Indexed in Journament

International journal of medical informatics

ISSN 1872-8243· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.4/100
Journament Score
#2,960
Journament Rank
71
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name Int J Med Inform
Abbreviated Name int j med inform
ISSN 1872-8243
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-medical-informatics

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim sci

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (71)

2019
Augmented intelligence with natural language processing applied to electronic health records for identifying patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease at risk for disease progression.
Vol. 129 , pp. 334-341
496 views DOI Abstract
2020
Interventions designed to improve the safety and quality of therapeutic anticoagulation in an inpatient electronic medical record.
Vol. 135 , pp. 104066
473 views DOI Abstract
2020
Teleophthalmology for the elderly population: A review of the literature.
Vol. 136 , pp. 104089
473 views DOI Abstract
2019
Legal framework for health cloud: A systematic review.
Vol. 132 , pp. 103953
454 views DOI Abstract
2019
Diffusion dynamics of electronic health records: A longitudinal observational study comparing data from hospitals in Germany and the United States.
Vol. 131 , pp. 103952
454 views DOI Abstract
2019
Determinants of access to eHealth services in regional Australia.
Vol. 131 , pp. 103960
453 views DOI Abstract
2019
Detecting adverse drug reactions in discharge summaries of electronic medical records using Readpeer.
Vol. 128 , pp. 62-70
437 views DOI Abstract
2020
AntibioGame®: A serious game for teaching medical students about antibiotic use.
Vol. 136 , pp. 104074
430 views DOI Abstract
2019
Strengths, pitfalls, and lessons learned in implementing electronic collection of childhood vaccination data in Zambia: The SmartCare experience.
Vol. 129 , pp. 146-153
421 views DOI Abstract
2020
Automatic classification of scanned electronic health record documents.
Vol. 144 , pp. 104302
274 views DOI Abstract
2020
Blockchain in healthcare and health sciences-A scoping review.
Vol. 134 , pp. 104040
255 views DOI Abstract
2020
Teleophthalmology for the elderly population: A review of the literature.
Vol. 136 , pp. 104089
473 views DOI Abstract
2020
Impacts of robot implementation on care personnel and clients in elderly-care institutions.
Vol. 134 , pp. 104041
242 views DOI Abstract
2020
Interventions designed to improve the safety and quality of therapeutic anticoagulation in an inpatient electronic medical record.
Vol. 135 , pp. 104066
473 views DOI Abstract
2020
Mining clinical phrases from nursing notes to discover risk factors of patient deterioration.
Vol. 135 , pp. 104053
247 views DOI Abstract
2020
An ontology-driven framework to support the dynamic formation of an interdisciplinary healthcare team.
Vol. 136 , pp. 104075
181 views DOI Abstract
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
39
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

42.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

39.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.