Indexed in Journament

journal of organizational behavior management

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
25.1 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #27,068 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
29 Articles
Scores higher than 7.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name journal of organizational behavior management
Abbreviated Name journal of organizational behavior management

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.4
Timeliness 0.0
Diversity 11.1
Innovation 19.5
Community Impact 2.9
Content Distribution 77.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility — 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 11.1 25.8
Innovation 19.5 27.4
Community Impact 2.9 7.8
Content Distribution 77.8 88.6
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (29)

2017
COMMENTARY: Integrating Behavioral Science with Process Safety Management
Dagen, J.
Vol. 37 , pp. 332-338
356 views DOI
2012
the slavic adventures of greek kohath: on the origin of the title of the old russian book of kaaf
;Александр Игоревич Грищенко
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 95-110
271 views Abstract
2017
theory and practice of parochial preaching in the late 18th-century polish-lithuanian commonwealth
;Stanisław Witecki
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. -
254 views Abstract
2015
some verbal forms in the testament of vladimir monomakh to his children and the language of kiev in the 11th century
;Maria N. Sheveleva
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. -
249 views Abstract
2015
sociolinguistic aspects of the first translations of the bible into the russian language
;Alexander G. Kravetsky
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. -
247 views Abstract
2015
Cultural Change in a Medical School: A Data-Driven Management of Entropy
Baker, T.
Vol. 35 , pp. 95-122
247 views DOI
2016
glagolitic inscriptions on ceramic vessels uncovered during archaeological excavations in scupi (skopje)
;Antonio Jakimovski;Igor Tolevski
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. -
243 views Abstract
2012
christian raffensperger, reimagining europe: kievan rus’ in the medieval world (= harvard historical studies, 177), harvard university press, cambridge, massachusetts, london, england, 2012, 329 pp.
;Fjodor B. Uspenskij
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 153-159
239 views
2015
garðaríki and its capital: novgorod on the mental map of medieval scandinavians
;Tatjana N. Jackson
Vol. 4 , No. 1 , pp. -
231 views Abstract
2017
sokolov s. v., conceptions of origin of varangian rus’ in 18th–19th centuries russian historiography, yekaterinburg, 2015, 314 pp.
;Vladimir Ya. Petrukhin
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. -
228 views
2017
sokolov s. v., conceptions of origin of varangian rus’ in 18th–19th centuries russian historiography, yekaterinburg, 2015, 314 pp.
;Vladimir Ya. Petrukhin
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. -
228 views
2017
a first attempt at sociolinguistic typology of biscriptual situations. about daniel bunčić et al.’s book “biscriptality: a sociolinguistic typology” (heidelberg, 2016)
;Nina B. Mechkovskaya
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. -
221 views
2017
the influence of the island status of a community on its system of values: on the identity of the old believers in poland through their language
;Maxim M. Makartsev
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. -
138 views Abstract
2017
the perfect in old church slavonic: was it resultative?
;Vladimir A. Plungian;Anna Yu. Urmanchieva
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. -
181 views Abstract
2017
tempering an enlightened educator: frédéric-césar de la harpe at the russian imperial court (1783–1795)
;Andrei Yu. Andreev;Danièle Tosato-Rigo
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. -
153 views Abstract
2017
round table: “sermons in religious and cultural politics and practice in russia and europe in the 18th–early 19th centuries”. august, 26–27, 2016. german historical institute in moscow
;Denis A. Sdvizhkov
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. -
200 views
2017
theory and practice of parochial preaching in the late 18th-century polish-lithuanian commonwealth
;Stanisław Witecki
Vol. 6 , No. 2 , pp. -
254 views Abstract
2017
two blessings for ostromir the posadnik
;Alexander L. Lifshits
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. -
120 views Abstract
2017
COMMENTARY: Integrating Behavioral Science with Process Safety Management
Dagen, J.
Vol. 37 , pp. 332-338
356 views DOI
2016
the primary slavic complex of liturgical books of the byzantine rite (“clement’s corpus”) and the formation of the macedonian redaction of church slavonic
;Emilija Crvenkovska
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. -
125 views Abstract
Journament Score
25.1/100 · Poor
Ranked #27,068 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

25.1/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

11.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

19.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

77.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.