Indexed in Journament

international journal of copd

ISSN 0000-0000· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #16,560 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
26 Articles
Scores higher than 43.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Nom Abrégé international journal of copd
Nom Abrégé international journal of copd
ISSN 0000-0000

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.9
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 69.0
Community Impact 12.1
Content Distribution 46.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.9 30.2
Accessibility — 17.8
Timeliness 0.0 15.9
Diversity — 28.3
Innovation 69.0 30.1
Community Impact 12.1 11.5
Content Distribution 46.5 88.5
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (26)

2014
Examining the relationship between anxiety and depression and exacerbations of COPD which result in hospital admission: a systematic review
A, Pooler;R, Beech;
Vol. 2014 , No. default , pp. 315-330
560 views Abstract
2015
Comparison of exercise capacity in COPD and other etiologies of chronic respiratory failure requiring non-invasive mechanical ventilation at home: retrospective analysis of 1-year follow-up
C, Salturk;Z, Karakurt;HB, Takir;M, Balci;F, Kargin;OY, Mocin;G, Gungor;I, Ozmen;S, Oztas;M, Yalcinsoy;R, Evin;M, Ozturk;N, Adiguzel;
Vol. 2015 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 2559-2569
430 views Abstract
2017
Characteristics of COPD patients according to GOLD classification and clinical phenotypes in the Russian Federation: the SUPPORT trial
V, Arkhipov;D, Arkhipova;M, Miravitlles;A, Lazarev;E, Stukalina;
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 3255-3262
418 views Abstract
2018
Systematic analysis of transcriptomic profiles of COPD airway epithelium using next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics
WA, Chang;MJ, Tsai;SF, Jian;CC, Sheu;PL, Kuo;
Vol. Volume 13 , pp. 2387-2398
400 views Abstract
2016
Can patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory failure from COPD be treated safely with noninvasive mechanical ventilation on the ward?
M, Yalcinsoy;C, Salturk;S, Oztas;S, Gungor;I, Ozmen;F, Kabadayi;AA, Oztim;E, Aksoy;N, Adıguzel;O, Oruc;Z, Karakurt;
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 1151-1160
382 views Abstract
2009
The impact of SHS exposure on health status and exacerbations among patients with COPD
Eisner, Mark D;Iribarren, Carlos;Yelin, Edward H;Sidney, Stephen;al., et;
Vol. 2009 , No. default , pp. 169-176
378 views Abstract
2016
The utility of inflammatory markers to predict readmissions and mortality in COPD cases with or without eosinophilia [Corrigendum]
D, Duman;E, Aksoy;MC, Agca;ND, Kocak;I, Ozmen;UA, Akturk;S, Gungor;FM, Tepetam;SA, Eroglu;S, Oztas;Z, Karakurt;
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 417-418
373 views Abstract
2007
comprometimento e ética profissional: um estudo de suas relações juntos aos contabilistas commitment and professional ethics: a study of both amongst accouting professionals
;Erivan Borges;Carlos Medeiros
Vol. 18 , No. 44 , pp. 60-71
368 views DOI Abstract
2017
The immediate effect of soft tissue manual therapy intervention on lung function in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
C, Cruz-Montecinos;D, Godoy-Olave;FA, Contreras-Briceño;P, Gutiérrez;R, Torres-Castro;L, Miret-Venegas;RM, Engel;
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 691-696
366 views Abstract
2006
utilização da análise fatorial na identificação dos principais indicadores para avaliação do desempenho financeiro: uma aplicação nas empresas de seguros use of factor analysis to identify the main financial performance assessment indicators: an application in insurance companies
;Francisco Antonio Bezerra;Luiz J Corrar
Vol. 17 , No. 42 , pp. 50-62
338 views DOI Abstract
2018
Systematic analysis of transcriptomic profiles of COPD airway epithelium using next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics
WA, Chang;MJ, Tsai;SF, Jian;CC, Sheu;PL, Kuo;
Vol. Volume 13 , pp. 2387-2398
400 views Abstract
2017
The immediate effect of soft tissue manual therapy intervention on lung function in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
C, Cruz-Montecinos;D, Godoy-Olave;FA, Contreras-Briceño;P, Gutiérrez;R, Torres-Castro;L, Miret-Venegas;RM, Engel;
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 691-696
366 views Abstract
2017
Characteristics of COPD patients according to GOLD classification and clinical phenotypes in the Russian Federation: the SUPPORT trial
V, Arkhipov;D, Arkhipova;M, Miravitlles;A, Lazarev;E, Stukalina;
Vol. Volume 12 , pp. 3255-3262
418 views Abstract
2016
the relevance of the informational content of book-tax differences for predicting future income: evidence from latin american countries
;Alessandra Vieira Cunha Marques;Patrícia de Souza Costa;Pablo Rogers Silva
Vol. 27 , No. 70 , pp. 29-42
236 views DOI Abstract
2016
Can patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory failure from COPD be treated safely with noninvasive mechanical ventilation on the ward?
M, Yalcinsoy;C, Salturk;S, Oztas;S, Gungor;I, Ozmen;F, Kabadayi;AA, Oztim;E, Aksoy;N, Adıguzel;O, Oruc;Z, Karakurt;
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 1151-1160
382 views Abstract
2016
The utility of inflammatory markers to predict readmissions and mortality in COPD cases with or without eosinophilia [Corrigendum]
D, Duman;E, Aksoy;MC, Agca;ND, Kocak;I, Ozmen;UA, Akturk;S, Gungor;FM, Tepetam;SA, Eroglu;S, Oztas;Z, Karakurt;
Vol. 2016 , No. Issue 1 , pp. 417-418
373 views Abstract
2015
evitar divulgar perdas: um estudo empírico do gerenciamento de resultados por meio de decisões operacionais
;Elizio Marcos dos Reis;Wagner Moura Lamounier;Valéria Gama Fully Bressan
Vol. 26 , No. 69 , pp. 247-260
111 views DOI Abstract
2015
presentation
;Fábio Frezatti
Vol. 26 , No. 68 , pp. 119-120
145 views DOI
2015
determinantes da alfabetização financeira: análise da influência de variáveis socioeconômicas e demográficas
;Ani Caroline Grigion Potrich;Kelmara Mendes Vieira;Guilherme Kirch
Vol. 26 , No. 69 , pp. 362-377
51 views DOI Abstract
2015
the term structure of interest rates and its impact on the liability adequacy test for insurance companies in brazil
;Antonio Aurelio Duarte;Aldy Fernandes da Silva;Luciano Vereda Oliveira;Elionor Farah Jreige Weffort;Betty Lilian Chan
Vol. 26 , No. 68 , pp. 223-236
44 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #16,560 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

69.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

12.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

46.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.