Indexed in Journament

international journal of copd

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
35.1/100
Journament Score
#10,318
Journament Rank
26
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name international journal of copd
Abbreviated Name international journal of copd
ISSN 0000-0000

Indexings

doaj

Publications Per Year

Articles (26)

2015
Comparison of exercise capacity in COPD and other etiologies of chronic respiratory failure requiring non-invasive mechanical ventilation at home: retrospective analysis of 1-year follow-up
Vol. 2015 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 2559-2569
408 views Abstract
2017
Characteristics of COPD patients according to GOLD classification and clinical phenotypes in the Russian Federation: the SUPPORT trial
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 3255-3262
388 views Abstract
2018
Systematic analysis of transcriptomic profiles of COPD airway epithelium using next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics
Vol. Volume 13 , pp. 2387-2398
380 views Abstract
2016
Can patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory failure from COPD be treated safely with noninvasive mechanical ventilation on the ward?
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 1151-1160
366 views Abstract
2009
The impact of SHS exposure on health status and exacerbations among patients with COPD
Vol. 2009 , No. default , pp. 169-176
355 views Abstract
2017
The immediate effect of soft tissue manual therapy intervention on lung function in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 691-696
350 views Abstract
2016
The utility of inflammatory markers to predict readmissions and mortality in COPD cases with or without eosinophilia [Corrigendum]
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 417-418
350 views Abstract
2018
Systematic analysis of transcriptomic profiles of COPD airway epithelium using next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics
Vol. Volume 13 , pp. 2387-2398
380 views Abstract
2017
The immediate effect of soft tissue manual therapy intervention on lung function in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 691-696
350 views Abstract
2017
Characteristics of COPD patients according to GOLD classification and clinical phenotypes in the Russian Federation: the SUPPORT trial
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 3255-3262
388 views Abstract
2016
the relevance of the informational content of book-tax differences for predicting future income: evidence from latin american countries
Vol. 27 , No. 70 , pp. 29-42
211 views DOI Abstract
2016
Can patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory failure from COPD be treated safely with noninvasive mechanical ventilation on the ward?
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 1151-1160
366 views Abstract
2016
The utility of inflammatory markers to predict readmissions and mortality in COPD cases with or without eosinophilia [Corrigendum]
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 417-418
350 views Abstract
2015
evitar divulgar perdas: um estudo empírico do gerenciamento de resultados por meio de decisões operacionais
Vol. 26 , No. 69 , pp. 247-260
91 views DOI Abstract
2015
presentation
Vol. 26 , No. 68 , pp. 119-120
119 views DOI
2015
determinantes da alfabetização financeira: análise da influência de variáveis socioeconômicas e demográficas
Vol. 26 , No. 69 , pp. 362-377
26 views DOI Abstract
2015
the term structure of interest rates and its impact on the liability adequacy test for insurance companies in brazil
Vol. 26 , No. 68 , pp. 223-236
22 views DOI Abstract
35
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

35.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.