Indexed in Journament

International journal of medical informatics

ISSN 1872-8243· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,495 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
71 Articles
Scores higher than 88% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Int J Med Inform
Abbreviated Name int j med inform
ISSN 1872-8243
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-medical-informatics

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.3
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 20.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.7
Content Distribution 76.2
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.3 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 20.0 5.8
Diversity — 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 10.7 5.8
Content Distribution 76.2 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (71)

2019
Augmented intelligence with natural language processing applied to electronic health records for identifying patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease at risk for disease progression.
Van Vleck, Tielman T;Chan, Lili;Coca, Steven G;Craven, Catherine K;Do, Ron;Ellis, Stephen B;Kannry, Joseph L;Loos, Ruth J F;Bonis, Peter A;Cho, Judy;Nadkarni, Girish N;
Vol. 129 , pp. 334-341
505 views DOI Abstract
2020
Teleophthalmology for the elderly population: A review of the literature.
Fatehi, Farhad;Jahedi, Farzad;Tay-Kearney, Mei-Ling;Kanagasingam, Yogesan;
Vol. 136 , pp. 104089
493 views DOI Abstract
2020
Interventions designed to improve the safety and quality of therapeutic anticoagulation in an inpatient electronic medical record.
Austin, Jodie;Barras, Michael;Sullivan, Clair;
Vol. 135 , pp. 104066
490 views DOI Abstract
2019
Determinants of access to eHealth services in regional Australia.
Alam, Khorshed;
Vol. 131 , pp. 103960
478 views DOI Abstract
2019
Diffusion dynamics of electronic health records: A longitudinal observational study comparing data from hospitals in Germany and the United States.
Esdar, Moritz;Hüsers, Jens;Weiß, Jan-Patrick;Rauch, Jens;Hübner, Ursula;
Vol. 131 , pp. 103952
474 views DOI Abstract
2019
Legal framework for health cloud: A systematic review.
Zandesh, Zahra;Ghazisaeedi, Marjan;Devarakonda, Murthy V;Haghighi, Mohammad Sayad;
Vol. 132 , pp. 103953
470 views DOI Abstract
2017
The effect of short message system (SMS) reminder on adherence to a healthy diet, medication, and cessation of smoking among adult patients with cardiovascular diseases.
Akhu-Zaheya, Laila M;Shiyab, Wa'ed Y;
Vol. 98 , pp. 65-75
467 views DOI Abstract
2019
Detecting adverse drug reactions in discharge summaries of electronic medical records using Readpeer.
Tang, Yixuan;Yang, Jisong;Ang, Pei San;Dorajoo, Sreemanee Raaj;Foo, Belinda;Soh, Sally;Tan, Siew Har;Tham, Mun Yee;Ye, Qing;Shek, Lynette;Sung, Cynthia;Tung, Anthony;
Vol. 128 , pp. 62-70
447 views DOI Abstract
2020
AntibioGame®: A serious game for teaching medical students about antibiotic use.
Tsopra, Rosy;Courtine, Mélanie;Sedki, Karima;Eap, David;Cabal, Manon;Cohen, Samuel;Bouchaud, Olivier;Mechaï, Frédéric;Lamy, Jean-Baptiste;
Vol. 136 , pp. 104074
445 views DOI Abstract
2019
Strengths, pitfalls, and lessons learned in implementing electronic collection of childhood vaccination data in Zambia: The SmartCare experience.
Clarke, Kristie E N;Phiri Chibawe, Caroline;Essiet-Gibson, Idongesit;Dien Mwansa, Francis;Jacenko, Sara;Rhee, Chulwoo;Kwendakwape, Maggy;Kashoka, Andrew;MacNeil, Adam;
Vol. 129 , pp. 146-153
430 views DOI Abstract
2023
Understanding the convergence of social enterprise, digital health, and citizen engagement for co-producing integrated Person-Centred health services: A critical review and theoretical framework.
Godinho, Myron Anthony;Ashraf, Md Mahfuz;Narasimhan, Padmanesan;Liaw, Siaw-Teng;
Vol. 178 , pp. 105174
178 views DOI Abstract
2020
Automatic classification of scanned electronic health record documents.
Goodrum, Heath;Roberts, Kirk;Bernstam, Elmer V;
Vol. 144 , pp. 104302
282 views DOI Abstract
2020
Blockchain in healthcare and health sciences-A scoping review.
Hasselgren, Anton;Kralevska, Katina;Gligoroski, Danilo;Pedersen, Sindre A;Faxvaag, Arild;
Vol. 134 , pp. 104040
270 views DOI Abstract
2020
Corrigendum to “Patient perspectives on the linkage of health data for research: Insights from an online patient community questionnaire” (International Journal of Medical Informatics (2019) 127 (9–17), (S1386505618312632), (10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.04.003))
O'Brien, E.C.
Vol. 136 , pp. 0-0
224 views DOI
2020
Teleophthalmology for the elderly population: A review of the literature.
Fatehi, Farhad;Jahedi, Farzad;Tay-Kearney, Mei-Ling;Kanagasingam, Yogesan;
Vol. 136 , pp. 104089
493 views DOI Abstract
2020
Impacts of robot implementation on care personnel and clients in elderly-care institutions.
Melkas, Helinä;Hennala, Lea;Pekkarinen, Satu;Kyrki, Ville;
Vol. 134 , pp. 104041
252 views DOI Abstract
2020
Quantifying the competitiveness of the electronic health record market and its implications for interoperability
Sorace, J.
Vol. 136 , pp. 0-0
186 views DOI
2020
Interventions designed to improve the safety and quality of therapeutic anticoagulation in an inpatient electronic medical record.
Austin, Jodie;Barras, Michael;Sullivan, Clair;
Vol. 135 , pp. 104066
490 views DOI Abstract
2020
Mining clinical phrases from nursing notes to discover risk factors of patient deterioration.
Korach, Zfania Tom;Yang, Jie;Rossetti, Sarah Collins;Cato, Kenrick D;Kang, Min-Jeoung;Knaplund, Christopher;Schnock, Kumiko O;Garcia, Jose P;Jia, Haomiao;Schwartz, Jessica M;Zhou, Li;
Vol. 135 , pp. 104053
269 views DOI Abstract
2020
An ontology-driven framework to support the dynamic formation of an interdisciplinary healthcare team.
Wilk, Szymon;Kezadri-Hamiaz, Mounira;Amyot, Daniel;Michalowski, Wojtek;Kuziemsky, Craig;Catal, Nihan;Rosu, Daniela;Carrier, Marc;Giffen, Randy;
Vol. 136 , pp. 104075
202 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
38.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,495 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

76.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.