semina: ciências exatas e tecnológicas | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1705 / 33,950
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 6 days ago

semina: ciências exatas e tecnológicas

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name semina: ciências exatas e tecnológicas
Abbreviated Name semina: ciências exatas e tecnológicas
ISSN 0000-0000
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2016
pendugaan umur simpan tepung biji durian (durio zibethinus) dengan menggunakan persamaan arrhenius
;Suhaimi Suhaimi;Ratna Ratna;Kiman Siregar
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 74-88
388 views DOI Abstract
2013
intersepsi curah hujan pada tegakan pohon pinus (casuarina cunninghamia)
;Susi Chairani;Dewi Sri Jayanti
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 405-412
364 views DOI Abstract
2015
Supervisory System and Multivariable Control Applying Weighted Fuzzy-PID Logic in an Alcoholic Fermentation Process
Mendonça, Márcio;Correa, Elton Carlos;Chrun, Ivan Rossato;Buss, Orion;
Vol. 36 , No. 2 , pp. 95-108
356 views Abstract
2016
aplikasi teknik data driven untuk prediksi debit sungai bulanan studi kasus bendung loning, magelang
;Joko Suryanto
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 116-134
348 views DOI Abstract
2015
peningkatan kinerja mesin diesel dengan produksi biodiesel dari kelapa (coconut nufera) dan unjuk kinerjanya berbasis transesterifikasi dengan sistim injeksi langsung
;Soni Sisbudi Harsono;Kiman Siregar
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 62-75
293 views DOI Abstract
2012
Optimization of complex configuration of catenary risers buoyancy modules
Arruda, Marcos Diego Siqueira Verçosa;Martins, Michele Agra de Lemos;Lages, Eduardo Nobre;
Vol. 33 , No. 2 , pp. 149-164
290 views Abstract
2012
prediksi erosi kebun kopi rakyat di kecamatan permata, kabupaten bener meriah, provinsi aceh
;Hairul Basri;Syamaun A. Ali;Konadi Konadi
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 341-346
271 views DOI Abstract
2017
rancang bangun pompa sistem wheel spiral untuk skala kecil
;Feri Arlius;Eri Gas Ekaputra;Delvi Yanti
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 46-57
265 views DOI Abstract
2011
Audit of public work
Camargo, Valtencir Godinho de;
Vol. 32 , No. 2 , pp. 257-270
240 views Abstract
2016
dampak perubahan iklim terhadap debit andalan sungai krueng aceh
;Teuku Ferijal;Mustafril Mustafril;Dewi Sri Jayanti
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 50-61
207 views DOI Abstract
View All 13 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.