dementia & neuropsychologia | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2957 / 33,956
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

dementia & neuropsychologia

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name dement neuropsychol
Abbreviated Name dementia & neuropsychologia
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (111 total)

Development and content validity of the CENA Program for Educational Training on the Neuropsychology of Learning, with an emphasis on executive functions and attention.
Pureza, Janice R;Fonseca, Rochele P;
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 79-87
308 views DOI Abstract
1988
anthropology, demography and history; shortage of women, inter-tribal marriage relations, and slave trading in de bird’s head of new guinea
;Jelle Miedema
Vol. 144 , No. 4 , pp. 494-509
289 views
2001
selective memory and collective forgetting. historiography and the philippine centennial of 1898
;Greg Bankoff
Vol. 157 , No. 3 , pp. 539-560
288 views
0000
The Clock Drawing Test A review of its accuracy in screening for dementia
Aprahamian, Ivan;Martinelli, José Eduardo;Neri, Anita Liberalesso;Yassuda, Mônica Sanches;
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 74-80
273 views Abstract
1967
jaarverslag 1966
;Harry J. Benda;D. van Velden;Nicholas Tarling;H.J. de Graaf;John Bastin;M.A.P. Meilink-Roelofsz;H.J. de Graaf;J. Boisselier;F.D.K. Bosch;L. Sluimers;B. Dahm;W.L. Idema;Maurice Freedman
Vol. 123 , No. 3 , pp. 397-408
262 views
1994
the sociology of south-east asia; a critical review of some concepts and issues
;Victor T. King
Vol. 150 , No. 1 , pp. 171-206
261 views
2010
the development of the acehnese sitting song-dances and frame-drum genres as part of religious conversion and continuing piety
;Margaret Kartomi
Vol. 166 , No. 1 , pp. 83-106
256 views Abstract
2005
flooding in jakarta : towards a blue city with improved water management
;Peter J.M. Nas;Mark Caljouw;Mr. Pratiwo
Vol. 161 , No. 4 , pp. 454-484
256 views Abstract
2004
book reviews
;Redactie KITLV
Vol. 160 , No. 4 , pp. 563-620
255 views Abstract
1972
a tamil plakkaat relating to trade in arecanuts under the dutch in ceylon
;S. Thamanjayarajasingham
Vol. 128 , No. 2 , pp. 353-358
251 views
View All 111 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.