Indexed in Journament

arya atherosclerosis

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.8 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #18,481 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
28 Articles
Scores higher than 36.9% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name arya atheroscler
Abbreviated Name arya atherosclerosis
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.2
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 46.5
Community Impact 8.6
Content Distribution 55.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for arya atherosclerosis
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.2 30.4
Accessibility 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 22.7
Innovation 46.5 24.1
Community Impact 8.6 4.2
Content Distribution 55.6 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (28)

2017
The prevalence of obesity among school-aged children and youth aged 6-18 years in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis study
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 35-43
675 views Abstract
2015
High-cocoa polyphenol-rich chocolate improves blood pressure in patients with diabetes and hypertension
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 21-29
418 views Abstract
2008
solid water phantom heat conduction: heating and cooling rates
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. 24-28
354 views Abstract
2017
2017
a dosimetric study on slab-pinewood-slab phantom for developing the heterogeneous chest phantom mimicking actual human chest
Vol. 42 , No. 2 , pp. 80-85
350 views DOI Abstract
2019
Sharing the power through promoting heart health literacy: A participatory action research in Iran.
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. 146-151
337 views DOI Abstract
2014
a fast monte carlo code for proton transport in radiation therapy based on mcnpx
Vol. 39 , No. 3 , pp. 156-163
332 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluation and performance of arccheck and film using gamma criteria in pre-treatment quality assurance of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy
Vol. 42 , No. 4 , pp. 251-257
325 views DOI Abstract
2007
the role of mathematics on human structure: by swapan kumar adhikari
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 77-78
325 views
2015
inter-departmental dosimetry audits – development of methods and lessons learned
Vol. 40 , No. 4 , pp. 183-189
316 views DOI Abstract
2019
Sharing the power through promoting heart health literacy: A participatory action research in Iran.
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. 146-151
337 views DOI Abstract
2018
safety, security and regulations in handling radiation sources
Vol. 43 , No. 1 , pp. 66-68
129 views DOI
2017
a hybrid conformal planning technique with solitary dynamic portal for postmastectomy radiotherapy with regional nodes
Vol. 42 , No. 3 , pp. 116-122
171 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluation and performance of arccheck and film using gamma criteria in pre-treatment quality assurance of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy
Vol. 42 , No. 4 , pp. 251-257
325 views DOI Abstract
2017
2017
a dosimetric study on slab-pinewood-slab phantom for developing the heterogeneous chest phantom mimicking actual human chest
Vol. 42 , No. 2 , pp. 80-85
350 views DOI Abstract
2017
The prevalence of obesity among school-aged children and youth aged 6-18 years in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis study
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 35-43
675 views Abstract
2016
comparison of two programs in calculating electron output factors at extended source-surface distances
Vol. 41 , No. 1 , pp. 58-64
256 views DOI Abstract
2016
clinical implementation of an electron monitor unit dosimetry system based on task group 71 report and a commercial calculation program
Vol. 41 , No. 4 , pp. 214-218
262 views DOI Abstract
2016
surface dose measurements and comparison of unflattened and flattened photon beams
Vol. 41 , No. 2 , pp. 85-91
81 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
29.8/100 · Poor
Ranked #18,481 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

29.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

46.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

8.6/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

55.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.