Indexed in Journament

phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology

ISSN 1618-095X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
33.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,872 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
44 Articles
Scores higher than 49.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name phytomedicine
Abbreviated Name phytomedicine
ISSN 1618-095X
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/phytomedicine

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 37.0 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 7.1 7.8
Content Distribution 58.2 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (44)

2019
Systematic exploration of Astragalus membranaceus and Panax ginseng as immune regulators: Insights from the comparative biological and computational analysis.
, pp. 153077
463 views DOI Abstract
2010
In vitro anti-leukemic activity of the ethno-pharmacological plant Scutellaria orientalis ssp. carica endemic to western Turkey.
Vol. 17 , No. 1 , pp. 55-62
459 views DOI Abstract
2017
A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of saffron stigma (Crocus sativus L.) in mothers suffering from mild-to-moderate postpartum depression.
Vol. 36 , pp. 145-152
453 views DOI Abstract
2020
Scutellarin protects against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by suppressing NLRP3 inflammasome activation.
Vol. 68 , pp. 153169
448 views DOI Abstract
2014
Hautriwaic acid as one of the hepatoprotective constituent of Dodonaea viscosa.
Vol. 21 , No. 2 , pp. 131-40
436 views DOI Abstract
2019
Inotodiol inhibits cells migration and invasion and induces apoptosis via p53-dependent pathway in HeLa cells.
, pp. 152957
423 views DOI Abstract
2019
Combining the wisdoms of traditional medicine with cutting-edge science and technology at the forefront of medical sciences.
Vol. 64 , pp. 153078
413 views DOI Abstract
2020
A scientometric visualization analysis for global toxicology and pharmacology research of natural products from 1962 to 2018.
Vol. 68 , pp. 153190
404 views DOI Abstract
2018
2019
Niazirin from Moringa oleifera Lam. attenuates high glucose-induced oxidative stress through PKCζ/Nox4 pathway.
, pp. 153066
384 views DOI Abstract
2020
A scientometric visualization analysis for global toxicology and pharmacology research of natural products from 1962 to 2018.
Vol. 68 , pp. 153190
404 views DOI Abstract
2020
Scutellarin protects against myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by suppressing NLRP3 inflammasome activation.
Vol. 68 , pp. 153169
448 views DOI Abstract
2019
Analytical strategies for the discovery and validation of quality-markers of traditional Chinese medicine.
Vol. 67 , pp. 153165
296 views DOI Abstract
2019
Kanglaite injection plus platinum-based chemotherapy for stage III/IV non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of 27 RCTs.
Vol. 67 , pp. 153154
370 views DOI Abstract
2019
Multiorgan toxicity induced by EtOH extract of Fructus Psoraleae in Wistar rats.
Vol. 58 , pp. 152874
277 views DOI Abstract
2019
Selection and evaluation of quality markers from Yinlan capsule and its LXRα-mediated therapy for hyperlipidemia.
Vol. 59 , pp. 152896
242 views DOI Abstract
2019
Systematic exploration of Astragalus membranaceus and Panax ginseng as immune regulators: Insights from the comparative biological and computational analysis.
, pp. 153077
463 views DOI Abstract
2019
Combining the wisdoms of traditional medicine with cutting-edge science and technology at the forefront of medical sciences.
Vol. 64 , pp. 153078
413 views DOI Abstract
2019
The pharmacology of the genus Sophora (Fabaceae): An updated review.
Vol. 64 , pp. 153070
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
Essential oils and its bioactive compounds modulating cytokines: A systematic review on anti-asthmatic and immunomodulatory properties.
, pp. 152854
309 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
33.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,872 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

33.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

37.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

58.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.