ccps middle east process safety conference 2017 | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5076 / 33,973
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

ccps middle east process safety conference 2017

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name ccps middle east process safety conference 2017
Abbreviated Name ccps middle east process safety conference 2017
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2015
twitter, journalism and affective labour
;Eugenia Siapera;Ioanna Iliadi
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 76-89
303 views Abstract
2017
Emergency planning and response: A challenge in process safety management. Lessons to learn from the oil and gas industry
Pinzon, O.
Vol. 2017-October , pp. 29-31
295 views
2016
o conceito de cognição jornalística: percepção social do caso charlie segundo correspondentes na imprensa brasileira
;Margarethe Born Steinberger-Elias
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 58-71
285 views Abstract
2017
An approach to improve process safety management audits
not, found
Vol. 2017-October , pp. 242
273 views
2017
Evergreening - Process safety management of flare and relief systems
Abbasi, U.
Vol. 2017-October , pp. 119-127
238 views
2015
le live-blogging : les figures co-construites de l’information et du public participant. la couverture de l’affaire dsk par lemonde.fr.
;Nathalie Pignard-Cheynel;Brigitte Sebbah
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 134-153
217 views Abstract
2014
le numéro entier, full issue, edição completa.
;Francois Demers;Florence Le Cam;Fabio Henrique Pereira;Denis Ruellan
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. -
217 views Abstract
2013
d’étranges étrangers. qui gouverne les correspondants de jérusalem ?
;Jérôme Bourdon
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 144-159
214 views Abstract
2015
o jornalismo televisivo nas redes sociais. as relações comunicacionais entre o mito e o fã.
;Paulo Eduardo Cajazeira;Felipe Coimbra Fernandes de Azevedo
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 116-133
208 views Abstract
2013
sommaire- sumário- summary
;François Demers;Florence Le Cam;Fabio Henrique Pereira;Denis Ruellan
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 1-3
206 views Abstract
View All 15 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.