Indexed in Journament

ccps middle east process safety conference 2017

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.2/100
Journament Score
#7,893
Journament Rank
15
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name ccps middle east process safety conference 2017
Abbreviated Name ccps middle east process safety conference 2017

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2015
twitter, journalism and affective labour
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 76-89
316 views Abstract
2016
2017
An approach to improve process safety management audits
Vol. 2017-October , pp. 242
283 views
2017
Evergreening - Process safety management of flare and relief systems
Vol. 2017-October , pp. 119-127
249 views
2014
le numéro entier, full issue, edição completa.
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. -
224 views Abstract
2013
d’étranges étrangers. qui gouverne les correspondants de jérusalem ?
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 144-159
222 views Abstract
2015
2015
o jornalismo televisivo nas redes sociais. as relações comunicacionais entre o mito e o fã.
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 116-133
220 views Abstract
2013
sommaire- sumário- summary
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 1-3
215 views Abstract
2017
Evergreening - Process safety management of flare and relief systems
Vol. 2017-October , pp. 119-127
249 views
2017
An approach to improve process safety management audits
Vol. 2017-October , pp. 242
283 views
2016
2015
la participación en los medios de comunicación a través de twitter. estudio comparativo entre los periodistas catalanes y belgas.
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 62-73
180 views Abstract
2015
o jornalismo televisivo nas redes sociais. as relações comunicacionais entre o mito e o fã.
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 116-133
220 views Abstract
2015
twitter, journalism and affective labour
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. 76-89
316 views Abstract
2015
2015
superando as frustrações normativas da pesquisa sobre a participação da audiência. introdução.
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 20-27
206 views Abstract
2014
la « niche fiscale » des journalistes et la morphologie des mondes de l’information.
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 102-115
158 views Abstract
40
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

40.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.