international journal of copd | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4435 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.1/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

international journal of copd

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name international journal of copd
Abbreviated Name international journal of copd
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (26 total)

2014
Examining the relationship between anxiety and depression and exacerbations of COPD which result in hospital admission: a systematic review
A, Pooler;R, Beech;
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 315-330
520 views Abstract
2015
Comparison of exercise capacity in COPD and other etiologies of chronic respiratory failure requiring non-invasive mechanical ventilation at home: retrospective analysis of 1-year follow-up
C, Salturk;Z, Karakurt;HB, Takir;M, Balci;F, Kargin;OY, Mocin;G, Gungor;I, Ozmen;S, Oztas;M, Yalcinsoy;R, Evin;M, Ozturk;N, Adiguzel;
Vol. 2015 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 2559-2569
394 views Abstract
2018
Systematic analysis of transcriptomic profiles of COPD airway epithelium using next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics
WA, Chang;MJ, Tsai;SF, Jian;CC, Sheu;PL, Kuo;
Vol. Volume 13 , pp. 2387-2398
362 views Abstract
2017
Characteristics of COPD patients according to GOLD classification and clinical phenotypes in the Russian Federation: the SUPPORT trial
V, Arkhipov;D, Arkhipova;M, Miravitlles;A, Lazarev;E, Stukalina;
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 3255-3262
361 views Abstract
2016
Can patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory failure from COPD be treated safely with noninvasive mechanical ventilation on the ward?
M, Yalcinsoy;C, Salturk;S, Oztas;S, Gungor;I, Ozmen;F, Kabadayi;AA, Oztim;E, Aksoy;N, Adıguzel;O, Oruc;Z, Karakurt;
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 1151-1160
347 views Abstract
2009
The impact of SHS exposure on health status and exacerbations among patients with COPD
Eisner, Mark D;Iribarren, Carlos;Yelin, Edward H;Sidney, Stephen;al., et;
Vol. 2009 , No. default , pp. 169-176
342 views Abstract
2016
The utility of inflammatory markers to predict readmissions and mortality in COPD cases with or without eosinophilia [Corrigendum]
D, Duman;E, Aksoy;MC, Agca;ND, Kocak;I, Ozmen;UA, Akturk;S, Gungor;FM, Tepetam;SA, Eroglu;S, Oztas;Z, Karakurt;
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 417-418
341 views Abstract
2017
The immediate effect of soft tissue manual therapy intervention on lung function in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
C, Cruz-Montecinos;D, Godoy-Olave;FA, Contreras-Briceño;P, Gutiérrez;R, Torres-Castro;L, Miret-Venegas;RM, Engel;
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 691-696
336 views Abstract
2007
comprometimento e ética profissional: um estudo de suas relações juntos aos contabilistas commitment and professional ethics: a study of both amongst accouting professionals
;Erivan Borges;Carlos Medeiros
Vol. 18 , No. 44 , pp. 60-71
325 views DOI Abstract
2006
utilização da análise fatorial na identificação dos principais indicadores para avaliação do desempenho financeiro: uma aplicação nas empresas de seguros use of factor analysis to identify the main financial performance assessment indicators: an application in insurance companies
;Francisco Antonio Bezerra;Luiz J Corrar
Vol. 17 , No. 42 , pp. 50-62
294 views DOI Abstract
View All 26 Articles
35
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.