor
Overall Score
36.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated hace 2 semanas

arya atherosclerosis

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexaciones
doaj
Nombre Corto arya atheroscler
Nombre Abreviado arya atherosclerosis
ISSN 0000-0000
Objetivo y Alcance
URL
Instrucciones para Autores

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (28 total)

2017
The prevalence of obesity among school-aged children and youth aged 6-18 years in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis study
Khazaei, Salman;Mohammadian-Hafshejani, Abdollah;Nooraliey, Parivash;Keshvari-Delavar, Mohammad;Ghafari, Mahin;Pourmoghaddas, Ali;Ayubi, Erfan;Mansori, Kamyar;Gholamaliee, Behzad;Sarrafzadegan, Nizal;
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 35-43
621 views Abstract
2015
High-cocoa polyphenol-rich chocolate improves blood pressure in patients with diabetes and hypertension
Rostami, Ali;Khalili, Mohammad;Haghighat, Neda;Eghtesadi, Shahryar;Shidfar, Farzad;Heidari, Iraj;Ebrahimpour-Koujan, Soraiya;Eghtesadi, Maryam;
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 21-29
348 views Abstract
2008
solid water phantom heat conduction: heating and cooling rates
;Butson Martin;Cheung Tsang;Yu Peter
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. 24-28
316 views Abstract
2017
a dosimetric study on slab-pinewood-slab phantom for developing the heterogeneous chest phantom mimicking actual human chest
;Om Prakash Gurjar;Radha Kishan Paliwal;Surendra Prasad Mishra
Vol. 42 , No. 2 , pp. 80-85
312 views DOI Abstract
2019
Sharing the power through promoting heart health literacy: A participatory action research in Iran.
Akbari, Mohammad;Mousavi, Masoumeh Sadat;Shirani, Farimah;Massoumi, Gholamreza;Shafeie, Mohammadreza;Niknejad, Reyhaneh;Khourasani, Parvaneh;Alavi, Mousa;Ghadami, Ahmad;
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. 146-151
298 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluation and performance of arccheck and film using gamma criteria in pre-treatment quality assurance of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy
;Prabhakar Ramachandran;Abdulrahman Tajaldeen;David Taylor;Derrick Wanigaratne;Karl Roozen;Moshi Geso
Vol. 42 , No. 4 , pp. 251-257
286 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluation of intensity modulated radiation therapy delivery system using a volumetric phantom on the basis of the task group 119 report of american association of physicists in medicine
;Raphaela Avgousti;Christina Armpilia;Ioannis Floros;Christos Antypas
Vol. 42 , No. 1 , pp. 33-41
283 views DOI Abstract
2014
a fast monte carlo code for proton transport in radiation therapy based on mcnpx
;Keyvan Jabbari;Jan Seuntjens
Vol. 39 , No. 3 , pp. 156-163
278 views DOI Abstract
2007
the role of mathematics on human structure: by swapan kumar adhikari
;Jayachandran C
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 77-78
274 views
2010
cyberknife: a new paradigm in radiotherapy
;Kurup Gopalakrishna
Vol. 35 , No. 2 , pp. 63-64
262 views
View All 28 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.