institution of chemical engineers symposium series | Journament

Journal Ranking

#8081 / 33,987
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

institution of chemical engineers symposium series

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name institution of chemical engineers symposium series
Abbreviated Name institution of chemical engineers symposium series
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (55 total)

2006
when harry met zuckerman: self-reflexivity and metafiction in philip roth and woody allen
;Thomás Creus
, No. 51 , pp. 265-282
283 views DOI Abstract
2018
Bridging the safety gap: The key role of a sound process safety culture in minimizing audit findings
Prats, E.
Vol. 2018-May , pp. 0-0
277 views
2008
non-conflicting violations of grammatical constraints? logophoric reflexives, peculiar passives, and gricean implicatures non-conflicting violations of grammatical constraints? logophoric reflexives, peculiar passives, and gricean implicatures
;Sergio de Moura Menuzzi
, No. 47 , pp. 129-168
250 views Abstract
2008
bortoni-ricardo, stella m. the urbanization of rural dialect speakers: a sociolinguistic study in brazil. cambridge: cambridge university press, 1985. 265p. bortoni-ricardo, stella m. the urbanization of rural dialect speakers: a sociolinguistic study in brazil. cambridge: cambridge university press, 1985. 265p.
;Maria Jandyra Cunha
, No. 20 , pp. 099-103
237 views Abstract
2008
a reflection of grace: the place of humor in the theology of flannery o'connor a reflection of grace: the place of humor in the theology of flannery o'connor
;John N. Sommerville Jr
, No. 30 , pp. 079-090
228 views Abstract
2003
we learn to write by reading, but writing can make you smarter
;Stephen Krashen
, No. 44 , pp. 067-081
220 views DOI Abstract
2008
simone de beauvoir - a grande dama do feminismo
;Rosa Alice Caubet
, No. 14 , pp. 013-026
199 views Abstract
2008
stunted sexuality in hawthorne's the blithedale romance stunted sexuality in hawthorne's the blithedale romance
;Arnold Gordenstein
Vol. 4 , No. 10 , pp. 071-078
192 views Abstract
2008
carmen miranda’s white dress: ethnicity, syncretism and subaltern sexualities in springtime in the rockies carmen miranda’s white dress: ethnicity, syncretism and subaltern sexualities in springtime in the rockies
;José Gatti
, No. 51 , pp. 093-108
184 views Abstract
2008
time and space in reading – the interplay between pleasure and comprehension in a reading task time and space in reading – the interplay between pleasure and comprehension in a reading task
;Vilson Jose Leffa
, No. 43 , pp. 037-060
184 views Abstract
View All 55 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.